Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:18:43.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Agricultural Settlements in the Sinjar Plain, Northern Iraq

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

N. Y. Merpert  and
R. M. Munchaev
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the spring of 1969 the Soviet archaeological expedition began extensive studies of early agricultural sites in north-western Iraq. Up to that time the investigation of archaeological cultures representing the early stages of development of food-producing economies in Mesopotamia had been confined to north-eastern Iraq and western Iran, the mountains of Kurdistan and the Zagros with their foothills and valleys. But in north-western Iraq, from Mosul to the Syrian frontier, there are areas whose natural resources offer an equally fruitful prospect for investigation of this process. One such area particularly favourable to agriculture from its earliest stages is the broad and fertile Sinjar plain. Eastward the plain borders on the Mosul region, beyond which lie the Kurdish foothills around Erbil and Kirkuk, and on the north it is bounded by Jebel Sinjar, rising to a height of c. 1250 m. This range reproduces on a small scale the natural conditions of the Zagros, and abounds in caves, but is as yet inadequately investigated. Winter rainfall is relatively high, and a number of small perennial streams flow from the hills into the soft alluvial soils of the plain, which are extremely fertile and favour the construction of simple irrigation systems; in places these now extend up to 15 km. south of the range.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , Autumn 1973 , pp. 93 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lees, G. M. and Falcon, N. L., Geographical Journal 118 (1952), 24–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jawad, Abdul Jalil, The Advent of the Era of Townships in Northern Mesopotamia, 8Google Scholar; Lloyd, S., Iraq 5 (1938), 123–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 S. Lloyd, op. cit., 128 n.

3 Ibid., 124–26.

4 The authors wish to express their gratitude to Professor David Oates and Dr. Joan Oates for information about the unpublished results of the survey and access to the material. For a reference to the earliest sites see Oates, J., Iraq 30 (1968), 4, n. 9Google Scholar; for Hassuna Samarra settlement, Oates, J. in Man, Settlement and Urbanism, ed. Ucko, , Tringham, and Dimbleby, , 300Google Scholar.

5 al Rimah, Tell, Oates, D., Iraq 27–30, 32 and 34Google Scholar; Taya, Tell, Reade, J. E., Iraq 30 and 33Google Scholar.

6 The group was first mentioned by Professor Seton Lloyd as no. 34 on his list of Sinjar sites, although he refers only to a “low mound with distinctive pottery”, among which he identified Samarra, Halaf and a few Northern ‘Ubaid sherds; op. cit., 138.

7 Lloyd, S. and Safar, F., JNES 4 (1945), 259, 271–75 and fig. 35Google Scholar.

8 The number of building levels can only be determined finally after the excavation of considerable areas of the settlement, and will no doubt be greater in the centre of the mound than in the stratigraphie trench. Level 8, reached here in 1971, is not the earliest. The levels are numbered from top to bottom.

9 Numbered from 1 to 100, increasing from west to east and north to south.

10 This is confirmed by the discovery of kiln-wasters nearby.

11 Round buildings are known from Hassuna, Level 1c, but they are very different from ours in size and, apparently, in purpose. JNES 4, 272 and fig. 28Google Scholar.

12 Ibid., 274–75.

13 The remains of buildings of Level 5 have been discovered throughout the area so far exposed, with the exception of the stratigraphie trench.

14 A similar extension of the houses can also be observed in modern Arab villages in Iraq; Nissen, H. J., Sumer 24 (1968), 107Google Scholar.

15 Mellaart, J., Earliest Civilisations of the Near East, 81 ff.Google Scholar; Lloyd and Safar, op. cit,, 273–74.

16 Similar round structures were found in Level 1c at Hassuna; see n. 11 above. The authors of the Hassuna report suggest that the open courtyards were used as cattle enclosures at night.

17 As noted above, round structures at Hassuna are found only in the earliest phase of the settlement, Level 1c.

18 van Loon, M. N. and Skinner, J. H., JNES 27 (1968), 267–75Google Scholar.

19 Kirkbride, D., Antiquity 42 (1968), 264–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 de Contenson, H., Syria 17 (1936), 19Google Scholar.

21 Kenyon, K. M.Digging up Jericho, 53–54, 71Google Scholar.

22 Smith, P. E. L., Iran 6 (1968), 159Google Scholar; 8 (1970), 179.

23 Braidwood, R. J., Çambel, H., Redman, C. L., Watson, P. J., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 68 (1971), 1236–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Such houses may be considered characteristic of the more advanced Hassuna and Samarra settlements. At Hassuna they have been found from Level 2 onwards, and the houses of Level 5 had 8–9 or even more rooms; JNES 4, 273, fig. 32 and Plate VIII, 1Google Scholar. The houses so far found at Matarrah had up to seven rooms; Braidwood, R. J., JNES 11 (1952), 6Google Scholar. The large houses in the lower level at Tell es-Sawwan had more than fourteen rooms; El-Wailly, F. and es-Soof, B. Abu, Sumer 21 (1965), 20 and Plates XIX–XXGoogle Scholar. Well-planned houses with up to 12 rooms have been discovered at Choga Mami; Oates, J., Iraq 31 (1969), 115 and Plate XXIVCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 JNES 4, 275Google Scholar.

