No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
United Nations: Security Council Draft Resolution Condemning the Mining of Nicaraguan Ports*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 April 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0020782900030345/resource/name/firstPage-S0020782900030345a.jpg)
- Type
- Other Documents
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1984
Footnotes
[Reproduced from U.N. Document S/16463 of April 4, 1984. At thescurity Council's 2529th Meeting on April 4, 1984, the draft resolutionis put to a vote. It was vetoed by the United States. By show of hands,lose voting in favor of the draft were China, Egypt, France, India, Malta, The Netherlands, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Peru, Ukrainian SSR, USSR, Upper Delta, and Zimbabwe. The United Kingdom abstained.
[The ICJ Order with regard to the request for an indication of provisionallasures in the case concerning military and paramilitary activities in andfainst Nicaragua, issued May 10, 1984, appears at I.L.M. page 468. TheJ Order of May 14, 1984, fixing time–limits for written proceedings onlestions of jurisdiction and admissibility in this case (Nicaragua v. United States), appears at page 488. The US letter to the UN Secretaryneral concerning the non–applicability of compulsory jurisdiction of the with regard to disputes with Central American States is at page 670.]
References
* [Reproduced from U.N. Document S/16463 of April 4, 1984. At thescurity Council's 2529th Meeting on April 4, 1984, the draft resolutionis put to a vote. It was vetoed by the United States. By show of hands,lose voting in favor of the draft were China, Egypt, France, India, Malta, The Netherlands, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Peru, Ukrainian SSR, USSR, Upper Delta, and Zimbabwe. The United Kingdom abstained.
[The ICJ Order with regard to the request for an indication of provisionallasures in the case concerning military and paramilitary activities in andfainst Nicaragua, issued May 10, 1984, appears at I.L.M. page 468. TheJ Order of May 14, 1984, fixing time–limits for written proceedings onlestions of jurisdiction and admissibility in this case (Nicaragua v. United States), appears at page 488. The US letter to the UN Secretaryneral concerning the non–applicability of compulsory jurisdiction of the with regard to disputes with Central American States is at page 670.]