Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T02:49:42.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Invasive Reed Canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) and Native Vegetation Channel Roughness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Adriana E. Martinez*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97401
Patricia F. McDowell
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97401
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: adrmart@siue.edu

Abstract

In instances where vegetation plays a dominant role in the riparian landscape, the type and characteristics of species, particularly a dominant invasive, can alter water velocity at high flows when vegetation is inundated. However, quantifying this resistance in terms of riparian vegetation has largely been ignored or listed as a secondary characteristic on roughness reference tables. We calculated vegetation roughness based on measurements of plant stem stiffness, plant frontal area, stem density, and stem area of three dominant herbaceous plants along the Sprague River, Oregon: the invasive reed canarygrass, native creeping spikerush, and native inflated sedge. Results show slightly lower roughness values than those predicted for vegetation using reference tables. In addition, native creeping spikerush and invasive reed canarygrass exhibit higher roughness values than native inflated sedge, which exhibits values lower than the other two species. These findings are of particular importance where the invasive reed canarygrass is outcompeting native inflated sedge, because with invasive colonization, roughness is increasing in channel zones and therefore is likely changing channel processes. Direct depositional measurements show similar results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aldridge, BN, Garrett, JM (1973) Roughness Coefficients for Stream Channels in Arizona. Tucson, AZ U.S. Geologic Survey. 87 pGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DE (1961) Taxonomy and distribution of the genus Phalaris . Iowa State J Sci 36:196 Google Scholar
Antieau, CJ (2004) Biology and Management of Reed Canarygrass, and Implications for Ecological Restoration. Seattle, WA Department of Transportation Google Scholar
Apfelbaum, SI, Sams, CE (1987) Ecology and control of reed canarygrass. Nat Areas J 2:6974 Google Scholar
Arcement, GJ, Schneider, VR (1989) Guide for Selecting Manning's Roughness Coefficients for Natural Channels and Floodplains. U.S. Geological Survey Water-supply Paper 2339. Denver, CO U.S. Geological Survey. 44 pGoogle Scholar
Asaeda, T, Rajapakse, L, Kanoh, M (2010) Fine sediment retention as affected by annual shoot collapse: Sparganium erectum as an ecosystem engineer in a lowland stream. River Res Appl 26:11531169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, HH (1967) Roughness Characteristics of Natural Channels. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1849. Washington, DC U.S. Geological Survey. 211 pGoogle Scholar
Boyd, M, Kasper, B (2002) Upper Klamath Lake Drainage Stream Temperature Analysis: Attachment 1 Upper Klamath Lake Drainage TMDL. Portland, OR Department of Environmental Quality. 268 pGoogle Scholar
Chow, VT (1959) Open Channel Hydraulics. New York McGraw-Hill. 384 pGoogle Scholar
Clarke, A, Lake, PS, O’Dowd, DJ (2004) Ecological impacts on aquatic macroinvertebrates following upland stream invasion by a ponded pasture grass (Glyceria maxima) in southern Australia. Mar Freshw Res 55:709713 Google Scholar
Coon, WF (1998) Estimation of Roughness Coefficients for Natural Stream Channels with Vegetated Banks. USGS Water-Supply Paper 2441. Washington, DC U.S. Geological Survey. 133 pGoogle Scholar
Copeland, RR (2000) Determination of Flow Resistance Coefficients Due to Shrubs and Woody Vegetation. ERDC/CHL CHETN-VIII-3. Washington, DC U.S. Geological Survey. 9 pGoogle Scholar
Corenblit, D, Gurnell, AM, Steiger, J, Tabacchi, E (2008) Reciprocal adjustments between landforms and living organisms: extended geomorphic evolutionary insights. Catena 73:261273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, WL (1956) Estimating hydraulic roughness coefficients. Agric Eng 37:473475 Google Scholar
Cowell, CM, Dyer, JM (2002) Vegetation development in a modified riparian environment: human imprints on an Allegheny River wilderness. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 92:189202 Google Scholar
Fei, S, Phillips, JD, Shouse, M (2014) Biogeomorphic impacts of invasive species. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 45:6987 Google Scholar
