Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T06:21:21.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A seal-cutter's trial-piece in Berlin and a new look at the Diqdiqqeh lapidary workshops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Extract

Seal-cutter's trial-pieces present a rarity among Mesopotamian artifacts. To my knowledge the only example apart from the trial-pieces found by C. L. Woolley at Diqdiqqeh and Ur was for decades in a Swiss private collection and is now in the Vorderasiatisches Museum in Berlin (Figs. 4b and 5).

Though trial-pieces are, like moulds, engraved in intaglio they exhibit three distinct features: form, material and a lack of proficiency of many engravings (Figs. 1–5). Most have irregular contours and uneven surfaces; of the fourteen trial-pieces twelve are limestone or calcite and two potsherds. Although some surfaces are smoothed or polished, they show scratches and indentures, and one piece has a drill-hole on the roughly hewn back. The pieces look like leftovers from or parts of broken objects. Thus material for trial-pieces was only available in, or in proximity to workshops where leftovers from larger stone objects would be available to seal-cutters. Many figures on the trial-pieces demonstrate that the seal-cutter was not very accomplished (Figs. 1f, 2b, 3), two are skillfully executed by a master (Figs. 2a, 4a); most, however, are of average quality (Figs, 1ad, 2c, 5), evidence for a workshop with masters and apprentices. The rarity of trial-pieces suggests that most seal-cutters trained on cylinders.

Of the provenanced trial-pieces all but one, which comes from the Gipar in Ur, were found at Diqdiqqeh. According to the excavators Diqdiqqeh, situated one mile south-east of the city wall of Ur, developed into an artisans' quarter starting with the Ur III period. The surface of this suburb was scattered with ruins of houses and numerous seals, terracottas, amulets and beads. Proportionally these were more numerous than at Ur, which could only be explained by the location of workshops in this area.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1995 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Abbreviations according to Å. Sjöberg, Sumerian Dictionary A (1993) and Reallexikon der Assyriologie 7 (1987–1990); additional abbreviations:

BM 2 (in Appendix 3) = Collon, 1982

BM 3 (in Appendix 3) = Collon, 1986

References

Boehmer, R. M., 1965. Die Entwicklung der Glyptik während der Akkad-Zeit, UAVA 4, Berlin.Google Scholar
Charpin, D., 1980. Archives familiales et propriété privée en Babylonie ancienne: Etudes des documents de “Tell Sifr”, Geneva.Google Scholar
Collon, D., 1982. Catalogue of Western Asiatic Seals in the British Museum; Cylinder Seals II: Akkadian — Post Akkadian — Ur III Periods, London.Google Scholar
Collon, D., 1986. Catalogue of Western Asiatic Seals in the British Museum; Cylinder Seals III: Isin-Larsa and Old Babylonian Periods, London.Google Scholar
Collon, D., 1987. First Impressions; Cylinder Seals in the Ancient Near East, London.Google Scholar
Gadd, C. J., 1932. Seals of Ancient Indian Style found at Ur, Proceedings of the British Academy 18 (1932): pp. 322.Google Scholar
Matthews, D. M., 1990. Principles of Composition in Near Eastern Glyptic of the Late Second Millenium B.C., Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis, Series Archaeologica 8, Freiburg (CH) and Göttingen.Google Scholar