Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T21:04:57.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hierarchy and Judicial Institutions: Arbitration and Ideology in the Hellenistic World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2015

Eric Grynaviski  and
Amy Hsieh
Get access

Abstract

International arbitration is a distinctive feature of both contemporary international politics and the ancient world. Explanations of arbitration in the international relations literature generally posit that states engage in arbitration to mitigate the effects of competition in an anarchical system, or that the practice of arbitration reflects democratic norms. However, an examination of arbitration during the paradigmatic case of the Hellenistic period (338–90 bce) casts doubt on the existing literature. Hierarchy rather than anarchy better characterizes the political context in which arbitration took place: the Greeks often organized themselves into alliances or leagues in which a hegemon dominated decision making, or into federal states with a common foreign policy. This hierarchical setting was a necessary condition for international arbitration where the practice of arbitration was a tool to legitimize hierarchical powers. We assemble an original data set of Hellenistic arbitrations, and use qualitative comparative analysis to show that hierarchy was almost always a necessary condition for international arbitration. Process-tracing of arbitration under three political orders—hegemonic kingdoms in the Greek world, Greek federations, and the Roman Empire—shows that arbitration as a particular means of dispute resolution was used as an ideological device to build and legitimize international order. We then analyze the contemporary record, finding a role for hierarchy in modern international arbitration.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 69 , Issue 3 , Summer 2015 , pp. 697 - 729
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ager, Sheila L. 1996. Interstate Arbitrations in the Greek World, 337–90 BC. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Allee, Todd L., and Huth, Paul K.. 2006. Legitimizing Dispute Settlement: International Legal Rulings as Domestic Political Cover. American Political Science Review 100 (2):219–34.Google Scholar
Arrian. 2010. The Landmark Arrian: The Campaigns of Alexander. Translated by Mensch, Pamela, edited by Romm, James. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Asouzu, Amazu A. 2001. International Commercial Arbitration and African States: Practice, Participation, and Institutional Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bacevich, Andrew J. 2002. American Empire: The Realities and Consequences of US Diplomacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1959. Rome and Antiochus the Great. Classical Philology 54 (2):81–99.Google Scholar
Beckman, Gary. 1999. Hittite Diplomatic Texts. 2nd ed. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Billows, Richard A. 1990. Antigonus the One-Eyed and the Creation of the Hellenistic State. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Boak, A.E.R. 1921. Greek Interstate Associations and the League of Nations. American Journal of International Law 15 (3):375–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, A.B. 1980. Alexander and the Iranians. Journal of Hellenic Studies 100:1–21.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braumoeller, Bear, and Goertz, Gary. 2000. The Methodology of Necessary Conditions. American Journal of Political Science 44 (4):844–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G., and Wohlforth, William C.. 2008. World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bryce, James. 1901. Studies in History and Jurisprudence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buckler, John. 1980. The Theban Hegemony, 371–362 BC. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burley, Anne-Marie, and Mattli, Walter. 1993. Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration. International Organization 47 (1):41–76.Google Scholar
Cattaruzza, Marina, and Langewiesche, Dieter. 2013. Contexualizing Territorial Revisionism in East Central Europe: Goals, Expectations, Practices. In Territorial Revisionism and the Allies of Germany in the Second World War, edited by Cattaruzza, Marina and Dyroff, Stefan, 1–16. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, Angelos. 2005. War in the Hellenistic World: A Social and Cultural History. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coates, Benjamin. 2014. The Pan-American Lobbyist: William Eleroy Curtis and US Empire, 1884–1899. Diplomatic History 38 (1):22–48.Google Scholar
Coates, Benjamin. Forthcoming. Securing Hegemony Through Law: Venezuela, the US Asphalt Trust, and the Uses of International Law, 1904–1909. Journal of American History 102.Google Scholar
Collins, Andrew W. 2012. The Royal Costume and Insignia of Alexander the Great. American Journal of Philology 133 (3):371–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooley, Alexander. 2005. Logics of Hierarchy: The Organization of Empires, States, and Military Occupations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cooley, Alexander, and Nexon, Daniel H.. 2013. “The Empire Will Compensate You”: The Structural Dynamics of the US Overseas Basing Network. Perspectives on Politics 11 (4):1034–50.Google Scholar
Cox, Michael. 2005. Empire by Denial: The Strange Case of the United States. International Affairs 81 (1):15–30.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W. 1996. Approaches to World Order. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cronin, Bruce. 2001. The Paradox of Hegemony: America's Ambiguous Relationship with the United Nations. European Journal of International Relations 7 (1):103–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Christina L. 2012. Why Adjudicate? Enforcing Trade Rules in the WTO. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dempsey, Paul. 2004. Flights of Fancy and Fights of Fury: Arbitration and Adjudication of Commercial and Political Disputes in International Aviation. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 32 (2):231–305.Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel H. 1995. The Philadelphian System: Sovereignty, Arms Control, and Balance of Power in the American States-Union, Circa 1787–1861. International Organization 49 (2):191–228.Google Scholar
