Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T05:12:40.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Islamic law and international humanitarian law: An introduction to the main principles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2018

Abstract

This article gives an overview of the principles regulating the use of force under the Islamic law of war in the four Sunni schools of Islamic law. By way of introducing the topic, it briefly discusses the origins, sources and characteristics of the Islamic law of war. The discussion reveals the degree of compatibility between these Islamic principles and the modern principles of international humanitarian law, and offers insights into how these Islamic principles can help in limiting the devastation and suffering caused by contemporary armed conflicts in Muslim contexts, particularly those conflicts in which Islamic law is invoked as the source of reference.

Type
Law and protection
Copyright
Copyright © icrc 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and should not be interpreted as official positions of the ICRC. The author would like to thank Ellen Policinski for her meticulous reading, comments and suggestions for this article, as well as the anonymous peer reviewers.

References

1 United Nations, “Secretary-General's Opening Remarks at World Humanitarian Summit”, 23 May 2016, available at: www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2016-05-23/secretary-general%E2%80%99s-opening-remarks-world-humanitarian-summit (all internet references were accessed in May 2018) .

2 ICRC, “Niger: Seminar on Islamic Law and Humanitarianism”, news release, 25 November 2015, available at: www.icrc.org/en/document/niger-seminar-islamic-law-humanitarianism.

3 ICRC, “Egypt: Continuous Humanitarian Dialogue between the ICRC and Al-Azhar”, news release, 24 October 2017, available at: www.icrc.org/en/document/egypt-grand-imam-dr-ahmed-al-tayyeb-al-azhar-willing-support-humanitarians.

4 See Ṣubḥī al-Ṣāliḥ, Maʻālim al-Sharīʻah al-Islāmiyyah, Dār al-ʻIlm lil-Malāyīn, Beirut, 1975, p. 62.

5 Editor's note: For the purposes of this article, the term “the Islamic state” refers to the State founded by the Muslims during the seventh century.

6 See Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad al-Sarakhsī, Kitāb al-Mabsūt, Vol. 10, Dār al-Maʻrifah, Beirut, p. 2.

7 See Al-Dawoody, Ahmed, The Islamic Law of War: Justifications and Regulations, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2011, pp. 1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 As discussed below, the jurists gave conflicting rulings regarding the permissibility of, for example, targeting women, children or the aged if they engage in hostilities, and the use of certain means and methods of warfare.

9 Peters, Rudolph, Jihad in Classical and Modern Islam, Markus Wiener, Princeton, NJ, 1996, p. 119Google Scholar; El Fadl, Khaled Abou, “The Rules of Killing at War: An Inquiry into Classical Sources”, The Muslim World, Vol. 89, No. 2, 1999, p. 150Google Scholar; El Fadl, Khaled Abou, “Islam and the Theology of Power”, Middle East Report, No. 221, Winter 2001, p. 30Google Scholar; Mayer, Ann Elizabeth, “War and Peace in the Islamic Tradition and International Law”, in Kelsay, John and James Turner Johnson (eds), Just War and Jihad: Historical and Theoretical Perspectives on War and Peace in Western and Islamic Traditions, Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, 1991, p. 197Google Scholar; Hashmi, Sohail H., “Saving and Taking Life in War: Three Modern Muslim Views”, The Muslim World, Vol. 89, No. 2, 1999, p. 158CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 See Green, L. C., The Contemporary Law of Armed Conflict, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1993, pp. 18 ffGoogle Scholar.

11 For further information see, A. Al-Dawoody, above note 7, pp. 149–183; Al-Dawoody, Ahmed, “Al-Sarakhsī’s Contribution to the Islamic Law of War”, UCLA Journal of Islamic and Near Eastern Law, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2015, pp. 3743Google Scholar.

12 Qur'an 2:190.

13 Muḥammad ibn ʻUmar al-Rāzī, Tafsīr al-Fakhr al-Rāzī: Al-Mushtahar bi-al-Tafsīr al-Kabīr wa-Mafātīh ạl-Ghayb, Vol. 5, Dār al-Fikr, 1981, p. 138Google Scholar.

