Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T20:24:07.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

France: Tribunal Decision on Chilean Copper Corporation's Plea of Sovereign Immunity in Third Party Attachment*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

[Reproduced from the English translation provided by the Kennecott Copper Corporation.

[The Braden Copper Company’s Petition to the President of the Court of Extended Jurisdiction of Paris for a third party attachment appears on this page. The Braden Copper Company also petitioned the Court with regard to a copper cargo sold by the Chilean Copper Corporation to the Société Trefimetaux G.P for the amount of Francs 2,721,720.

[The Court Order authorizing the attachment and the notice of delivery appear at page 185. The same order and notice were also made in the case of the Société Trefimetaux G.P. The Tribunal’s Decision appears at page 187.

[The Chilean Decree establishing a commercial monopoly on the exportation of Copper appears at page 98.]

References

* [Reproduced from the English translation provided by the Kennecott Copper Corporation.

[The Braden Copper Company’s Petition to the President of the Court of Extended Jurisdiction of Paris for a third party attachment appears on this page. The Braden Copper Company also petitioned the Court with regard to a copper cargo sold by the Chilean Copper Corporation to the Société Trefimetaux G.P for the amount of Francs 2,721,720.

[The Court Order authorizing the attachment and the notice of delivery appear at page 185. The same order and notice were also made in the case of the Société Trefimetaux G.P. The Tribunal’s Decision appears at page 187.

[The Chilean Decree establishing a commercial monopoly on the exportation of Copper appears at page 98.]