Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-06T17:16:56.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

European Communities: Commission Decisions Relating to Restrictive Business Practices*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other Documents
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 8 , Issue 6 , November 1969 , pp. 1311 - 1336
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

[© 1969 Commerce Clearing House, Inc. This English translation is reproduced by permission from Common Market Reports, Supplement No. 115 (August 20, 1969).

[As of October 10, 1969, three of the firms fined for restrictive business practices in the quinine market had appealed to the European Court of Justice to annul the Commission's decision of July 16, 1969. Appeals were filed by Nedchem (now Chemie Farma), Buchler, and Boehringer; the three French firms had not yet introduced appeals.

[The Commission Decision of July 24, 1969, relating to restrictive business practices in the dyestuffs market as infringements of Article 85 of the E.E.C. Treaty, appears at page 1330.]

References

* Unofficial CCH translation.

[As of November 4, 1969, all but one of the firms fined for restrictive business practices in the dyestuffs market had appealed to the European Court of Justice to annul the Commission’s decision of July 24, 1969. The firms based outside the Common Market appealed through their subsidiaries. The Swiss firm, Ciba, had not yet appealed to the Court.]

1 Pursuant to Article 18 of Regulation No. 17 and in conjunction with. Article 17, paragraph 1, of the Budgetary Regulation of the Community of July 30, 1968 (Official Journal No. L 199, August 10, 1968), the value of one unit of account is 0.88867088 grams of fine gold, which at present is equivalent to 4 Deutsche mark, 50 Belgian francs, 4.93706 French francs, 625 Italian lire, and 3.62 Dutch florins (Official Journal No. C 65, June 2, 1969).