Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T11:36:01.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AIG Capital Partners Inc. and Another v. Republic of Kazakhstan (National Bank of Kazakhstan Intervening)

United Kingdom, England.  20 October 2005 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State immunity — Immunity from execution — Enforcement of arbitration award against foreign State — Bank accounts — Property of central bank — Source of funds and purpose for which those funds intended irrelevant — Whether funds intended for use for commercial purposes — Human rights — Whether restriction on enforcement against assets contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 6 or Article 1 of the First Protocol — Evidence of foreign State’s Head of Mission

Human rights — Access to courts — State immunity — Whether restriction on enforcement of judgment against assets of a foreign State a restriction on right of access to court — European Convention on Human Rights, Article 6 — Whether engaged — Whether limitation legitimate and proportionate — Right to property — European Convention on Human Rights, First Protocol, Article 1

Economics, trade and finance — Investment protection — ICSID — Enforcement of ICSID award — State immunity — The law of England

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)