No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Hero of “the Noble Afshar People”: Reconsidering Nader Shah's Claims to Lineage and Legitimacy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2022
Abstract
This essay examines Nader Shah Afshar's attempts to legitimize his rule by dint of his Turkic background. Over the course of his rise to power and reign, Nader consistently argued that his Afshar and Turkman affiliations granted him the right to rule over Iranian territory as an equal to his Ottoman, Mughal, and Central Asian contemporaries. Aided by his chief secretary and court historian, Mīrzā Mahdī Astarābādī, Nader's assertions paralleled those found in popular narratives about the history of Oghuz Turks in Islamic lands. This element of Nader's political identity is often overlooked by historians because it did not outlive the brief Afsharid period, but it demonstrates how the Safavid collapse led to the circulation of dynamic new claims to Iranian and Islamic political power.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Association for Iranian Studies
References
Abraham of Crete. The Chronicle of Abraham of Crete. Translated by Bournoutian, George A.. Armenian Studies Series No. 1. Costa Mesa: Mazda, 1999.Google Scholar
Arjomand, Said Amir. The Shadow of God and the Hidden Imam: Religion, Political Order, and Societal Change in Shiʿite Iran from the Beginning to 1890. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. Azerbaycan Folklor Külliyatı. Vol. 15, Dastanlar. Bakı: AMEA Folklor İnstitutu, 2010.Google Scholar
Anonymous. Azerbaycan Folklor Külliyatı. Vol. 16, Dastanlar. Bakı: AMEA Folklor İnstitutu, 2010.Google Scholar
Astarābādī, Mīrzā Mahdī Khān. Dorre-ye Nādereh. Edited by Jaʿfar Shahīdī, Seyyed. Tehran: Vezārat-e Farhang va Āmūzesh-e ʿĀlī, 1387.Google Scholar
Astarābādī, Mīrzā Mahdī Khān. Jahāngoshā-ye Nāderī. Tehran: Enteshārāt-e Anjoman-e Ās̲āri-e Mellī, 1962.Google Scholar
Astarābādī, Mīrzā Mahdī Khān, and Clauson, Gerard. Sanglax: A Persian Guide to the Turkish Language. E. J. W. Gibb Memorial Series 20. London: Luzac, 1960.Google Scholar
Ateş, Abdurrahman. Osmanlı-İran Siyasi İlişkileri (1720–1747). Ankara: Altınpost, 2001.Google Scholar
Avery, Peter. “Nādir Shāh and the Afsharid Legacy.” In The Cambridge History of Iran, vol. 7, From Nadir Shah to the Islamic Republic, edited by Avery, Peter, Hambly, Gavin, and Melville, Charles, 1–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Axworthy, Michael, ed. Crisis, Collapse, Militarism and Civil War: The History and Historiography of 18th Century Iran. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axworthy, Michel. The Sword of Persia: Nader Shah, from Tribal Warrior to Conquering Tyrant. New York: I.B. Tauris, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çıpa, H. Erdem. The Making of Selim: Succession, Legitimacy, and Memory in the Early Modern Ottoman World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demir, Necati and Aydoğdu, Özkan. Oğuzname (Kazan Nüshası). Istanbul: Kesit Yayınları, 2015.Google Scholar
DeWeese, Devin. “Islamization in the Mongol Empire.” In The Cambridge History of Inner Asia: The Chinggisid Age, edited by Cosmo, Nicola Di, Frank, Allen J., and Golden, Peter B., 120–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, Martin B. “The Fall of the Ṣafavi Dynasty.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 82, no. 4 (1962): 503–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Ebülgâzî Bahadir. Şecere-i Terākime: Türkmenlerin Soykütüğü. Edited by Ölmez, Zühal Kargı. Türk Dilleri Araştırmaları Dizisi 3. Ankara: Simurg, 1996.Google Scholar
Elliot, Henry Miers, and Dowson, John. The History of India, as Told by Its Own Historians: The Muhammadan Period. Vol. 8. Cambridge Library Collection. Perspectives from the Royal Asiatic Society. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Gökçimen, Ahmet. “Köroğlu Destanı’nın Türkmen Varyantında Kafkas Coğrafyası.” Atatürk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi 52 (2014): 215–27.Google Scholar
Hanway, Jonas. An Historical Account of the British Trade over the Caspian Sea: With the Author's Journal of Travels from England through Russia into Persia; and Back through Russia, Germany and Holland. 2nd ed. Vols. 1–2. London: Printed for T. Osborne [etc.], 1754.Google Scholar
al-Ḥusaynī, Maḥmūd ibn Ibrāhīm. Tārīkh-e Aḥmad Shāhī: Tārīkh-e Tashkīl-e Avvalīn ḥukūmat-e Afghānistān. Edited by Zargarīnizhād, Gholām Ḥusayn. Publications De L'Université De Tehran No. 2691. Tehran: Entishārāt-e Dāneshgāh-e Tehrān, 2005.Google Scholar
Karamustafa, Ali. “Who Were the Türkmen of Ottoman and Safavid Lands? An Overlooked Early Modern Identity.” Der Islam 97, no. 2 (2020): 476–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Kāshgarī, Maḥmūd. Compendium of the Turkic Dialects. Edited by Dankoff, Robert and Kelly, James. 3 vols. Sources of Oriental Languages and Literatures, Turkic Sources 7. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Printing Office, 1982.Google Scholar
