Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T09:15:23.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Middle Powers in the United Nations System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

G. Det. Glazebrook
Affiliation:
Professor of History at the University of Toronto, served during the war with the Department of External Affairs of Canada. He is the author of Canadian External Relationsand Canada at the Paris Peace Conference.
Get access

Extract

The term “middle power” is a convenient one that has come into general use as a means of avoiding the unreality of a simple division of states into “great” and “small”. While attempts to find a yardstick for the measurement of states have been fruitless, there can be some agreement on the categories. For practical purposes the great powers at the present time are those which hold permanent seats on the Security Council, just as during the war they were those which participated in the meetings of heads of government on high policial and military policy. There are clearly also a number of smaller states which, because of limited resources or small population, or both, are commonly ranked as small powers. In between lie a number of countries which make no claim to the title of great power, but have been shown to be capable of exerting a degree of strength and influence not found in the small powers. These are the middle powers. There is no agreed list because, while there is a fixed, if arbitrary, boundary between them and the great powers, there are, as it were, marginal powers which might be classified as “middle” or “small”. Probably, however, the following members of the United Nations would generally be recognized as middle powers: in Europe — Belgium, the Netherlands, and Poland; in the Americas — Argentina, Brazil, Canada, and Mexico; in the Pacific — Australia, and India.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mosely, Philip E., “Peace-making, 1946”International Organization, I, February, 1947.Google Scholar

2 The balance has slightly changed in 1947 with the election of Colombia, Syria, and Belgium to replace Egypt, Mexico and the Netherlands.