Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T12:13:10.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

United Nations Security Council Resolution 2288

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2017

Kristen Boon
Kristen Boon*
Affiliation:
Professor of Law, Seton Hall Law School. Thanks to Krista Shaheen for her research assistance.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Legal Documents
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 56 , Issue 4 , August 2017 , pp. 824 - 828
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by The American Society of International Law 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ENDNOTES

1 UNMIL Background, United Nations, at http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/unmil/background.shtml (visited May 29, 2017).

2 Enrico Carisch & Loraine Rickard-Martin, Implementation of United Nations Targeted Sanctions, in Targeted Sanctions: The Impacts and Effectiveness of United Nations Action 150 (Thomas Biersteker et al. eds., 2016) (noting that sanctions were accompanied by a peacekeeping mission, mediation, international judicial prosecutions, financial aid, and micromanagement of all vital government functions, all of which was unprecedented and required strong politico-economic management).

3 S.C. Res. 1521 ¶¶ 2, 4 (Dec. 22, 2013).

4 S.C. Res. 1532 ¶ 1 (Mar. 12, 2004).

5 S.C. Res. 1683 ¶¶ 1, 2 (June 13, 2006).

6 S.C. Res. 1903 ¶¶ 3–5 (Dec. 17, 2009). For commentary, see UN Arms Embargo on Liberia, Stockholm Int'l Peace Res. Inst., at https://www.sipri.org/databases/embargoes/un_arms_embargoes/liberia (May 27, 2016).

7 Id. ¶¶ 6, 10.

8 S.C. Res. 1521, supra note 3, ¶¶ 7, 13.

9 Jeremy Matam Farrall, United Nations Sanctions and the Rule of Law 1, 420 (2007).

10 Global Witness, Cautiously Optimistic: The Case for Maintaining Sanctions in Liberia (June 2006), at https://www.globalpolicy.org/images/pdfs/06cautiously.pdf.

11 Farrall, supra note 9, at 421 (2007).

12 Rebecca Brubaker & Dr. Thomas Dörfler, How Can Sanctions Contribute to the Prevention of (Intra-state) Conflict?, 10 (draft on file with author); S.C. Res. 1753 (Apr. 27, 2007); S.C. Res. 1689 (June 20, 2006).

13 Brubaker & Dörfler, supra note 12.

14 S.C. Res. 2237 (Sept. 2, 2015).

15 Brubaker & Dörfler, supra note 12.

16 Gary Wilson, Collective Security, Threats to the Peace, and the Ebola Outbreak, 6 J. Phil. Int'l L. 1, 17 (2015).

17 Security Council, Letter Dated 19 November 2014 from the Panel of Experts on Liberia, UN Doc. S/2014/831, ¶¶ 13, 31 (Nov. 19, 2014).

18 Kristen E. Boon, U.N. Sanctions as Regulation, 15 Chinese J. Int'l L. 543 (2016).

19 Id.

20 Kristen Boon, Obligations of the New Occupier: The Contours of a Jus Post Bellum, 31 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev 57 (2009) (on the concept of jus post bellum).

21 Farrall, supra note 9, citing Security Council, Letter Dated 1 June 2004 from the Chairman of the Security Council Committee, UN Doc. S/2004/396, ¶ 127 (June 1, 2004); Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force, UN Doc. S/2005/379, ¶ 146 (June 10, 2005); Security Council, Letter Dated 13 June 2005 from the Chairman of the Security Council Committee, UN Doc. S/2005/360, ¶ 46 (June 13, 2005).

22 Andrea Charron, UN Sanctions and Conflict: Responding to Peace and Security Threats 80–81 (2011) (“In the Panel's opinion, the critical issue was now not whether sanctions should be lifted but rather how the post-conflict situation could be managed so that sanctions were no longer required.”).

23 See Thomas Biersteker, Sue Eckert & Marcos Tourinho, Designing United Nations Targeted Sanctions: Evaluating Impacts and Effectiveness of UN Targeted Sanctions, Targeted Sanctions Consortium (TSC) (August 2012), 23, at http://graduateinstitute.ch/files/live/sites/iheid/files/sites/internationalgovernance/shared/PSIG_images/Sanctions/Designing%20UN%20Targeted%20Sanctions.pdf.

24 This argument is developed in my book chapter on terminating UN sanctions. Kristen Boon, Timing Matters: Termination Policies on UN Sanctions, in Handbook on UN Sanctions (L. Van den Herik ed., forthcoming 2017).

25 S.C. Res. 1521, supra note 3.

26 See generally Boon, supra note 24.