Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T06:24:33.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID): Joy Mining Machinery Limited V. Arab Republic of Egypt*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 73 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Document provided to the ILM office by a Corresponding Editor.

References

1 United Parcel Service of America v. Government of Canada, Award on Jurisdiction of November 22, 2002, available at http://www.state.gov/s/l/c3749.htm.

2 v, Methanex Corp.. United States of America, First Partial Award of August 7, 2002,Google Scholar available at http://www.state.gov/s/l/c5818.htm.

3 Emilio Agustín Mqffezini v. Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7), Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction of January 25, 2000, 16 ICSID Rev.—FILJ 212 (2001).

4 CMS Gas Transmission Company v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8), Decision on Jurisdiction of July 17, 2003, 42 ILM 788 (2003).

5 v, Azurix Corp.. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12), Decision on Jurisdiction of December 8, 2003, International Law in Brief (Dec. 2003),Google Scholar available at <http://www.asil.org/ilib/azurix.pdf.>

6 SGS Société Générale de Surveillance S.A. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13), Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction of August 6, 2003, 18 ICSID Rev.—FILJ 301 (2003).

7 Salini Construttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A. v. Kingdom of Morocco (ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4), Decision on Jurisdiction of July 23, 2001, 129 Journal du droit international 196 (2002) [French original]; English translation in 42 ILM 609 (2003).

8 Ceskoslovenska obchodni banka, a.s. v. Slovak Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/4), Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction (May 24, 1999), available at http://www.worldbank.org/icsid/cases/cs_obdecision.pdf; Decision of the Tribunal on the Further and Partial Objection to Jurisdiction of December 1, 2000, 15 ICSID Rev.—FILJ 530 (2000).

9 Fedax N.V. v. Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/96/3), Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction of July 11, 1997, 37 ILM 1378 (1998).

10 Atlantic Triton Company Limited v. People's Revolutionary Republic of Guinea (ICSID Case No. ARB/84/1), Award of April 21, 1986, English translation of French original in 3 ICSID Reports 13 (1995).

11 Report of the Executive Directors on the ICSID Convention, 1 ICSID Reports, at 28; and comments thereon by Christoph H. Schreuer, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (2001), at 121-134.

12 Witness Statement of Mr. Peter Harding, Par. 11, Appendix 2 to Claimant's Counter Memorial on Jurisdiction; Request for Arbitration and Memorials on Jurisdiction, Vol. I, p. 354.

13 Fedax N.V. v. Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/96/3), Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction of July 11, 1997, 37 ILM 1378 (1998).

14 Alcoa Minerals of Jamaica, Inc. v. Jamaica (ICSID Case No. ARB/74/2), Decision on Jurisdiction and Competence of July 6, 1975, 4 Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 206 (1979) (excerpts); and see also the comment by Carolyn B. Lamm, Jurisdiction of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 6 ICSID Rev.—FILJ 462 at 475.

15 Amco Asia Corporation and others v. Republic of Indonesia (ICSID Case No. ARB/81/1), Adhoc Committee Decision of May 16, 1986, 1 ICSID Reports 503 (1993); and see also the comment by Carolyn B. Lamm, 6 ICSID Rev.—FILJ 462 at 475.

16 SGS Société Générale de Surveillance S.A. v. Republic of the Philippines (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/6), Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction of January 29, 2004, available at http://www.worldbank.org/icsid/cases/SGSvPhil-final.pdf.

17 I.F.I. Shihata and A. Parra, The Experience of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 14 ICSID Rev.— FILJ 299 (1999) at 308 and note 27.

