Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T10:28:15.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The right to intervene or the obligation to react?What can be done to ensure respect for the rights of the individual in the light of the principle of non-intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2010

Denise Plattner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Books and Reviews
Information
International Review of the Red Cross (1961 - 1997) , Volume 34 , Issue 298 , February 1994 , pp. 83 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre, Droit d'ingérence ou obligation de réaction? Les possibilités d'action visant à assurer le respect des droits de la personne face au principe de non-intervention, Emile Bruylant, Burssels, 1992, 283 pp. (Collection de droit international).Google Scholar

2 Contrary to what the authors state on p. 4 of their book, the Additional Protocols have no common Article 1. The provision in question is Article 1, para. 1, of Protocol I.