No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Occult Ecumenism: Maḥmūd Dihdār Shīrāzī's Unveiling Secrets as Exemplar of Timurid-Safavid Sunni-Shiʿi Science
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 November 2022
Abstract
That Safavid Iran was scene to a boom in the occult sciences (ʿulum-i gharība) is now beginning to be acknowledged by specialists; what has yet to be appreciated is the extent to which that boom represented a smooth and conscious continuation of Mamluk, Aqquyunlu, Ottoman and especially Timurid Sunni precedent. In particular, lettrism (ʿilm-i ḥurūf), developed by the Pythagoreanizing, imamophile New Brethren of Purity as universal imperial science, was embraced by leading Safavid thinkers and doers as a primary Sunni means of Shiʿizing Iran. This occult continuity is epitomized by the oeuvre of Maḥmūd Dihdār Shīrāzī “ʿIyānī” (fl. 1576), the most prolific Persian author on lettrism of the sixteenth century and teacher to Shaykh Bahāʾī (d. 1621) himself. His Unveiling Secrets (Kashf al-asrār)—a passionate prosimetric paean to Imam ʿAlī as cosmic principle in strictly Akbarian-Būnian terms, like Rajab al-Bursī’s (d. after 1410) work before it—is contextualized and translated here as a case in point.
Keywords
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Association for Iranian Studies
References
Abisaab, Rula Jurdi. Converting Persia: Religion and Power in the Safavid Empire. London: I.B. Tauris, 2004.Google Scholar
Acevedo, Juan. Alphanumeric Cosmology from Greek into Arabic: The Idea of Stoicheia through the Medieval Mediterranean. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amanat, Abbas. Iran: A Modern History. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017.10.2307/j.ctv19prrqmCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amir-Moezzi, Mohammad Ali. The Spirituality of Shiʿi Islam: Beliefs and Practices. London: IB Tauris, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babayan, Kathryn. “The Cosmological Order of Things in Early Modern Safavid Iran.” In Falnama: The Book of Omens, edited by Farhad, Massumeh and Bağcı, Serpil, 345–54. London: Thames & Hudson, 2009.Google Scholar
Babayan, Kathryn. Mystics, Monarchs, and Messiahs: Cultural Landscapes of Early Modern Iran. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
al-Bursī, al-Ḥāfiẓ Rajab. Mashāriq anwār al-yaqīn fī asrār amīr al-muʾminīn. Edited by ʿĀshūr, ʿAlī. Beirut: al-Aʿlamī, 1422/2001.Google Scholar
Corbin, Henry. “La gnose islamique dans le recueil de traditions (Mashāriq al-anwār) de Rajab Borsī.” In Itinéraire d'un enseignement: résumé des conférences à l’École pratique des hautes études (Section des sciences religieuses), 1955–1979, edited by Corbin, Henry, 104–14. Louvain: Diffusion, Peeters, 1993.Google Scholar
Doostdar, Alireza. The Iranian Metaphysicals: Explorations in Science, Islam and the Uncanny. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Erginbaş, Vefa. “Problematizing Ottoman Sunnism: Appropriation of Islamic History and Ahl al-Baytism in Ottoman Literary and Historical Writing in the Sixteenth Century.” JESHO 60 (2017): 614–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Noah D. “Esotericism in a Manuscript Culture: Aḥmad al-Būnī and His Readers through the Mamlūk Period.” PhD diss., University of Michigan, 2014.Google Scholar
Gruber, Christiane. “The ‘Restored’ Shīʿī muṣḥaf as Divine Guide? The Practice of fāl-i Qurʾān in the Safavid Period.” Journal of Qur'anic Studies 13, no. 2 (2001): 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Peter, and Lockhart, Laurence, eds. The Cambridge History of Iran. Vol. 6, The Timurid and Safavid Periods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Katouzian, Homa. The Persians: Ancient, Mediaeval and Modern Iran. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Kia, Mana. Persianate Selves: Memories of Place and Origin before Nationalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Lawson, Todd. “The Dawning Places of the Lights of Certainty in the Divine Secrets Connected with the Commander of the Faithful by Rajab Bursī (d. 1411),” in The Heritage of Sufism, vol. 2, The Legacy of Medieval Persian Sufism (1150–1500), edited by Lewisohn, Leonard, 261–76. Oxford: Oneworld, 1999.Google Scholar
