Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-02T00:54:10.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan

International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes.  16 October 2002 ; 19 December 2002 ; 06 August 2003 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Arbitration — Jurisdiction — ICSID Convention, Article 41 — Duty of tribunal to judge its own competence — Provisional measures — ICSID Convention — Article 47 — Right to access international adjudication — Whether capable of being constrained by decision of national court — Procedure — Disqualification challenge to arbitration tribunal member — ICSID Convention, Article 57 — ICSID Arbitration Rules, Rule 9(4)

Arbitration — Arbitrators — Composition of arbitration tribunal — Disqualification challenge to member — Publication by member on issues raised in claim — Continuing retainer of member’s law firm by United Mexican States — Appointment of member’s law firm in unrelated NAFTA case in which counsel for respondent was appointed President of Tribunal — No facts to lead to reasonable inference that member will favour respondent on basis of an understanding between member and counsel for respondent — Challenge rejected

Economics, trade and finance — Investment protection — ICSID Convention, Article 25(1) — Interpretation of “investment” — Distinguishable from an ordinary commercial transaction — Investment broadly defined under treaty — Whether contract involved a “claim for money” — Whether contract in the nature of a public law concession

Economics, trade and finance — Investment protection — Forum selection clause — Contractual arbitration clause covering all disputes arising from the contract — Relation to bilateral investment treaty and ICSID arbitration — Whether claims relating to breach of contract and breach of treaty are distinct — Whether contractual arbitration clause includes jurisdiction over treaty claims — Whether ICSID has exclusive jurisdiction over breach of treaty claims — Whether ICSID has concurrent jurisdiction over breach of contract claims — Terms of the contract — Whether the tribunal can decide factual issues with respect to the contract which is subject to another body’s jurisdiction — Relationship between contractual claims and treaty claims — Distinct nature of international law standards

Economics, trade and finance — Investment protection — Bilateral investment treaty — Umbrella clause — Whether elevating alleged contractual breaches into treaty violations — Consequences of such an interpretation — Whether clear evidence existed of an intention to produce such consequences

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)