Dion, Douglas. 1998. Evidence and Inference in the Comparative Case Study. Comparative Politics 30 (2):127–45.Google Scholar
Dmitriev, Sviatoslav. 2011. The Greek Slogan of Freedom and Early Roman Politics in Greece. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Domke, Martin. 1959. The Israeli-Soviet Oil Arbitration. American Journal of International Law 53 (4):787–806.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2009. Rethinking Political Structures: From “Ordering Principles” to “Vertical Differentiation”—and Beyond. International Theory 1 (1):49–86.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael. 1986. Empires. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Arthur M. 1987. Senate and General: Individual Decision Making and Roman Foreign Relations, 264–194 BC. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, Arthur M. 2008. Rome Enters the Greek East: From Anarchy to Hierarchy in the Hellenistic Mediterranean, 230–170 BC. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ferguson, W.S. 1948. Demetrius Poliorcetes and the Hellenic League. Hesperia 17 (2):112–36.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2003. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs About the Use of Force. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Edward A. 1893. History of Federal Government in Greece and Italy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fry, James D. 2008. Arbitrating Arms Control Disputes. Stanford Journal of International Law 44 (2):359–421.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1995. The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union. International Organization 49 (1):171–81Google Scholar
Gent, Stephen E. 2013. The Politics of International Arbitration and Adjudication. Penn State Journal of Law and International Affairs 2 (1):66–77.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and McAdams, Richard H.. 2003. Adjudicating in Anarchy: An Expressive Theory of International Dispute Resolution. William and Mary Law Review 45 (4):1229–339.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Levy, Jack S.. 2007. Causal Explanations, Necessary Conditions, and Case Studies. In Explaining War and Peace: Case Studies and Necessary Condition Counterfactuals, edited by Goertz, Gary and Levy, Jack S., 9–45. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grainger, John D. 2002. The Roman War of Antiochus the Great. Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Christine, and Kingsbury, Benedict. 1993. Developments in Dispute Settlement: Inter-State Arbitration Since 1945. British Yearbook of International Law 63 (1):97–134.Google Scholar
Gruber, Lloyd. 2000. Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gruen, Erich S. 1984. The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome. Vols. 1–2. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Grynaviski, Eric. 2013. Contrasts, Counterfactuals, and Causes. European Journal of International Relations 19 (4):823–46.Google Scholar
Hammond, N.G.L. 1994. Philip of Macedon. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, N.G.L., and Walbank, F.W.. 1988. A History of Macedonia. Vol. 3, 336–167 BC. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Christopher. 2005. Edwin F. Atkins and the Evolution of United States Cuba Policy, 1894–1902. New England Quarterly 78 (2):202–31.Google Scholar
Harris, William V. 1979. War and Imperialism in Republican Rome: 327–70 BC. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hemmer, Christopher, and Katzenstein, Peter J.. 2002. Why Is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism. International Organization 56 (3):575–607.Google Scholar
Hines, Jonathan H. 1989. Dispute Resolution and Choice of Law in United States–Soviet Trade. Brooklyn Journal of International Law 15 (3):591–640.Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. 1993. Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System. Salem, NH: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 1999. Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics. International Organization 53 (2):379–408.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2007. After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2011. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jarvis, Robert M. 1985. Soviet Maritime Arbitration Commission: A Practitioner's Perspective. Texas International Law Journal 21: 341–61.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Translated by Gaines, Jeremy and Keast, Paul. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Joireman, Sandra Fullerton. 2001. Inherited Legal Systems and Effective Rule of Law: Africa and the Colonial Legacy. Journal of Modern African Studies 39 (4):571–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, David C. 2010. Hierarchy and Legitimacy in International Systems: The Tribute System in Early Modern East Asia. Security Studies 19 (4):591–22.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
King-Smith, Sandford B. 1969. Communist Foreign-Trade Arbitration. Harvard International Law Journal 10:34–100.Google Scholar
Kramer, Samuel Noah. 1963. The Sumerians: Their History, Culture, and Character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1991. Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier. World Politics 43 (3):336–66.Google Scholar
LaFeber, Walter. 1983. Inevitable Revolutions: The United States in Central America. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 1996. Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations. International Organization 50 (1):1–33.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2007. Escape from the State of Nature: Authority and Hierarchy in World Politics. International Security 32 (1):47–79.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2013. Legitimating Power: The Domestic Politics of US International Hierarchy. International Security 38 (2):74–111.Google Scholar
Larsen, Jakob A.O. 1935. Was Greece Free Between 196 and 146 BC.? Classical Philology 30 (3):193–214.Google Scholar
Larsen, Jakob A.O. 1968. Greek Federal States: Their Institutions and History. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Layne, Christopher, and Thayer, Bradley A.. 2007. American Empire: A Debate. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lobingier, Charles S. 1905. Blending Legal Systems in the Philippines. Law Quarterly Review 21:401–07.Google Scholar
