Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:44:23.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

TWO OLD BABYLONIAN MARRIAGE CONTRACTS FROM ISIN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2020

Abstract

Our study establishes that two tablets from the Iraq Museum are marriage contracts dating to the Old Babylonian period and in particular from the city of Isin. The dating formula of IM 201688 refers to a hitherto unpublished year name for Erra-imittī, who became king of Isin in 1868 BC. The event concerns the making of four large copper lions as a votive offering. This might have been done in preparation for a military campaign in connection with the rivalry between Isin and Larsa. The dating formula of IM 183636 is completely damaged. However, the text includes a witness described as a citizen of Isin. These two tablets are a very useful addition to the limited number of published OB marriage contracts and especially those from Isin. The tablets were written using formulaic legal expressions in Sumerian throughout with the exception of proper names. Both texts show a remarkably equal treatment of the two spouses in matters relating to compensation in the event of divorce.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 82 , December 2020 , pp. 125 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-A'raji, H. and Fadhil, K. 2016. “al-Usra fi al-Iraq al-Qadeem fi Dhaw’ al-Nusoos al-Adabiya” in Majallat Kulliyat al-Tarbiya, ʿAdad Khāṣ bi al-Muʾtamar al-ʿAlī al-Duwalī al-Tāsiʿ. Wasit: Faculty of Education, University of Wasit. Pp. 331360.Google Scholar
Al-Ansary, D. F. 2000. al-Usra al-Iraqiya al-Qadeema fi dhaw’ al-Nusoos al-Mismariya. Baghdad: Kulliyat al-Adaab, Jami'at Baghdad.Google Scholar
Al-Hashimi, R. J. 1971. Nidham al-A'ila fi al-‘ahd al-Babili al-Qadeem. Baghdad: Dar Al-Andalus.Google Scholar
Al-Hashimi, R. J. 1985. Hadharat al-Iraq, al-Qanoon wal Ahwal al-shakhsiya. Vol II. Baghdad: Hurriya Publications.Google Scholar
Aqrawi, Th. S. 1978. al-Mar'a wa dawruha wa makanatuha fi Hadharat Wadi al-Rafidayn. Baghdad: Dar Al-Andalus.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, P.-A. 2018. A History of Babylon 2200 BC – AD 75. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Démare-Lafont, S. 2012. “Le Marriage Babylonien – une approche historiographique.” Zeitschrift für Altorientalische und Biblische Rechtsgeschichte 18: 175190.Google Scholar
Driver, G. and Miles, J. C. 1952. The Babylonian Laws. Part I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Driver, G. and Miles, J. C. 1955. The Babylonian laws. Part II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Durant, W. 1942. The Story of Civilisation. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Greengus, S. 1969. “The Old Babylonian Marriage Contract.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 89: 505532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddeeris, A. 2016. The Old Babylonian Legal and Administrative Texts in the Hilprecht Collection Jena. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Halloran, J. A. 2006. Sumerian Lexicon. Los Angeles: Logogram Publishing.Google Scholar
Harris, R. 1974. “The Case of Three Babylonian Marriage Contracts.Journal of Near Eastern Studies 33, 363369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsberger, B. 1968. “Jungfräulichkeit: Ein Beitrag zum Thema ‘Beilager und Eheschliessung’” in Ankum, J.A., Feenstra, R., Leemans, W.F. (eds) Symbolae iuridicae et historicae Martino David dedicatae. Tomus alter. Iura Orientis Antiqui. Leiden: Brill. Pp. 41105.Google Scholar
Moscati, S. 1957. Ancient Semitic Civilisations. London: Elek Books.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N. 1992. Early Mesopotamian Society and Economy at the Dawn of History. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roth, M. T. 1995. Law Collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Sigrist, M. and Damerow, P. 2001. Mesopotamian Year Names. https://cdli.ucla.edu/tools/yearnames/yearnames.htm (last accessed 30.07.2020).Google Scholar
Stol, M. 1995. “Women in Mesopotamia.Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 38/2: 123144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stol, M. 2012. “Payment of the Old Babylonian Brideprice” in Abraham, K. and Fleishman, J. (eds) Looking at the Ancient Near East and the Bible through the Same Eyes. A Tribute to Aaron Skaist. Bethesda, Maryland: CDL Press. Pp. 131167.Google Scholar
Sulaiman, A. 1988. al-Hayat al-Ijtimyaiya wal Khadamat fi al-Azmina al-Tarikhiya wal-qadeema. Vol. I. Baghdad: Hurriya.Google Scholar
Sulaiman, A. 1993. al-Iraq fil Tareekh al-Qadeem Vol II. Mosul: Dar al-Kutub Lil-Tiba'a.Google Scholar
Veenhof, K. R. 2003. “Fatherhood is a Matter of Opinion” in Sallaberger, W., Volk, K. and Zgoll, A. (eds) Literatur, Politik und Recht im Mesopotamien. Festschrift für Claus Wilcke. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. Pp. 313332.Google Scholar
Westbrook, R. 1988. Old Babylonian Marriage Law. Archiv für Orientforschung Beiheft 23. Horn: Berger und Söhne.Google Scholar
Westbrook, R. 1995. “A Death in the Family: Codex Eshnunna 17–18 Revisited.Israel Law Review 29, 3242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westbrook, R. 1998. “The Female Slave” in Matthews, V.H., Levinson, B.M. and Frymer-Kensky, T.S. (eds) Gender and Law in the Hebrew Bible and the Ancient Near East. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, Supplement Series 262. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press. Pp. 214238.Google Scholar