Kashmīrī, Khvājeh ʿAbdolkarīm ibn Khvājeh ʿAqebat Maḥmūd. Bayān-i Vāqeʿ: Sargozasht-e Aḥvāl-e Nāder Shāh. Edited by Kay Bī Nasīm, Dākter. Lahore: Edāre-ye Taḥqīqāt-e Pākestān Dāneshgāh-e Punjāb-e Lāhūr, 1970.Google Scholar
Rağıp Paşa, Koca. Tahkik ve Tevfik: Osmanlı-İran Diplomatik Münasebetlerinde Mezhep Tartışmaları. Kitabevi (Series) 186. Istanbul: Kitabevi, 2003.Google Scholar
Lambton, Ann K. S. “The Tribal Resurgence and the Decline of the Bureaucracy in the Eighteenth Century.” In Studies in 18th-Century Islamic History, Papers on Islamic History 4, edited by Naff, Thomas and Owen, Roger, 108–29. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Lockhart, Laurence. Nadir Shah: A Critical Study Based Mainly upon Contemporary Sources. London: Luzac, 1938.Google Scholar
Marvī, Moḥammad Kāẓem. ʿĀlam-ārā-ye Nāderī. Edited by Amīn Riyāḥī, Doktor Moḥammad. Isfahan: Chāp-e Naqsh-e Jahān, 1364.Google Scholar
Mazzaoui, Michel M. The Origins of the Ṣafawids: Šīʿism, Ṣūfism, and the Ġulāt. Freiburger Islamstudien; Bd. 3. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner, 1972.Google Scholar
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “Powers of One: The Mathematicalization of the Occult Sciences in the High Persianate Tradition.” Intellectual History of the Islamicate World 5, no. 1–2 (2017): 127–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moḥammad, ʿAlī ibn Abīṭāleb (Ḥazīn). Tārīkh-e Ḥazīn. Isfahan: Ketābforūshī-ye Taʾīd Eṣfahān, 1332.Google Scholar
Moin, A. Azfar. The Millennial Sovereign: Sacred Kingship and Sainthood in Islam. Chichester: Columbia University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navāʾī, ʿAbd ol-Ḥosayn, ed. Nāder Shāh va Bāzmāndagānash: Hamrāh Bā Nāmahʾhā-ye Salṭanatī va Asnād-e Siyāsī va Edārī. Tehran: Zarrīn, 1989.Google Scholar
Roemer, H. R. “The Safavid Period.” In The Cambridge History of Iran, vol. 6, The Timurid and Safavid Periods, edited by Jackson, Peter and Lockhart, Lawrence, 189–350. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Şemʾdānī-zāde, Süleyman Efendi. Şemʾdānī-zāde Fındıklılı Süleyman Efendi Tārihi Mürʾiʾt-tevārih. Edited by Münir Aktepe, M.. İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Yayınları No. 2088, 2366, 2799. Istanbul: Edebiyat Fakültesi Matbaası, 1976.Google Scholar
Shīrāzī, Abdi Beg. Takmilat ol-Akhbār. Edited by Navāʾī, ʿAbd ol-Hossein. Tehran: Nashr-e Ney, 1989.Google Scholar
Efendi, Sırrı. Risaletüʾt-tarih-i Nadir Şah: Makale-i Vakıʿa-i Muhasara-i Kars. Istanbul: Kitabevi, 2012.Google Scholar
Mehmet Efendi, Subhī. Subhī tarihi: Sāmī ve Şākir tarihleri ile birlikte: 1730–1744 (İnceleme ve karşılaştırmalı metin). Edited by Aydıner, Mesut. Istanbul: Kitabevi, 2007.Google Scholar
al-Suwaydī, ʿAbd Allāh ibn Ḥusayn. Kitāb al-Ḥujaj al-qaṭʿiyya li-ittifāq al-firaq al-Islāmiyya. 1st ed. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat al-Saʿāda, 1905.Google Scholar
Arutin, Tanburī. Tahmas Kulu Hanʾın Tevarihi. Translated by Uras, Esat. Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınlarından II, Seri 7. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 1942.Google Scholar
Tarzi, Amin. “Tarikh-i Ahmad Shahi: The First History of ‘Afghanistan.’” In Afghan History through Afghan Eyes, edited by Green, Nile. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190247782.003.0003.Google Scholar
Tehrānī, Moḥammad Shafīʿ Tehrānī (Vāred). Tarikh-i Nādershāhī. Edited by Shaʿbānī, Reżā. Enteshārāt-e Bonyād-e Farhang-e Īrān 97. N.p.: Chāpkhāneh-ye Zar va Khāneh-ye Chāp, 1349.Google Scholar
Tucker, Ernest. “Explaining Nadir Shah: Kingship and Royal Legitimacy in Muhammad Kazim Marvi's Tarikh-i ʿAlam-ara-yi Nadiri.” Iranian Studies 26, no. 1–2 (1993): 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Ernest. Nadir Shah's Quest for Legitimacy in Post-Safavid Iran. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2006.Google Scholar
Tucker, Ernest. “Seeking a World Empire.” In History and Historiography of Post-Mongol Central Asia and the Middle East: Studies in Honor of John E. Woods, edited by Pfeiffer, Judith and Quinn, Sholeh, 332–42. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2006.Google Scholar
Türkmen, Fikret. “Kazanʾdan yeni bir oğuzname nüshası üzerine.” In Uluslararası Türk Dili Kongresi 1992: 26 Eylül 1992–1 Ekim 1992. The International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, 425–33. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür, Dil Ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu, 1996.Google Scholar
Ṭūsī, Moḥammad ʿAlī (mashhūr be-Ferdowsī-ye Sāni). Shāhnāmeh-ye Nāderī. Edited by Soheili Khvānsārī, Aḥmad. Tehran: Chāp-e Tābān, 1339.Google Scholar
Wilks, Judith. “Aspects of the Köroğlu Destan: Chodzko and Beyond.” PhD diss., University of Chicago, 1995.Google Scholar
Woods, John E. The Aqquyunlu: Clan, Confederation, Empire. Revised and expanded ed. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1999.Google Scholar