14 Aḥmad ʻAbd al-Raḥmān al-Bannā al-Sāʻatī, Badā’iʻ al-Manan fi Jamiʻ wa Tartīb Musannad al-Shafiʻi wa al-Sanan: Mudhayla bi-al-Qawl al-Ḥasan Sharaḥ Badā’iʻ al-Manan, 2nd ed., Vol. 2, Maktabah al-Furqān, Cairo, 1983, p. 12Google Scholar.

15 Sadīq ibn Ḥasan ibn ʻAli al-Ḥusseini al-Qannūji al-Bukhārī Abū al-Ṭayyib, Al-Rawḍah al-Nadiyyah Sharaḥ al-Durar al-Munīryyah, Vol. 2, Idārah al-Ṭibāʻah al-Munīrīyah, Cairo, p. 339Google Scholar.

16 Ibid.

17 ʻAbdullah ibn Abī Shaybah, Al-Kitāb al-Muṣannaf fī al-Aḥādīth wa al-Āthār, Vol. 6, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyyah, Beirut, 1995, p. 478Google Scholar.

18 Aḥmed ibn al-Ḥussein ibn ʻAli al-Bayhaqī, Al-Sunan al-Kubrā, 2nd ed., Vol. 9, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyyah, Beirut, 2003, p. 155Google Scholar.

19 See al-Zuḥaylī, Wahbah, Mawsūʻah al-Fiqh al-Islāmī wa al-Qaḍāyā al-Muʻāṣirah, Vol. 7, Dār al-Fikr, Damascus, 2010, p. 511Google Scholar.

20 For further information on the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, see Zemmali, Ameur, Islam and International Humanitarian Law: Principles on the Conduct of Military Operations, 4th ed., ICRC, 2010, pp. 162163Google Scholar.

21 Protocol Additional (I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, 1125 UNTS 3, 8 June 1977 (entered into force 7 December 1978), Art. 48, available at: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Treaty.xsp?action=openDocument&documentId=D9E6B6264D7723C3C12563CD002D6CE4.

22 See Aḥmad al-Dardīr, Al-Sharḥ al-Kabīr, ed. Muḥammad ʻAllīsh, Vol. 2, Dār al-Fikr, Beirut, p. 176; Aḥmad ibn Idrīs al-Qarāfī, Al-Dhakhīrah, ed. Būkhubzah, Muḥammad, Vol. 3, Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, Beirut, 1994, p. 399Google Scholar; Muḥammad ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī, Kitāb al-Jihād wa Kitāb al-Jizyah wa Aḥkām al-Muḥāribīn min Kitāb Ikhtilāf al-Fuqahā’ li-Abī Jaʻfar Muḥammad Ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī, ed. Schacht, Joseph, Brill, Leiden, 1933, p. 9Google Scholar; al-Samarqandī, ʻAlāʻ al-Dīn, Tuḥfah al-Fuqahā’, Vol. 3, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyyah, Beirut, 1984, p. 295Google Scholar; Ṣaqr, ʻAbd al-ʻAzīz, ʻAl-ʻAlāqāt al-Dawliyyah fī al-Islām Waqt al-Ḥarb: Dirāsah lil-Qawāʻid al-Munaẓẓimah li-Sayr al-Qitāl, Mashrūʻ al-ʻAlāqāt al-Dawliyyah fī al-Islām, No. 6, Al-Maʻhad al-ʻĀlamī lil-Fikr al-Islāmī, Cairo, 1996, pp. 4648Google Scholar; al-Shaykh Niẓām al-Dīn al-Balkhī et al. , Al-Fatāwā al-Hindiyyah: Fī Madhhab al-Imām al-Aʻẓam Abī Ḥanīfah al-Nuʻmān, Vol. 2, Dār al-Fikr, 1991, p. 194Google Scholar.