Majlisī, Muḥammad Bāqir. Biḥār al-anwār. 110 vols. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Wafāʾ/Dār al-Riḍā, 1403/1983.Google Scholar
Mansouri, Mohammad Amin. “Walāya between Lettrism and Astrology: The Occult Mysticism of Sayyid Ḥaydar Āmulī (d. c. 787/1385).” Journal of Sufi Studies 9 (2020): 161–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzaoui, Michel M. The Origins of the Ṣafawids: Šī’ism, Ṣūfism, and the Ġulāt. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner, 1972.Google Scholar
McChesney, R. D. Waqf in Central Asia: Four Hundred Years in the History of a Muslim Shrine, 1480–1889. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “The New Brethren of Purity: Ibn Turka and the Renaissance of Pythagoreanism in the Early Modern Persian Cosmopolis.” Intellectual History of the Islamicate World 11 (forthcoming 2023).Google Scholar
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “Qizilbash Magic: An Edition of ʿAli Safi b. Husayn Vaʿiz Kashifi's Boon for Majd al-Din, Exemplar of Timurid-Safavid Sunni-Shiʿi Occultism.” Iran Namag 6, nos. 3–4 (forthcoming 2022).Google Scholar
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “The Occult Sciences in Safavid Iran and Safavid Occult Scientists Abroad.” In The Safavid World, edited by Matthee, Rudi, 403–27. New York: Routledge, 2022.Google Scholar
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “Is (Islamic) Occult Science Science?” Theology and Science 18, no. 2 (2020): 303–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “World as (Arabic) Text: Mīr Dāmād and the Neopythagoreanization of Philosophy in Safavid Iran.” Studia Islamica 114, no. 3 (2019): 378–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “Early Modern Islamicate Empire: New Forms of Religiopolitical Legitimacy.” In The Wiley Blackwell History of Islam, edited by Salvatore, Armando, Tottoli, Roberto, Rahimi, Babak, Fariduddin Attar, M., and Patel, Naznin, 353–75. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell, 2018.Google Scholar
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “The Quest for a Universal Science: The Occult Philosophy of Ṣāʾin al-Dīn Turka Iṣfahānī and Intellectual Millenarianism in Early Timurid Iran.” PhD diss., Yale University, 2012.Google Scholar
Mir-Kasimov, Orkhan. Words of Power: Ḥurūfī Teachings between Shiʿism and Sufism in Medieval Islam: The Original Doctrine of Faḍl Allāh Astarābādī. London: I.B. Tauris/Institute of Ismaili Studies, 2015.Google Scholar
Moin, A. Azfar. The Millennial Sovereign: Sacred Kingship and Sainthood in Islam. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Andrew J. Safavid Iran: Rebirth of a Persian Empire. London: I.B. Tauris, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, James. Polymaths of Islam: Power and Networks of Knowledge in Central Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Salvatore, Armando, Tottoli, Roberto, Rahimi, Babak, Fariduddin Attar, M., and Patel, Naznin, eds. The Wiley Blackwell History of Islam. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subtelny, Maria. “Kāshifī's Asrār-i qāsimī: A Late Timurid Manual of the Occult Sciences and Its Safavid Afterlife.” In Islamicate Occult Sciences in Theory and Practice, edited by Saif, Liana, Leoni, Francesca, Melvin-Koushki, Matthew, and Yahya, Farouk, 267–313. Leiden: Brill, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uy, Cyril V. II “Lost in a Sea of Letters: Saʿd al-Dīn Ḥamūya (d.1252) and the Plurality of Sufi Knowledge.” PhD diss., Brown University, 2021.Google Scholar
Viengkhou, Aaron. “Tawḥīd Divided: The Esoteric Orthodoxy of Sayyid Ḥaydar Āmulī (d. after 782/1380).” La Rosa di Paracelso 2 (2020 [2022]): 27–51.Google Scholar
Woods, John E. The Aqquyunlu: Clan, Confederation, Empire. Rev. ed. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1999.Google Scholar