Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T21:17:44.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Court of Justice: Judgment in the Appeal Relating to the Jurisdiction of the ICAO Council (India v. Pakistan)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 11 , Issue 5 , September 1972 , pp. 1080 - 1092
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

[Reproduced from the text provided by the International Court of Justice.

[By 13 votes to 3, the Court rejected the Government of Pakistan’s objections on the question of its competence and found that it had jurisdiction to entertain India’s appeal. By 14 votes to 2, it held the Council of the International Civil Aviation Organization to be competent to entertain the Application and Complaint of the Government of Pakistan, and in consequence rejected the appeal made to the Court by India against the decision of the Council assuming jurisdiction in those respects.

[President Zafrulla Khan and Judge Lachs appended Declarations to the Judgment. Judges Petrén, Onyeama, Dillard, de Castro and Jimenéz de Aréchaga appended Separate Opinions. Judge Morozov and Judge ad hoc Nagendra Singh appended Dissenting Opinions. None of these have been re-produced in I.L.M.]

References

* [Reproduced from the text provided by the International Court of Justice.

[By 13 votes to 3, the Court rejected the Government of Pakistan’s objections on the question of its competence and found that it had jurisdiction to entertain India’s appeal. By 14 votes to 2, it held the Council of the International Civil Aviation Organization to be competent to entertain the Application and Complaint of the Government of Pakistan, and in consequence rejected the appeal made to the Court by India against the decision of the Council assuming jurisdiction in those respects.

[President Zafrulla Khan and Judge Lachs appended Declarations to the Judgment. Judges Petrén, Onyeama, Dillard, de Castro and Jimenéz de Aréchaga appended Separate Opinions. Judge Morozov and Judge ad hoc Nagendra Singh appended Dissenting Opinions. None of these have been re-produced in I.L.M.]