Foster, RD, Wetzel, PR (2005) Invading monotypic stands of Phalaris arundinacea: a test of fire, herbicide, and woody and herbaceous native plant groups. Restor Ecol 13:318324 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, GE, Rahmeyer, WH, Copeland, RR (2000) Determination of resistance due to shrubs and woody vegetation. No. ERDC/CHL-TR-00-25. Vicksburg, MS U.S. Geological Survey. 63 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrichsen, PT (1997) Summertime Stream Temperatures in the North and South Forks of the Sprague River, South Central Oregon. Master's thesis. Corvallis, OR Oregon State University. P 147 Google Scholar
Galatowitsch, SM, Anderson, NO, Ascher, PD (1999) Invasiveness in wetland plants in temperate North America. Wetlands 19:733755 Google Scholar
Gilley, JE, Finkner, SC (1991) Hydraulic roughness coefficients as affected by random roughness. Trans ASAE (Am Soc Agric Eng) 34:897903 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, ML, Elmer, DA, Pien, NC, Fisher, JS (1979) Effects of stem density upon sediment retention by salt marsh cord grass, Spartina alterniflora Loisel. Estuaries 2:271273 Google Scholar
Gordon, DR (1998) Effects of invasive, non-indigenous plant species on ecosystem processes: lessons from Florida. Ecol Appl 8:975989 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, ND, McMahon, TA, Finlayson, BL, Gipel, CJ, Nathan, RJ (2004) Stream Hydrology: An Introduction for Ecologists. West Sussex, UK Wiley. 448 pGoogle Scholar
Graf, WL (1978) Fluvial adjustments to the spread of tamarisk in the Colorado Plateau region. Geol Soc Am Bull 89:14911501 Google Scholar
Gran, K, Paola, C (2001) Riparian vegetation controls on braided stream dynamics. Water Resour Res 37:32753283 Google Scholar
Griffith, B, Youtie, BA (1988) Two devices for estimating foliage density and deer hiding cover. Wildl Soc Bull 16:206210 Google Scholar
Guard, BJ (1995) Wetland Plants of Oregon and Washington. Auburn, WA Lone Pine. 240 pGoogle Scholar
Gurnell, AM (1997) The hydrological and geomorphological significance of forested floodplains. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett 6:219229 Google Scholar
Gurnell, AM, Boitsidis, AJ, Thompson, K, Clifford, NJ (2006a) Seed bank, seed dispersal and vegetation cover: colonization along a newly-created river channel. J Veg Sci 17:665674 Google Scholar
Gurnell, A, Morrissey, I, Boitsidis, A, Bark, T, Clifford, N, Petts, G, Thompson, K (2006b) Initial adjustments within a new river channel: interactions between fluvial processes, colonizing vegetation, and bank profile development. Environ Manag 38:580596 Google Scholar
Gurnell, AM, O’Hare, JM, Dunbar, MJ, Scarlett, PM (2010) An exploration of associations between assemblages of aquatic plant morphotypes and channel geomorphological properties within British rivers. Geomorphology 116:135144 Google Scholar
Gurnell, AM, Petts, G (2006) Trees as riparian engineers: the Tagliamento River, Italy. Earth Surface Process Landforms 31:15581574 Google Scholar
Hey, RD, Thorne, CR (1986) Stable channels with mobile gravel beds. J Hydraulic Eng 112:671689 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, DM, Mason, PD (1998) Roughness Characteristics of New Zealand Rivers. Highlands Ranch, CO Water Resources Publications. 336 pGoogle Scholar
Kondolf, GM, Lisle, TE, Wolman, GM (2003) Bed sediment measurement. Pages 347395 in Kondolf, GM, Piegay, H, eds. Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology. Chichester, UK J. Wiley Google Scholar
Kouwen, N (1988) Field estimation of biomechanical properties of grass. J Hydraulic Res 26:559568 Google Scholar
Lavoie, C, Dufresne, C, Delisle, F (2005) The spread of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) in Quebec: a spatio-temporal perspective. Ecoscience 12:366375 Google Scholar
Leonard, LA, Luther, ME (1995) Flow hydrodynamics in tidal marsh canopies. Limnol Oceanogr 40:14741484 Google Scholar
Marten, GC, Heath, ME (1973) Reed canarygrass. Pages 211220 in Heath, ME, Metcalfe, DS, Barnes, RF, eds. Forages: The Science of Grassland Agriculture. Ames, IA The Iowa State University Press Google Scholar
McKenney, R, Jacobson, RB, Wertheimer, RC (1995) Woody vegetation and channel morphogenesis in low gradient, gravel-bed streams in the Ozark Plateaus, Missouri and Arkansas. Geomorphology 13:175198 Google Scholar
Millar, RG (2000) Influence of bank vegetation on alluvial channel patterns. Water Resour Res 36:11091118 Google Scholar
Millar, RG (2005) Theoretical regime equations for mobile gravel-bed rivers with stable banks. Geomorphology 64:207220 Google Scholar
Millar, RG, Quick, MC (1998) Stable width and depth of gravel-bed rivers with cohesive banks. J Hydraulic Eng 124:10051013 Google Scholar
Moore, JW (2006) Animal ecosystem engineers in streams. BioScience 56:237246 Google Scholar
Murray, AB, Knaapen, MAF, Tal, M, Kirwan, ML (2008. Biomorphodynamics: physical-biological feedbacks that shape landscapes. Water Resour Res 44:118 Google Scholar