Lund, Helen S. 1992. Lysimachus: A Study in Early Hellenistic Kingship. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2008. Toward a Unified Theory of Causality. Comparative Political Studies 41 (4–5):412–36.Google Scholar
Mann, Kristin, and Roberts, Richard L, eds. 1991. Law in Colonial Africa. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter. 2001. Private Justice in a Global Economy: From Litigation to Arbitration. International Organization 55 (4):919–47.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter, and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1995. Law and Politics in the European Union: A Reply to Garrett. International Organization 49 (1):183–90.Google Scholar
McAdams, Richard H. 2008. Beyond the Prisoners' Dilemma: Coordination, Game Theory, and Law. Southern California Law Review 82:209–58.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John. 1994. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19 (3):5–49.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen. 1991. The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique. Review of International Studies 17 (1):67–85.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans. 1967. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 4th ed. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Muller, Sabine. 2010. Philip II. In A Companion to Ancient Macedonia, edited by Roisman, Joseph and Worthington, Ian, 166–87. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Murray, William M. 2012. The Age of Titans: The Rise and Fall of the Great Hellenistic Navies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel H. 2008. What's This, Then? “Romanes Eunt Domus”? International Studies Perspectives 9 (3):300–8.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1999. Coping with Tragedies of the Commons. Annual Review of Political Science 2:493–535.Google Scholar
Pechota, Vratislav. 1987. International Economic Arbitration in the USSR and Eastern Europe. New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law 8 (3):377–400.Google Scholar
Piccirilli, Luigi. 1973. Gli Arbitrati Interstatali Greci. Pisa, Italy: Marlin.Google Scholar
Polybius, . 2012. The Histories: Books 16–27. Translated by Paton, W.R. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, Bernard. 2006. Empire and Superempire: Britain, America and the World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rector, Chad. 2009. Federations: The Political Dynamics of Cooperation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 1999. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2004. American Power and World Order. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2007. International Crises of Legitimacy. International Politics 44 (2–3):157–74.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John. 1992. Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution. International Organization 46(3):561–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, Edward W. 1979. Orientalism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Samuels, Susan E. 1985. The Soviet Position on International Arbitration. Virginia Journal of International Law 26 (2):417–54.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carsten, and Wagemann, Claudius. 2012. Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharman, J.C. 2012. International Hierarchies and Contemporary Imperial Governance: A Tale of Three Kingdoms. European Journal of International Relations 19 (2):189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2002. Capacity, Commitment, and Compliance: International Institutions and Territorial Disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (6):829–56.Google Scholar
Smit, Hans. 1986. The Future of International Commercial Arbitration: A Single Transnational Institution. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 25:9–34.Google Scholar
Sohn, Louis B. 1982. The Role of Arbitration in Recent International Multilateral Treaties. Virginia Journal of International Law 23 (2):171–89.Google Scholar
Stuyt, Alexander M. 1990. Survey of International Arbitrations: 1794–1989. 3rd ed. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Thucydides. 1996. The Landmark Thucydides: A Comprehensive Guide to the Peloponnesian War, edited by Strassler, Robert B.. Translated by Crawley, Richard. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Vidmar, Srecko. 2002. Compulsory Inter-State Arbitration of Territorial Disputes. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 31 (1):87–111.Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2007. The Politics of International Judicial Appointments: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights. International Organization 61 (4):669–701.Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2008. The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights. American Political Science Review 102 (4):417–33.Google Scholar
Waterfield, Robin. 2011. Dividing the Spoils: The War for Alexander the Great's Empire. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Katja. 2000. Hierarchy Amidst Anarchy: Transaction Costs and Institutional Choice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Westermann, W.L. 1907. Interstate Arbitration in Antiquity. Classical Journal 2 (5):197–211.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1972. International Legitimacy. International Relations 4 (1):1–28.Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William C., Little, Richard, Kaufman, Stuart J., Kang, David, Jones, Charles A., Hui, Victoria Tin-Bor, Eckstein, Arthur, Deudney, Daniel, and Brenner, William L.. 2007. Testing Balance-of-Power Theory in World History. European Journal of International Relations 13 (2):155–85.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Grynaviski and Hsieh supplementary material

Grynaviski and Hsieh supplementary material 1

Download Grynaviski and Hsieh supplementary material(File)
File 17.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Grynaviski and Hsieh supplementary material

Grynaviski and Hsieh supplementary material 2

Download Grynaviski and Hsieh supplementary material(File)
File 28.1 KB