Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T19:21:52.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case Concerning The Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso and Mali)

International Court of Justice.  10 January 1986 ; 22 December 1986 ; 09 April 1987 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Territory — Boundaries — Principles of delimitation — Dispute between States formerly part of the same colonial empire — Principle of uti possidetis juris — Establishment of boundaries between administrative units of former colonial empire — Critical date — Relevance of acts of administration following independence — Cartographic evidence — Significance — Equitable considerations — Equity infra legem — Estoppel — Acquiescence in existing boundary — Statements accepting proposed boundary — Legal effects

Territory — Self-determination — Nature of right to self-determination — When right exercised — Decolonization — Principle of uti possidetis juris

State succession — Territory — Units of former colonial empire becoming independent States — Succession to administrative boundaries of former colonies — Principle of uti possidetis juris — Acceptance of boundaries by former colonial administrations

Sources of international law — Acquiescence and protest — Relevance in boundary dispute — Whether establishing rules of law to be applied by international tribunal — Estoppel — Unilateral declaration — Circumstances in which unilateral declaration legally binding — Equity — Equity infra legem — Relevance in boundary dispute — Land boundary — Determination of relevant equitable considerations

International Court of Justice — Chamber — Constitution of Chamber — Dispute referred to Chamber by Special Agreement — Interim measures of protection — Outbreak of armed conflict between Parties to case before the Court — Nature of appropriate interim measures — Relationship between the role of the Court indicating interim measures and the terms of the ceasefire agreed between the Parties — Whether terms of interim measures amount to pre-judgment of merits — Law to be applied by Court — Effect of acceptance of principle by a Party — Whether precluding Court from applying contrary principle

Treaties — Unilateral declaration — When binding upon State making declaration

War and armed conflict — Cessation of active hostilities — Ceasefire agreement — Indication of interim measures by International Court of Justice — Court already seised of dispute before outbreak of hostilities

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)