Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T01:44:42.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Zaire v. D’Hoop and Another

Belgium.  09 March 1995 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State immunity — Attachment and execution — Bank accounts — Funds allegedly allocated for diplomatic functions — Criteria for determining whether funds immune from attachment — Whether courts of forum entitled to question statements made by accredited State concerning allocation of funds

Diplomatic relations — Immunity — Property — Embassy bank account — Whether enjoying automatic immunity from execution — Funds allegedly allocated for diplomatic functions — Burden of proof — Whether courts of accrediting State entitled to verify nature of funds deposited by embassy — Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961

Diplomatic relations — Diplomatic agent — Immunity — Scope — Lease of premises as private residence for diplomat — Failure to disclose diplomatic status — Whether constituting tacit waiver of immunity — The law of Belgium

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)