18 Christoph H. Schreuer, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (2001), at 140.

19 For the Egyptian foreign investment legislation, authorization and incentives see generally www.gafinet.org.

20 The offer of a variety of Longwall mining equipment by Joy can be seen at www.joy.com/products/longwall.html.

21 United Nations Convention On Contracts For The International Sale Of Goods, 1980.

22 Lagarde, Paul, L'internationalité du point de vue de I'ordre international. Revue Lamy Droit des Affaires, No. 46 (February 2002);Google Scholar Kahn, Philippe, L'internationalité du point de vue de I'ordre transnational, Revue Lamy Droit des Affaires, No. 46 (February 2002);Google Scholar Witz, Claude, L'internationalité et le contrat, Revue Lamy Droit des Affaires, No. 46 (February 2002).Google Scholar

23 Grigera Naon, Horacio A., El Estado y el Arbitraje International con Particulares, Revista Jurídica de Buenos Aires (1989), II, III; Eduardo Silva Romero, ICC Arbitration and State Contracts, International Court of Arbitration, Bulletin, Vol. 13, No. 1, (Spring 2002).Google Scholar

24 Fedax N.V. v. Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/96/3), Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction of July 11, 1997, 5 ICSID Reports 186 (2002), para. 42 (footnotes omitted).

25 Compańa de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/3), Decision on application for annulment, July 3, 2002, 41 ILM 1135 (2002).

26 Lauder v. Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Final Award of September 3, 2001

27 Alex Genin and others v. Republic of Estonia (ICSID Case No. ARB/99/2), Award of June 25, 2001, available at http:// www.worldbank.org/icsid/cases/genin.pdf.

28 Compańa de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/3), Award of November 21, 2000, 16 ICSID Rev.—FILJ 641 (2001).

29 Wena Hotels Ltd. v. Egypt (ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4), Decision on Application for Annulment rendered on February 5, 2002, 41 ILM 933 (2002).

30 Prosper Weil, Problèmes relatifs aux Contrats passés entre un Etat et un Particulier, Recueil des Cours de l'Académie de Droit International, 1969, III, 5-240, at 145.

31 Wena Hotels Ltd. v. Egypt (ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4), Decision on Application for Annulment rendered on February 5, 2002, 41 ILM 933 (2002), paras. 31, 35 (parenthesis added).

32 Lauder v. Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Final Award of September 3, 2001, paras. 161, 163.

33 Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/3), Decision on application for annulment, July 3, 2002, 41 ILM 1135 (2002), para. 113.

34 CMS Gas Transmission Company v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8), Decision on Jurisdiction of July 17, 2003, 42 ILM 788 (2003), para. 80; Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12), Decision on Jurisdiction of December 8, 2003, para. 89, International Law in Brief (Dec. 2003), available at http://www.asil.org/ilib/azurix.pdf.

35 SGS Société Générale de Surveillance S.A. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13), Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction of August 6, 2003, 18 ICSID Rev.—FIU 301 (2003), para. 162.

36 SGS Société Générale de Surveillance S.A. v. Republic of the Philippines (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/6), Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction of January 29, 2004, available at http://www.worldbank.org/icsid/cases/SGSvPhil-final.pdf, para. 163.

37 Guaranties bancaires et procédure arbitrale, Cautions et garanties bancaires, Lamy, Décembre 2002, Division ñ9, Article 501.

38 Lanco International, Inc. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/6), Preliminary Decision on Jurisdiction of December 8, 1998 (English text), 40 ILM 457 (2001).

39 Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12), Decision on Jurisdiction of December 8, 2003, International Law in Brief (Dec. 2003), available at http://www.asil.org/ilib/azurix.pdf.

40 Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/3), Decision on application for annulment, July 3, 2002, 41 ILM 1135 (2002), para. 98.

41 .Id. para.101.

42 .Southern Pacific Properties (Middle East) Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No. ARB/84/3) 3 ICSID Reports (1995) at 45-336.

43 Transcript of the Hearing held on Monday 29th March, 2004, Statement by Counsel for the Respondent, Professor Ahmed S. El- Kosheri, at 37-38, as amended by the Respondent.

44 Permanenet Court Of International Justice ,Eastern Greenland Case,1933,PCIJ,Ser.A/B,No.53,at 52.

45 International Court of Justice, Nuclear Tests case, ICJ Reports 1974, at 253.

46 Tribunal Arbitral instituépar le compromis du 23 Octobre 1985 entre le Canada et la France: differend concernant le filetage a l'intérieur du Golfe de Saint-Laurent, Sentence du 17 Juillet 1986, Revue G én érale de Droit International Public, 1986/3, 713-786, p. 756.