Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T19:47:52.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eckle Case

European Court of Human Rights.  21 June 1983 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State responsibility — Nature and kinds of — For breaches of treaty obligations — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Violation established — Just satisfaction — Material loss — Causal link between claims and breach of Convention — Non-pecuniary damage — Whether finding of violation already furnishes sufficient just satisfaction — Legal costs and expenses — Whether reasonable and actually incurred

State responsibility — Damages (Measure of damages) — Grounds for awarding damages — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 50 — Just satisfaction in respect of breach established — Material loss — Non-pecuniary damage — Legal costs and expenses

Disputes — Other international courts — European Court of Human Rights — Proceedings for just satisfaction under European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Request to defer judgment until national courts’ final decision on reparation — Whether suspension of proceedings would hinder proper administration of justice

The individual in international law — In general — Human rights and freedoms — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Violation of right to a hearing within a reasonable time established — Article 50 — Just satisfaction — Request to defer judgment until national courts' final decision on reparation — Whether suspension of proceedings would hinder proper administration of justice Material loss — Causal link between claims and breach of Convention — Non-pecuniary damage — Whether finding of violation sufficient just satisfaction — Particular circumstances to be taken into account — Legal costs and expenses — Whether reasonable and actually incurred — Proceedings before national courts — Proceedings before Convention institutions

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)