23 See Muḥammad ibn Ismāʻīl al-Ṣanaʻānī, Subul al-Salām: Sharḥ Bulūgh al-Marām min Adillah al-Aḥkām, ed. Muḥammad ʻAbd al-ʻAzīz al-Khūlī, 4th ed., Vol. 4, Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī, Beirut, 1959, p. 50Google Scholar; Ibrāhīm ibn ʻAlī ibn Yūsuf al-Shirāzī, Al-Muhadhdhab: Fī Fiqh al-Imām al-Shāfiʻī, ed. ʻImīrat, Zakariyyā, Vol. 3, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyyah, Beirut, 1995, pp. 277 ff.Google Scholar; Muḥyī al-Dīn ibn Sharaf al-Nawawī, Al-Majmūʻ: Sharḥ al-Muhadhdhab, ed. Maṭrajī, Maḥmūd, Vol. 21, Dār al-Fikr, Beirut, 2000, p. 55Google Scholar; al-Zuḥaylī, Wahbah, Al-ʻAlāqāt al-Dawliyyah fī al-Islam: Muqāranah bi-al-Qānūn al-Dawlī al-Ḥadīth, Mu'assasah al-Risālah, Beirut, 1981, p. 71Google Scholar; A. Al-Dawoody, above note 7, pp. 112–114.

24 Hashmi, Sohail, “Islamic Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction: An Argument for Nonproliferation”, in Hashmi, Sohail H. and Lee, Steven P. (eds), Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Religious and Secular Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004, p. 329CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Khalīl ibn Isḥāq ibn Musā al-Jundī, Mukhtaṣar Khalīl fī Fiqh Imām Dār al-Hijrah, ed. Aḥmad ʻAlī Ḥarakāt, Dār al-Fikr, Beirut, 1994, p. 102Google Scholar; A. al-Dardīr, above note 22, p. 178; Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad ibn ʻAbd al-Raḥman al-Ḥaṭṭāb, Mawāhib al-Jalīl li-Sharḥ Mukhtaṣar Khalīl, 2nd ed., Vol. 3, Dār al-Fikr, Beirut, 1977, p. 352Google Scholar.

25 Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥassan al-Shaybānī, Sharḥ Kitāb al-Siyar al-Kabīr, commentary by Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad al-Sarakhsī, ed. Abī Abdullah Muḥammad Ḥassan Muḥammad Hassan Ismāʻil al-Shafiʻī, Vol. 4, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyyah, Beirut, 1997, p. 277Google Scholar.

26 See Muḥammad ibn Idrīs al-Shāfiʻī, Al-Umm, 2nd ed., Vol. 4, Dār al-Maʻrifah, Beirut, 1973, pp. 243, 257Google Scholar; S. Hashmi, above note 24, p. 328; A. al-Qarāfī, above note 22, pp. 208 ff.; M. al-Shaybānī, above note 25, Vol. 4, p. 154; A. Al-Dawoody, above note 7, pp. 122–126.

27 M. al-Nawawī, above note 23, p. 59; I. al-Shirāzī, above note 23, p. 278; al-Armanāzī, Najīb, Al-Sharʻ al-Dawlī fī al-Islām, 2nd ed., Riad El-Rayyes Books, London, 1990 (first published 1930), p. 124Google Scholar.

28 ʻAlī ibn Muḥammad ibn Ḥabīb al-Māwardī, Kitāb al-Aḥkām al-Sulṭāniyyah wa al-Wilāyāt al-Dīniyyah, ed. Aḥmad Mubārak al-Baghdādī, Maktabah Dār ibn Qutaybah, Kuwait, 1989, p. 57Google Scholar; I. al-Shirāzī, above note 23, p. 278.

29 Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad al-Anṣārī al-Qurṭubī, Al-Jāmiʻ li-Aḥkām al-Qur’ān, Vol. 16, Dār al-Shaʻb, Cairo, pp. 287 ffGoogle Scholar.

30 Qur'an 48:25. See N. al-Armanāzī, above note 27, p. 124; A. Al-Dawoody, above note 7, pp. 116–118.

31 See, for example, Hadith 1745 in Muslim al-Qushayrī, ibn al-Ḥajjāj, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, ed. Fū’ād ʻAbd al-Bāqī, Muḥammad, Vol. 3, Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī, Beirut, pp. 1364 ffGoogle Scholar.

