Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-10T10:02:52.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Al-Sirri v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Intervening)

United Kingdom, England.  18 March 2009 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Aliens — Asylum claim — Appellant claiming asylum in United Kingdom — Refusal of asylum by Home Secretary — Refusal of asylum upheld by Asylum and Immigration Tribunal — Article 1F(c) of Refugee Convention, 1951 — Whether appellant guilty of acts contrary to purposes and principles of United Nations — Terrorism

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Refugee Convention, 1951 — Convention having domestic force to extent adopted by national legislation — Convention given effect by European Community directive which was itself directly effective in domestic law — European Communities Act 1972 — Council Directive 2004/83/EC — Qualification of application of Section 1 of Terrorism Act 2000 to proceedings under Article 1F of Refugee Convention, 1951

Treaties — Interpretation — Refugee Convention, 1951 — Straightforward language of Convention — Scope and purpose of Convention — Article 1F(c) of Convention — Principles and purposes of United Nations — Whether terrorism contrary to principles and purposes of United Nations — Whether individual acts of terrorism within reach of Article 1F(c) — United Nations Charter — Meaning and scope — Relevant Security Council resolutions — Resolution 1624 — Centrality of principles and purposes of United Nations to adjudication — Article 1F(c) of Refugee Convention, 1951

Terrorism — Whether acts of terrorism constituting acts contrary to principles and purposes of United Nations — Article 1F(c) of Refugee Convention, 1951 — Whether Article 1F(c) of Convention confined to state actors

Human rights — Torture — Evidence obtained by torture — Repudiation of torture as means of obtaining evidence — Whether appellant’s Egyptian convictions obtained by torture — Weight to be given to evidence obtained by torture — Whether Asylum and Immigration Tribunal erring in law by giving weight to Egyptian convictions — The law of England

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)