Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:44:53.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Competitive Ability of Black Henbane (Hyoscyamus niger) When Grown with Three Native Grasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jordana J. LaFantasie*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Fort Hays State University, 600 Park Street, Hays, KS 67601-4009
Stephen F. Enloe
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University, 119 Extension Hall, Auburn, AL 36849
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: jjlafantasie@fhsu.edu

Abstract

Black henbane is a poisonous, invasive plant in the family Solanaceae, and is typically associated with highly disturbed environments, such as pipelines, roadsides, and mammalian burrows. Often, such disturbances require reseeding for successful restoration; thus, the potential exists for competition between henbane and perennial grasses commonly used in restoration projects. These competitive interactions have not, to our knowledge, been evaluated. We conducted a greenhouse study to compare the response of henbane when grown alone and in combination with three common, cool season, perennial, northern mixed prairie grass species. We examined both seedling and mature grass response to the presence or absence of henbane and the response of henbane to the grasses. Using the relative neighbor-effect index, black henbane was found to be a very poor competitor with mature grasses and two out of three seedling grasses tested. All measures of henbane growth were significantly lower among plants grown with a mature grass pot companion. Total biomass of henbane was up to 99% lower when grown with mature grasses. Mature grasses were not negatively affected when grown in combination with henbane. Western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii) was the only seedling grass that was competitive with henbane but was also the only seedling grass negatively affected by henbane in both biomass and tiller production. These experiments suggest that henbane is not well suited for invasion of mature grass stands but may negatively influence some perennial grass seedlings in restoration situations.

Type
Notes and Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Barnes, O. K., Lang, R. L., and Beetle, A. A. 1950. Dryland Grass Seeding in Wyoming. University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 299.Google Scholar
Bhattacharjee, J., Taylor, J. P. Jr, Smith, L. M., and Haukos, D. A. 2009. Seedling competition between native cottonwood and exotic saltcedar: implications for restoration. Biol. Invasions 11:17771787.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, D. M. 2006. Interactions between resource availability and enemy release in plant invasion. Ecol. Lett 9:887895.Google Scholar
Breiter, N. C. and Seastedt, T. R. 2007. Postrelease evaluation of Mecinus janthinus host specificity, a biological control agent for invasive toadflax (Linaria spp.). Weed Sci 55:164168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M. 2000. Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci 48:255265.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M., Kyser, G. B., Orloff, S. B., and Enloe, S. F. 2000. Integrated strategies offer site-specific control of yellow starthistle. Calif. Agric 54:3036.Google Scholar
Ewing, K. 2002. Effects of initial site treatments on early growth and three-year survival of Idaho fescue. Restor. Ecol 10:282288.Google Scholar
Ferrell, M. A., Whitson, T. C., Koch, D. W., and Gade, A. E. 1998. Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) control with several grass species. Weed Technol 12:374380.Google Scholar
Gibson, D. J., Connolly, J., Hartnett, D. C., and Weidenhamer, J. D. 1999. Designs for greenhouse studies of interactions between plants. J. Ecol 87:116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilham, J. H., Hild, A. L., Johnson, J. H., Hunt, E. R. Jr, and Whitson, T. D. 2004. Weed invasion susceptibility prediction (WISP) model for use with geographic information systems. Arid Land Res. Manag 18:112.Google Scholar
Goodwin, J. R., Doescher, P. S., Eddleman, L. E., and Zobel, D. B. 1999. Persistence of Idaho fescue on degraded sagebrush-steppe. J. Range Manage 52:187198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafson, D. J., Gibson, D. J., and Nickrent, D. L. 2002. Genetic diversity and competitive abilities of Dalea purpurea (Fabaceae) from remnant and restored grasslands. Int. J. Plant Sci 163:979990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. 1991. Disturbance a precursor to weed invasion in native vegetation. Plant Prot. Q 6:99104.Google Scholar
Hocking, G. M. 1947. Henbane-healing herb of Hercules and of Apollo. Econ. Bot 1:306316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markham, J. H. and Chanway, C. P. 1996. Measuring plant neighbor effects. Funct. Ecol 10:548549.Google Scholar
Masters, R. A. and Sheley, R. L. 2001. Principles and practices for managing rangeland invasive plants. J. Range Manage 54:502517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitich, L. W. 1992. Intriguing world of weeds: henbane. Weed Technol 6:489491.Google Scholar
Oksanen, L., Sammul, M., and Mägi, M. 2006. On the indices of plant–plant competition and their pitfalls. Oikos 112:149155.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S. R., Holt, J. S., and Ghersa, C. M. 2007. Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ J. Wiley. 454 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seastedt, T. R. and Suding, K. N. 2007. Biotic constraints on the invasion of diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa) in North American grasslands. Oecologia 151:626636.Google Scholar
Selleck, G. W. 1964. Ecology of black henbane in Saskatchewan. Weeds 12:148150.Google Scholar
Sher, A. A., Marshall, D. L., and Gilbert, S. A. 2000. Competition between native Populus deltoides and invasive Tamarix ramosissima and the implications for reestablishing flooding disturbance. Conserv. Biol 14:17441754.Google Scholar
Siemens, T. J. and Blossey, B. 2007. An evaluation of mechanisms preventing growth and survival of two native species in invasive bohemian knotweed (Fallopia × bohemica, Polygonaceae). Am. J. Bot 94:776783.Google Scholar
Stewart, G. W. 1934. A Phyto-Chemical Examination of Montana Hyoscyamus niger. M.S. thesis. Bozeman, MT Montana State University. 34 p.Google Scholar
Thacker, E., Ralphs, M. H., and Monaco, T. A. 2009a. A comparison of inter- and intraspecific interference on broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae) seedling growth. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag 2:3644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thacker, E., Ralphs, M. H., and Monaco, T. A. 2009b. Seeding cool-season grasses to suppress broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae), downy brome (Bromus tectorum), and weedy forbs. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag 2:237246.Google Scholar
Tyser, R. W. and Key, C. H. 1988. Spotted knapweed in natural area fescue grasslands: an ecological assessment. Northwest Sci 62:151160.Google Scholar
[USDA–ARS] U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5, 2004. http://plants.usda.gov Accessed: December 19, 2004.Google Scholar
Whitson, T. D., Burrill, L. C., Dewey, S. A., et al. 2004. Weeds of the West. 9th ed. Newark, CA Western Society of Weed Science.Google Scholar
Williams, L. O. 1960. Drug and Condiment Plants. Washington, DC United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Handbook 172.Google Scholar