32 Muḥammad ibn ʻAlī ibn Muḥammad al-Shawkānī, Nayl al-Awṭār: Min Aḥādīth Sayyid al-Khyār Sharḥ Muntaqā al-Akhbār, Vol. 8, Dār al-Jīl, Beirut, 1973, p. 71Google Scholar; A. Al-Dawoody, above note 7, pp. 118–119.

33 Qur'an 2:205; M. al-Shaybānī, above note 25, Vol. 1, pp. 32–33.

34 Muwaffaq al-Dīn ʻAbd Allah ibn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad ibn Qudāmah, Al-Mughnī, eds. ʻAbd Allah ibn ʻAbd al-Muḥsin al-Turkī and ʻAbd al-Fattaḥ Muḥammad al-Ḥilu, 3rd ed., Vol. 9, Dār ʻĀlam al-Kutub, Riyadh, 1997, pp. 233 ffGoogle Scholar.; al-Ghazālī, Muḥammad, Al-Waṣīt fī al-Madhhab, ed. Aḥmad Maḥmūd Ibrāhīm and Muḥammad Muḥammad Tāmir, Vol. 7, Dār al-Salām, Cairo, 1997, p. 31Google Scholar; M. al-Shawkānī, above note 32, p. 74; I. al-Shirāzī, above note 23, p. 279; ʻA. al-Māwardī, above note 28, p. 71; Muḥammad ibn Abī Bakr ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah, Jāmiʻ al-Fiqh, ed. Yusrī al-Sayyid Muḥammad, Vol. 4, Dār al-Wafā’, Al-Manṣūrah, 2000, p. 97Google Scholar; M. al-Nawawī, above note 23, pp. 60 ff.

35 M. al-Shāfiʻī, above note 26, pp. 257, 259, 287; ʻAlī ibn Aḥmad ibn Saʻīd ibn Ḥazm, Al-Muḥallā, Vol. 7, Dār al-Āfāq al-Jadīdah, Beirut, p. 294Google Scholar.

36 On protection of property in general, see A. Al-Dawoody, above note 7, pp. 126–129.

37 AP I, Art. 51(4). See also Geneva Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field of 12 August 1949, 75 UNTS 31 (entered into force 21 October 1950) (GC I), Art. 50; Geneva Convention (II) for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea of 12 August 1949, 75 UNTS 85 (entered into force 21 October 1950) (GC II), Art. 51.

38 AP I, Art. 52(2).

39 Anas, Mālik ibn, Al-Muwaṭṭa’, ed. Muḥammad Fū’ād ʻAbd al-Bāqī, Vol. 2, Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī, Beirut, 1985, p. 448Google Scholar.

40 M. al-Nawawī, above note 23, p. 109; M. al-Shawkānī, above note 32, p. 131.

41 Muḥammad bin Ismaʻil al-Bukhārī, Saḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, Bayt al-Afkār al-Dawliyyah lil-Nashr, Riyadh, 1998, p. 579Google Scholar.

42 AP I, Art. 37.

43 Qur'an 17:70.

44 See Hadith 2458 in Muḥammad ibn Fattūḥ al-Ḥumaydī, Al-Jamʻ bayn al-Ṣaḥīḥayn al-Bukhārī wa Muslim, ed. ʻAlī Ḥusayn al-Bawwāb, 2nd ed., Vol. 3, Dār ibn Ḥazm, Beirut, 2002, pp. 210 ffGoogle Scholar.; Mahmassani, Sobhi, “The Principles of International Law in the Light of Islamic Doctrine”, Recueil des Cours, Vol. 117, 1966, p. 303Google Scholar; A. Al-Dawoody, above note 7, p. 120.

45 M. al-Sarakhsī, above note 6, Vol. 9, pp. 135, 196; Vol. 10, pp. 129, 131; Vol. 16, p. 145; Vol. 26, p. 145.

46 W. al-Zuḥaylī, above note 19, p. 495.

47 ʻAlī ibn ʻUmar al-Dāraqutnī, Sunan al-Dāraqutnī, eds Shaʻīb al-Arnuʻūd, Ḥassan ʻAbd al-Munaʻm Shalabī and Saʻid al-Laḥām, Vol. 5, Mu'assasah al-Risālah, Beirut, 2004, p. 204Google Scholar.