26 Similar doorsills and benches have been noted at Hassuna; JNES 4, 274Google Scholar.

27 In Hassuna the earliest ovens in the shape of “a simple clay barrel tipped towards the ground at an angle of 30°” were found in Level 1b; JNES 4, 267Google Scholar. In the later levels vaulted ovens similar to those of Yarim Tepe I are widespread. The authors of the report call them “bread ovens” and remark that “they are only slightly different from the modern Arab tanour”; ibid., 262, 272, 275, etc. Similar ovens are known from settlements of the Samarra culture. At Matarrah an open hearth was found; JNES 11, 7Google Scholar. At Tell es-Sawwan vaulted ovens have been discovered, including large kilns for firing pottery.

28 At Hassuna, from Level 1b onwards, 12 infant burials in jars were discovered, one a pair of twins; JNES 4, 263, 267–68Google Scholar. At Tell es-Sawwan many infants were buried in shallow gypsum-lined pits in the corners of rooms; Sumer 21, 24. At the same settlement, in Buildings 1 and 2 of Level 1, more than 130 crouched skeletons, almost all children, were buried in narrow oval graves beneath the floors, accompanied by a rich inventory; ibid., 23, and K. A. Al-Adami, Sumer 14 (1968), 57. Isolated adult burials were also found at Hassuna; JNES 4, 267, 272Google Scholar. But no cemetery of the Hassuna culture has yet been discovered.

29 Braidwood, R. J. and Howe, B., SAOC 31, 43–44Google Scholar.

30 Meldgaard, J., Mortensen, P. and Thrane, H., Acta Archaeologica 34 (1963), 113 ffGoogle Scholar.

31 Hole, F., Flannery, K. and Neely, J., Prehistory and Human Ecology of the Deh Luran Plain, 352Google Scholar.

32 Braidwood, R. J., ILN, 12 22, 1960, 695Google Scholar.

33 Oates, J., Iraq 30 (1968), 3–4Google Scholar.

34 Masson, V. M., Srednaja Asia i Drevnii Vostok (Moscow-Leningrad, 1964), 51Google Scholar.

35 Thompson, R. Campbell and Mallowan, M. E. L., AAA 20 (1933), 127Google Scholar.

36 JNES 4, 261–62, 276–83Google Scholar.

37 Dabbagh, Takey, Sumer 21 (1965), 93Google Scholar.

38 Ibid., Plate I, types 2–4; Plate II, types 20–22, 24–35.

39 Ibid., Plate IV, types 53–64.

40 Ibid., Plate I, type 15; Plate II, type 36; Plate III, types 43–45.

41 Ibid., Plate III, type 42.

42 JNES 4, 262Google Scholar.

43 JNES 4, 279Google Scholar.

44 Samarran pottery has been the subject of much discussion since its first discovery in 1911 (E. Herzfeld, Die Ausgrabungen von Samarra, Band V: Die Vorgeschichtlichen Töpfereien von Samarra). It has been related to the Hassuna complex (Braidwood, R. J.et al., JNES 3 (1944), 65Google Scholar) and suggested by Braidwood in his prefatory remarks to the Hassuna report to be the product of specialized travelling craftsmen. Lloyd, and Safar, (JNES 4, 282)Google Scholar regard it as either a derivative of Hassuna or a direct import from outside, and the last suggestion may now be considered proven. The excavations at Tell es-Sawwan and Choga Mami have proved the existence in central Mesopotamia of the Samarran culture, akin to that of Hassuna and at times in close contact with it, but undoubtedly independent.

45 At Hassuna only one similar sherd was found; JNES 4, 281Google Scholar.

46 Iraq Museum, Baghdad, no. IM 50267.

47 At Hassuna these ornamental elements are characteristic only of the lower levels; JNES 4, fig. 6.

48 These “sling pellets” were very numerous. Their purpose seems to be controversial. Safar suggests that they might be heated in the ashes and used as pot-boilers; JNES 4, 267Google Scholar.

49 Similar beads have been found at Hassuna; cf. JNES 4, Plate XI, 1 and 2.

50 This is the largest collection of figurines strictly assignable to the Hassuna culture that has yet come to light. From Hassuna itself there are a few figurines, and many fine examples have been found at the contemporary Samarran settlements. es-Sawwan, Tell, El-Wailly, F. and es-Soof, B. Abu, Sumer 21 (1965), Plates XXVI, XXVII, XXXIGoogle Scholar; Mami, Choga, Oates, J., Iraq 31 (1969), Plates XXV–XXXGoogle Scholar; Hassuna, , JNES 4, 270 and Plate XVIIIGoogle Scholar. See also B. L. Goff, Symbols of Prehistoric Mesopotamia, fig. 53.