Naglich, FG (1994) Reed Canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in the Pacific Northwest: Growth Parameters, Economic Uses, and Control. Master's thesis. Olympia, WA The Evergreen State College. 30 pGoogle Scholar
Nevins, THF (1969) River training—the single thread channel. N Z Eng 24:367373 Google Scholar
Nudds, TD (1977) Quantifying the vegetative structure of wildlife cover. Wildl Soc Bull 5:113117 Google Scholar
[OWRD] Oregon Water Resources Department (2013) OWRD Near Real Time Hydrographic Data, 11497500, SPRAGUE R NR BEATTY, OR. http://apps.wrd.state.or.us/apps/sw/hydro_near_real_time/display_hydro_graph.aspx?station_nbr=11497500. Accessed September 30, 2015Google Scholar
Perucca, E, Camporeale, C, Ridolfi, L (2007) Significance of the riparian vegetation dynamics on meandering river morphodynamics. Water Resour Res 43:110 Google Scholar
Phillips, JV, Ingersoll, TL (1998) Verification of Roughness Coefficients for Selected Natural and Constructed Stream Channels in Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1584. Reston, VA U.S. Geological Survey. 90 pGoogle Scholar
Pojar, J, MacKinnon, A (1994) Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Vancouver, BC Lone Pine. 528 pGoogle Scholar
Rahmeyer, WH, Werth, D, Freeman, GE (1999) Improved methods of determining vegetative resistance in floodplains and compound channels. Page 10 in Proceedings of the 1999 International Water Resources Engineering Conference. Seattle, WA American Society of Civil Engineers Google Scholar
Reinhardt, L, Jerolmack, D, Cardinale, BJ, Vanacker, V, Wright, JP (2010) Dynamic interaction of life and its landscape: feedbacks at the interface of geomorphology and ecology. Earth Surface Process Landforms 35:78101 Google Scholar
Roberson, JA, Crowe, JT (1993) Engineering Fluid Mechanics. New York, NY Wiley. 768 pGoogle Scholar
Sage, RB, Hallins, K, Gregory, CL, Woodburn, MIA, Carroll, JP (2004) Impact of roe deer Capreolus capreolus browsing on understorey vegetation in small farm woodlands. Wildl Biol 10:115120 Google Scholar
Sand-Jensen, K, Mebus, JR (1996) Fine-scale patterns of water velocity within macrophyte patches in streams. Oikos 76:169180 Google Scholar
Schulz, M, Kozerski, H-P, Pluntke, T, Rinke, K (2003) The influence of macrophytes on sedimentation and nutrient retention in the lower River Spree (Germany). Water Res 37:569578 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sher, AA, Marshall, DL, Gilbert, SA (2000) Competition between native Populus deltoides and invasive Tamarix ramosissima and the implications for reestablishing flooding disturbance. Conserv Biol 14:17441754 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, A, Castro, J (2003) Measurement and analysis of alluvial channel form. Pages 291322 in Kondolf, GM, Piegay, H, eds. Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology. West Sussex, UK J. Wiley Google Scholar
Smith, MW (2014) Roughness in the earth sciences. Earth-Sci Rev 136:202225 Google Scholar
Tal, M, Paola, C (2007) Dynamic single-thread channels maintained by the interaction of flow and vegetation. Geology 35:347350 Google Scholar
Tal, M, Paola, C (2010) Effects of vegetation on channel morphodynamics: results and insights from laboratory experiments. Earth Surface Process Landforms 35:10141028 Google Scholar
Temmerman, S, Bouma, TJ, Van de Koppel, J, Herman, PMJ, De Vries, MB (2006) Plant growth initiates channel erosion in flat landscapes: evidence from tidal marshes. Geophys Res Abst 8:08871[Abstract]Google Scholar
Tickner, DP, Angold, PG, Gurnell, AM, Mountford, JO (2001) Riparian plant invasions: hydrogeomorphological control and ecological impacts. Progr Phys Geogr 21:2252 Google Scholar
Tourbier, JT, Westmacott, R (1981) Water resources protection technology. Washington DC Urban Land Institute. 178 pGoogle Scholar
Van Hulzen, JB, Van Soelen, J, Bouma, TJ (2007) Morphological variation and habitat modification are strongly correlated for the autogenic ecosystem engineer Spartina anglica (common cordgrass). Estuar Coast 30:311 Google Scholar
Viles, HA (1988) Biogeomorphology. Oxford, UK Basil Blackwell. 352 pGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q, S.Q A, Ma, ZJ, Zhao, B, Chen, JK, Li, B (2006) Invasive Spartina alterniflora: biology, ecology and management. Acta Phytotaxon Sin 44:559588 Google Scholar
Wilson, BL, Brinerd, RE, Lytjen, D, Newhouse, B, Otting, N (2008a) Field Guide to Sedges of the Pacific Northwest. Corvallis Oregon State University Press. 432 pGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C, Hoyt, J, Schnauder, I (2008b) Impact of foliage on the drag force of vegetation in aquatic flows. J Hydraulic Eng 134:885891 Google Scholar