Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Johnston, Andrew M.
2017.
A Companion To Dwight D. Eisenhower.
p.
73.
Article contents
Early Stages in the Organization of “Shape”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 May 2009
Extract
Thousands of words have been written on “strains within NATO” and the “conflicts of interest” which attend any international organization. For several years—almost from its inception—various prognoses have been made as to how soon NATO or its subordinate agencies would fly apart from the centrifugal forces of diverging self-interest. As early as 1953 General Gruenther warned that with the recovery of self-confidence, the cohesive glue of fear would have less effect. Yet, as Secretary Dulles stated last spring at Copenhagen, we are often inclined to ignore the successes of NATO and to concentrate on its problems.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The IO Foundation 1959
References
1 Goodpaster, Andrew J., “The Development of SHAPE: 1950–1953,” International Organization, 05 1955 (Vol. 9, No. 2), p. 258CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Spaak, Paul-Henri, “The Atlantic Community and NATO,” Orbis, Winter 1958 (Vol. 1, No. 4), p. 412Google Scholar.
3 “NORAD's Classic Example,” Time, 05 19, 1958 (Vol. 71, No. 20), p. 15Google Scholar.
4 Goodpaster, , op. cit., p. 257–262Google Scholar, and Wood, Robert J., “The First Years of SHAPE,” International Organization, 05 1952 (Vol. 6, No. 2), p. 175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Even the French had only limited representation in SHAEF during World War II. General Eisenhower called SHAEF and its predecessor COSSAC (Chief of Staff to the Supreme Allied Commander) “a staff composed of both United States and British personnel”. Eisenhower, Dwight D., Report by the Supreme Commander to the Combined Chiefs of Staff on the Operations in Europe of the Allied Expeditionary Force, p. 1, 122Google Scholar.
6 William A. Bailey, Principles and Procedures in Combined Joint Planning Activities, mimeographed pamphlet.
7 Ibid., p. 13–14.
8 Ibid., p. 19.
9 Ibid., p. 15–17.
10 Ibid., p. 16.
11 Royal Institute of International Affairs, Defence in the Cold War, London, Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1950, p. 63Google Scholar.
12 Ismay, Lord, NATO; the First Five Years, 1949–1954, paris, NATO, 1954, p. 38Google Scholar.
13 British Information Services, Western Co-operation—A Reference Handbook, p. 46Google Scholar.
14 SHAPE, Chronology and Organization of Allied Command Europe, Paris, SHAPE, 06 30, 1957, p.4Google Scholar.
15 Ismay, , op. cit., p. 30Google Scholar.
16 SHAPE, General Orders Number I, 03 2, 1951Google Scholar.
17 Goodpaster, , op. cit., p. 257Google Scholar.
18 Ismay, , op. cit., p. 37Google Scholar.
19 Wood, , op. cit., p. 190Google Scholar.
20 The New York Times, March 4, 1951, p. E5.
21 Ibid., March 21, 1951, p. 6.
22 Ibid., March 4, 1951, p. E5.
23 Ibid., March 7, 1951, p. 13.
24 From a letter to the author, dated March 12, 1951.
25 Wood, , op. cit., p. 178Google Scholar.
26 Ibid., p. 182.
27 SHAPE, General Orders Number 3, 04 2, 1951Google Scholar.
28 White, Theodore, Fire In The Ashes, New York, William Sloane, 1953, p. 359Google Scholar.
29 Eisenhower, Dwight D., First Annual Report—Supreme Allied Commander Europe, p. 11Google Scholar.
30 Ryerson, Donald S., “Language Teaching in NATO”. Western World, 04 1958 (No. 12), p. 63–65Google Scholar.
31 From the original paper, in possession of the author.
32 Pelletier, George E., The Ridgway Regime at SHAPE, unpublished M.A. essay for Georgetown University, 1955, on file at Georgetown and in the Army Library in the Pentagon, p. 101–102Google Scholar.
33 The New York Times, July 9, 1952, p. 5.
34 Warne, James Douglas, N.A.T.O. and its Prospects, New York, Praeger, 1954, p. 72–75Google Scholar.
35 Ibid., p. 73.
36 Ibid.
- 1
- Cited by