51 In this connection we may recall the phallic symbols often found in the graves at Tell es-Sawwan; Sumer 21, 22 and Plate XXVI.

52 Determined by S. W. Ganushevich and L. W. Prishchepenko.

53 The osteological material was examined in the field by a Hungarian archaeologist, S. Bökönyi, who visited our excavations, and the final study and identification was the work of distinguished Soviet palaeobotanist, the late Professor B. J. Tsalkine.

54 Lloyd and Safar considered that this phase was unrelated to the Hassuna culture and that the lowest level of Hassuna, 1a, should be ascribed to some other group of population. Braidwood, (JNES 4, 258)Google Scholar doubted this conclusion, postulating a coherent development with the same population, and this is confirmed by the discoveries at Yarim Tepe I.

55 Mortensen, P., Tell Shimshara, The Hassuna Period, 137, fig. 120Google Scholar.

56 Ingholt, H., Sumer 13 (1957), 215Google Scholar; V. M. Masson, op. cit. n. 34 above, 126; P. Mortensen, op. cit., 136.

57 P. Mortensen, op. cit., 136. The other five samples from Tell es-Sawwan Mortensen considers to be unreliable.

58 E.g. the dates for the Mohammed Jafar phase in south-west Iran, 5270 and 5870 B.C.; Hole, Flannery and Neely, op. cit. n. 31, 334.

59 M. von Oppenheim, Tell Halaf I. Die prähistorischen Funde.

60 Kaplan, G., BASOR 159 (1960), 32–36 (Palestinian connections)Google Scholar; Braidwood, R. J. and Braidwood, L. S., OIP 61 (Syria)Google Scholar; J. Garstang, Prehistoric Mersin (Cilicia).

61 Reilly, E. B., Türk Tarih, Arkeoloji ve Etnografya Dergisi 4 (1940), 145–178Google Scholar.

62 A typical Halaf pot has, for instance been found at Kyultepe, Nakhichevan, by O. A. Abiboulayev, and is on exhibition at the Museum of the History of Azerbaijan, Baku.

63 Mallowan, M. E. L., Iraq 9 (1947)Google Scholar.

64 Mallowan, M. E. L. and Rose, J. C., Iraq 2 (1933), Pt. 1Google Scholar.

65 Tobler, A. J., Excavations at Tepe Gawra, IIGoogle Scholar.

66 For instance in general works such as A. L. Perkins, The Comparative Archaeology of Early Mesopotamia, and Mellaart, J., The Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Ages in the Hear East and Anatolia, 15–20Google Scholar.

67 Mallowan and Rose, op. cit.

68 The floors, and sometimes the walls, of most of the domestic structures at Yarim Tepe II were coated with the same clay, obtained from the nearby stream.

69 There are well-known examples of the same combination of a round and a rectangular room at Arpachiyah; there the surviving walls were of stone, but there were many other examples of pisé construction (Mallowan and Rose, op. cit., fig. 13).

70 Up to now some 30 tholoi, including the large houses and smaller subsidiary rooms, have been found at Yarim Tepe II, more than in all other Halaf sites combined. At Arpachiyah there were 10, at Tepe Gawra 1, at Nuzi 2, at Çayönü in south-east Turkey 9 (Braidwood, R. J.et al., Science 164, no. 3885 (1969), 1275–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar).

71 Pisé buildings of tholos type were also found in the earliest level of Yarim Tepe II, in the step trench dug in 1969.

72 Koushnariova, K. H. and Chubinishvili, T. N., Ancient Cultures of the Southern Caucasus, V–VIII Millennia B.C., 21–58Google Scholar; Djaparidze, O. M. and Djavahishvili, A. I., The Culture of the Earliest Agricultural Population in the territory of Georgia (Tbilisi, 1971)Google Scholar.

73 J. Mellaart, Earliest Civilizations of the Near East.

74 Mallowan, M. E. L., Iraq 8 (1946), 124 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Twenty-five Years of Mesopotamian Discovery, 39–40 and fig. 16.

75 The specialized study of the osteological material from Yarim Tepe I and II is at present in the hands of V. I. Bibikova.

76 Dabbagh, Takey, Sumer 22 (1966), 23–43Google Scholar.

77 Ibid., Plates XIV–XXIX.

78 von Oppenheim, M., Tell Halaf IGoogle Scholar.

79 A representation of a spotted beast of prey, roughly delineated and in bad condition, occurs on a sherd from Tepe Gawra, Level XII; Tobler, A. J., Tepe Gawra II, 265 and Plate CXXXGoogle Scholar.

80 Cf. Porada, E., in Chronologies in Old World Archaeology, 177Google Scholar.