Last updated 10th July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 August 2014
The current excavations taking place on the island of Ana in the Euphrates have naturally focused attention on the available literary references. The Islamic sources are especially rich and to some extent we are relatively well-served for the classical period too, not least from the graphic account provided by Ammianus Marcellinus of the Emperor Julian's attack on the island fortress in A.D. 363. It is clear from that account that the city was a Persian stronghold. Hence the presence of Anatha in the late fourth century Notitia Dignitatum must either be an anachronism or, more likely, an homonymous site: everything we know of the location of the Roman military installations in Mesopotamia and Syria after the peace concluded by Jovian in 363 militates against so advanced a post well down-stream from Dura Europus which itself was never re-occupied after the mid-third century sack.
What then was the status of Ana/Anatha in the earlier centuries of the Roman Empire? Apart from the reference in an unknown context in a fragment of Arrian relating to Trajan's Parthian War with the implication—as one would expect—that it was then Parthian, the literature is silent until the campaign of Julian. Fortunately we have some interesting epigraphic references which offer a clue.
1 Killick, R. and Roaf, M., “Excavations in Iraq, 1981-82”, Iraq 45 (1983), 202 ffGoogle Scholar.
2 Northedge, A., “Ana in the Classical and Islamic sources”, Sumer 39 (1983), 235–40Google Scholar; cf. Musil, A., The Middle Euphrates (1927), 345–9Google Scholar.
3 Amm. Marc, XXIV. 1.6–10. It is probably Ana which is the unnamed “fortified island held by a large garrison” mentioned by Zosimus (III. 14). The implications of Amm. Marc. XXIV. 1.10 is that Ana had been Persian since at least 297/8.
4 Not. Dig., Or. XXXIII. 20 Google Scholar.
5 Dussaud, R., Topographie Historique de la Syrie Antique et Médievale (1927), 274 fCrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Parthica [ed. Roos, , 64]Google Scholar.
7 Perkins, A., The Art of Dura (1973), 77 fGoogle Scholar.
8 CIS II, 3973 Google Scholar. Cf. Teixidor, J., “The Nabataean presence at Palmyra”, JAMES 5 (1973), 405–9Google Scholar.
9 Dunant, C., Le Sanctuaire de Baalshamin (1971) III, 65, no. 51Google Scholar. Gamla is placed by Cantineau (below, n. 10) at modem Gmeyla, 4 km downstream from Ana.
10 Cantineau, J., “Tadmorea”, Syria 14 (1933), 178–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Honigmann, E. and Maricq, A., Recherches sur les Res Gestae Divi Saporis (1953), 12 and 146 Google Scholar.
12 Welles, C. B. et al., The Excavations at Dura Europus, Final Report V. 1 The Parchments and Papyri (1959), 24 Google Scholar.
13 P. Dura 60 B.
14 Oates, D., “A note on three Latin inscriptions from Hatra”, Sumer 11 (1955), 39–43 Google Scholar. Cf. Maricq, , “Les dernières années de Hatra: l'alliance romaine”, Syria 34 (1957), 288–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chaumont, M. L., “A propos de la chute de Hatra”, Acla Antigua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 27 (1979), 207–37Google Scholar; Drijvers, A., “Hatra, Palmyra und Edessa”, ANRW, II.8. (1978), 825 fGoogle Scholar.
15 Herodian, VI. 5.