48 Aḥmad ibn ʻAlī ibn Hajar al-ʻAsqalānī, Fatḥ al-Bārī Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, ed. al-Dīn, Muḥyī al-Khatīb, Vol. 6, Dār al-Maʻrifah, Beirut, p. 283Google Scholar.

49 W. al-Zuḥaylī, above note 19, p. 495.

50 ʻA. Ibn Ḥazm, above note 35, Vol. 5, p. 117.

51 M. al-Shaybānī, above note 25, Vol. 1, p. 79.

52 Ibid., Vol. 1, p. 79.

53 Muḥammad ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī, Tārīkh al-Ṭabarī: Tārīkh al-Umam wa al-Mulūk, Vol. 2, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyyah, Beirut, 2001, p. 39Google Scholar.

54 Qur'an 47:4.

55 Qur'an 9:5.

56 al-Qaraḍāwī, Yūsuf, Fiqh al-Jihād: Dirāsah Muqāranah li-Aḥkāmih wa Falsafatih fī Ḍaw’ al-Qur’ān wa al-Sunnah, Vol. 2, Maktabah Wahbah, Cairo, 2009, pp. 854 ffGoogle Scholar.; Ḥammīdullāh, Muḥammad, Muslim Conduct of State: Being a Treatise on Siyar, That is Islamic Notion of Public International Law, Consisting of the Laws of Peace, War and Neutrality, Together with Precedents from Orthodox Practice and Preceded by a Historical and General Introduction, rev. and enl. 5th ed., Sh. Muhammad Ashraf, Lahore, 1968, p. 214Google Scholar; Salaymeh, Lena, “Early Islamic Legal-Historical Precedents: Prisoners of War”, Law and History Review, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2008, p. 528CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57 See ʻAbd Allah ibn Maḥmūd ibn Mawdūd, Al-Ikhtiyār li-Taʻlīl al-Mukhtār, ed. ʻAbd al-Laṭīf Muḥammad ʻAbd al-Raḥman, 3rd ed., Vol. 4, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyyah, Beirut, 2005, p. 133Google Scholar; S. Mahmassani, above note 44, p. 307.

58 See A. al-Qarāfī, above note 22, p. 414; A. Al-Dawoody, above note 7, pp. 136–138.

59 See Muḥammad ibn ʻUmar al-Wāqidī, Kitāb al-Maghāzī, ed. Muḥammad ʻAbd al-Qādir ʻAṭā, Vol. 1, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyyah, Beirut, 2004, pp. 135, 263Google Scholar.

60 M. al-Nawawī, above note 23, p. 83.

61 Y. al-Qaraḍāwī, above note 56, pp. 858-860; L. Salaymeh, above note 56, pp. 524 ff.; Haykal, Muḥammad Ḥusayn, The Life of Muḥammad, trans. from the 8th ed. by Ismaʻīl Rāgī A. al-Fārūqī, North American Trust Publication, 1976, pp. 233, 239Google Scholar; Thomas, Troy S., “Jihad's Captives: Prisoners of War in Islam”, U.S. Air Force Academy Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 12, 2002–03, pp. 94 ff.Google Scholar; Thomas, Troy S., “Prisoners of War in Islam: A Legal Inquiry”, The Muslim World, Vol. 87, No. 1, 1997, p. 49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 M. al-Ṭabarī, above note 53, p. 39; M. Ḥammīdullāh, above note 56, p. 214; al-Wafā, Aḥmad Abū, Al-Naẓariyyah al-ʻĀmmah lil-Qānūn al-Dawlī al-Insānī fī al-Qānūn al-Dawlī wa fī al-Sharīʻah al-Islāmiyyah, Dār al-Nahḍah al-ʻArabiyyah, Cairo, 2006, p. 179Google Scholar.

