Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T23:42:39.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Balance-Sheet of the League Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Get access

Extract

International Organization, no longer the exclusive preserve of dreamers and idealists, is now, for better or for worse, one of the palpable realities of world politics. Whether we choose to consider it our best hope or a snare and a delusion or something in between, we are compelled to reckon with its effects, one of which is the foreseeable cost of non-participation in it. Its characteristic features – public debate, parliamentary procedures and resolution, majorities and voting blocs – all have become instruments of undeniable and indeed often painful efficacy in international relations. A review conference for the purpose of evaluating the experience of the first ten years of Charter operations is scheduled for 1955. Meanwhile, institutional developments within the framework of the Charter occur constantly, and call for policy decisions based on a profound understanding of how this or that change is likely to affect the international scene. In this situation, the publication of the first comprehensive history of the League of Nations must be considered a significant event.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Walters, F. P., A History of the League of Nations (London: Oxford University Press, 1952), 2 volsGoogle Scholar.

2 See Goodrich, Leland M., “From League of Nations to United Nations”, International Organization, I, p. 321Google Scholar.

3 It would be particularly important to carry on this kind of research with respect to cases under the United Nations, especially the entirely new experience of the Korean action which, of course, lies beyond the scope of this article.

4 The term, in its proper use, is taken to con note not a mere physical equation of forces, but a mutual understanding about, and acceptance of, the relation between national aspirations and the capacity to realize them in view of other nations' capacity and will to resist. Such a condition is not incompatible with inequality of military strength.

5 See Keeton, and Schwarzenberger, , Making International Law Work (1939), chapter IIIGoogle Scholar; and Corbett, Percy, Law and Society in the Relations of States (1951), p. 8687Google Scholar.