Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T18:33:06.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

European Court of Human Rights: Case of Mentes et al. v. Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* This text is reproduced and reformatted from the text available at the European Court of Human Rights Web site (visited 5/21/98)<http://www.dhcour.coe.fr/eng>

** This text is reproduced and reformatted to be substantially similar to the text appearing on the European Court of Human Rights Website (visited 5/21/98) < http://www.dhcour.coe.fr/eng/MENTES%20ENG.html. >

*** The present judgment is subject to editorial revision before its reproduction in final form in Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997. These reports are obtainable from the publisher Carl Heymanns Verlag KG (Luxemburger Straße 449, D-50939 Köln), who will also arrange for their distribution in association with the agents for certain countries as listed below.

1 This summary by the registry does not bind the Court.

2 The case is numbered 58/1996/677/867. The first number is the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court in the relevant year (second number). The last two numbers indicate the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court since its creation and on the list of the corresponding originating applications to the Commission.

3 Rules A apply to all cases referred to the Court before the entry into force of Protocol No. 9(1 October 1994) and thereafter only to cases concerning States not bound by that Protocol. They correspond to the Rules that came into force on 1 January 1983, as amended several times subsequently.

4 Note by the Registrar. For practical reasons this annex will appear only with the printed version of the judgment (in Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997), but a copy of the Commission's report is obtainable from the registry.

5 Paragraph 5 of the Commission's report.

6 Paragraphs 27-30 of the judgment; paragraphs 41-44 of the Commission's report.

7 Paragraph 59 of the judgment.

8 Paragraph 58 of the judgment.

9 Paragraph 91 of the judgment.

10 Paragraph 145 of the Commission's report.

11 ibid., §§ 89-94.

12 ibid., §§ 95-104.

13 ibid., §§90-91.

14 ibid., §§ 96, 97, 101 and 102.

15 ibid., §§ 48.