63 See the references cited in note 62 above.

64 Guillaume, A. (trans.), The Life of Muhammad: A Translation of Isḥāq's Sīrat Rasūl Allāh, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1955, p. 309Google Scholar. See also ʻAbd al-Mālik ibn Hishām ibn Ayyūb al-Ḥimyarī, Al-Sīrah al-Nabawīyyah, ed. ʻUmar ʻAbd al-Salām Tadmurī, Vol. 2, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻArabī, Beirut, 1990, p.287Google Scholar.

65 Qur'an 76:8.

66 Mubārikī, Dalīlah, “Ḍawābiṭ al-ʻAlāqāt al-Dawliyyah fī al-Islām Zaman al-Ḥarb”, Majallat Kulliyyat al-ʻUlūm, 4th year, 9th ed., 2004, p. 206Google Scholar.

67 Muḥammad ibn Ismāʻīl al-Bukhārī, Mukhtaṣar Ṣaḥīḥ al-Imām al-Bukhārī, ed. Nāsr al-Albānī, Muḥammad, Vol. 2, Maktabah al-Maʻarif, Riyadh, 2002, p. 318Google Scholar.

68 See Maḥmūd, ʻAbd al-Ghanī, Ḥimāyat Ḍaḥāyā al-Nizāʻāt al-Musallaḥah fī al-Qānūn al-Dawlī al-Insānī wa al-Sharīʻah al-Islāmiyyah, ICRC, Cairo, 2000, p. 39Google Scholar; Zayd ibn ʻAbd al-Karīm al-Zayd, Muqaddimah fī al-Qānūn al-Dawlī al-Insānī fī al-Islām, ICRC, 2004, pp. 39, 77Google Scholar.

69 al-Zuhaylī, Wahbah, Āthār al-Ḥarb fī al-Islām: Dīrāsah Muqāranah, 3rd ed., Dār al-Fikr, Damascus, 1998, p. 415Google Scholar.

70 Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War of 12 August 1949, 75 UNTS 135 (entered into force 21 October 1950) (GC III), Art. 17.

71 See Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥassan al-Shaybānī, Al-Siyar, ed. Khadūrī, Majīd, Dār al-Fikr, Beirut, 1985, p.179Google Scholar; N. al-Armanāzī, above note 27, pp. 88, 164; ʻA. Ṣaqr, above note 22, p. 89.

72 See ʻA. Ṣaqr, above note 22, p. 88; Shūmān, ʻAbbās, Al-ʻAlāqāt al-Dawliyyah fī al-Sharīʻah al-Islāmiyyah, Silsilah al-Dirāsāt al-Fiqhīyyah, No. 1, Al-Dār al-Thaqāfiyyah lil-Nashr, Cairo, 1999, p. 106Google Scholar.

73 See Muḥammad al-Khatīb al-Shirbīnī, Mughnī al-Muḥtāj ilā Maʻrifah Maʻānī Alfāẓ al-Minhāj, Vol. 4, Dār al-Fikr, Beirut, p. 237; ʻA. Ṣaqr, above note 22, p. 83; Y. al-Qaraḍāwī, above note 56, p. 1178.

74 AP I, Art. 41(2)(b).

75 M. al-Shirbīnī, above note 73, p. 237

76 See ibid., p. 237; A. Al-Dawoody, above note 7, p. 132.

77 Muwaffaq al-Dīn ʻAbd Allah ibn Aḥmad ibn Qudāmah, Al-Kāfī fī Fiqh al-Imām Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal, ed. Fāris, Muḥammad and Musʻad ʻAbd al-Ḥamīd al-Saʻdanī, Vol. 4, Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyyah, Beirut, 2004, p. 163Google Scholar.

78 Qur'an 17:70.

79 Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise (eds), Customary International Humanitarian Law, Vol. 1: Rules, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Rule 112, available at: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul_rule112.

80 Z. al-Zayd, above note 68, pp. 49, 78; A. Abū al-Wafā, above note 62, pp. 206–209.

81 ʻAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib, Nahj al-Balāghah, ed. Ṣāliḥ, Ṣobḥī, 4th ed., Dār al-Kitāb al-Maṣrī, Cairo, and Dār al-Kitāb al-Lubnānī, Beirut, 2004, p. 427Google Scholar.