Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T19:24:28.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effectiveness of Control Treatments on Young Saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) Plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Michelle K. Ohrtman*
Affiliation:
South Dakota State University, Department of Plant Science, Brookings, SD 57007
Sharon A. Clay
Affiliation:
South Dakota State University, Department of Plant Science, Brookings, SD 57007
Shauna Waughtel
Affiliation:
South Dakota State University, Department of Plant Science, Brookings, SD 57007
Janet Moriles
Affiliation:
South Dakota State University, Department of Plant Science, Brookings, SD 57007
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: michelle.ohrtman@sdstate.edu

Abstract

Preventing the establishment of saltcedar in new areas requires early detection and rapid response. However, it is unclear when saltcedar develops perennating tissue and which treatments are most efficacious for young plants. The effectiveness of mowing, herbicide, and fire treatments, alone and in combination, was evaluated on saltcedar plants grown from seed to 4, 8, and 12 wk age in 2011 and 6 and 12 wk age in 2012. Plants were clipped to 2 cm height or remained intact. Plants were then exposed to no treatment (control), herbicide application (0.12 mg ae imazapyr), or treated with fire for 30 or 60 s. Six weeks after treatment, plant survival and tallest living shoot height were recorded and roots were dried and weighed for biomass comparison. Saltcedar survival increased with greater plant age. No 4-wk-old plants survived herbicide or fire treatments, whereas 6-wk-old plants were eliminated by fire. Clipping alone did not control plants of any age but clipping before fire was the most effective control for older plants. Herbicide alone did not kill 8- and 12-wk-old plants during the study period, but reduced plant vigor suggests that these applications may be effective in the long-term. Fire alone for 60 s was the most effective single treatment for 12-wk-old plants. Root biomass was reduced for all treatments relative to untreated plants with the lowest biomass typically associated with fire treatments. Resprouts were shortest for combined clipping and herbicide and clipping and fire treatments. Results indicate that saltcedar grown from seed can develop viable belowground reproductive tissues between 6 and 8 wk after germination. Multiple intensive control practices may be required to kill saltcedar plants ≥8 wk of age, whereas younger plants can be controlled by single, less-intensive treatments such as fire.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Busch, DE, Smith, SD (1993) Effects of fire on water and salinity relations of riparian woody taxa. Oecologia 94:186194 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, LM (2001) Short-term response of woody plants to fire in a Rio Grande riparian forest, Central New Mexico, USA. Biol Cons 97:159170 Google Scholar
Estrella, S, Kneitel, JM (2011) Invasion age and invader removal alter species cover and composition at the Suisun Tidal Marsh, California, USA. Diversity 3:235251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friederici, P (1995) The alien saltcedar. Am For 101:4547 Google Scholar
Gladwin, DN, Roelle, JE (1998) Survival of plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides subsp. monilifera) and saltcedar (Tamarix ramosissima) seedlings in response to flooding. Wetlands 18:669674 Google Scholar
Horton, JS, Mounts, FC, Kraft, JM (1960) Seed germination and seedling establishment of phreatophyte species. United States Department of Agriculture, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ft. Collins, CO, USA. Paper No. 48Google Scholar
Jarnevich, CS, Evangelista, P, Stohlgren, TJ, Morisette, J (2011) Improving national-scale invasion maps: tamarisk in the western United States. West N Am Nat 71:164175 Google Scholar
Kerns, BK, Naylor, BJ, Buonopane, M, Parks, CG, Rogers, B (2009) Modeling tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) habitat and climate change effects in the northwestern United States. Invasive Plant Sci Manage 2:200215 Google Scholar
McDaniel, KC, Taylor, JP (2003) Saltcedar recovery after herbicide-burn and mechanical clearing practices. J Range Manage 56:439445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkel, DL, Hopkins, HH (1957) Life history of salt cedar (Tamarix gallica). Trans Kansas Acad Sci 60:360369 Google Scholar
Morisette, JT, Jarnevich, CS, Ullah, A, Cai, W, Pedelty, JA, Gentle, JE, Stohlgren, TJ, Schnase, JL (2006) A tamarisk habitat suitability map for the continental United States. Front Ecol Environ 4:1117 Google Scholar
Ohrtman, MK, Clay, SA (2013) Using a pervasive invader for Weed Science education. Weed Technol. 27:395400 Google Scholar
Ohrtman, MK, Clay, SA, Clay, DE, Mousel, EM, Smart, AJ (2011) Preventing saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) seedling establishment in the Northern Prairie Pothole Region. Invasive Plant Sci Manage 4:427436 Google Scholar
Ohrtman, MK, Clay, SA, Clay, DE, Smart, AJ (2012) Fire as a tool for controlling saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) seedlings. Invasive Plant Sci Manage 5:139147 Google Scholar
Sexton, JP, McKay, JK, Sala, A (2002) Plasticity and genetic diversity may allow saltcedar to invade cold climates in North America. Ecol Appl 12:16521660 Google Scholar
Smith, M, Sprenger, MD, Taylor, JP (2002) Effects of discing saltcedar seedlings during riparian restoration. Southwest Nat 47:598601 Google Scholar
Sprenger, MD, Smith, LM, Taylor, JP (2001) Testing control of saltcedar seedlings using fall flooding. Wetlands 21:437441 Google Scholar
Tomanek, GW, Ziegler, RL (1962) Ecological Studies of Saltcedar. Hayes, KS Fort Hays Kansas State College. 128 pGoogle Scholar
Warren, DK, Turner, RM (1975) Saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) seed production, seedling establishment, and response to inundation. J Arizona Acad Sci 10:135144 Google Scholar
Westbrooks, RG (2004) New approaches for early detection and rapid response to invasive plants in the United States. Weed Technol 18:14681471 Google Scholar
Wilkinson, RE (1966) Vegetative response of saltcedar (Tamarix pentandra Pell.) to photoperiod. Plant Phys 41:271276 Google Scholar