Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T23:15:51.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

European Court of Human Rights (ECHR): Case of Broniowski V. Poland*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 13 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This document was reproduced and reformatted from the text appearing at the ECHR website (visited June 22, 2004) www.echr.coe.int

References

1 See paragraph 46 below.

2 www.amw.com.pl.

3 www.anr.gov.pl.

4 Reply by the Minister for Infrastructure of 12 July 2002; available on the Polish Parliament's website: www.sejm.gov.pl.

5 That section was repealed on 30 January 2004, by virtue of section 14 of the December 2003 Act (see also paragraph 118 below).

6 In the consolidated text of the Land Administration Act 1985 (cited in paragraph 46 above), that provision became section 81 § 1.

7 The Court's translation is based on the text of the official translation made for the research department of the Sejm (lower house of the Polish Parliament) Chancellery.

8 The district in which the applicant's claim was registered at that time; see also paragraphs 22 and 26 above.

9 See paragraphs 103-104 below.

10 See paragraph 67 above.

11 That provision reads: “When a complaint alleging inactivity on the part of an administrative authority is well-founded, the Supreme Administrative Court shall oblige that authority to issue a decision, or to perform a specific act, or to confirm, declare, or recognise a right or obligation provided for by law.“