Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T01:17:47.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Terracotta Plaques from Kish and Hursagkalama, c. 1850 to 1650 B.C.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

P. R. S. Moorey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The small moulded terracotta plaques made in Mesopotamia in the first three or four centuries of the second millennium B.C. provide a unique, if often enigmatic, corpus of evidence for the popular iconography of the period. They embrace scenes of myth, ritual and daily life unmatched in glyptic save during the Akkadian period, and then only on artefacts which their quality suggests were common currency only among the upper classes. Three major studies have so far been devoted to these plaques, the most recent, that by Barrelet, still in progress. Single volumes have covered the terracottas of Nippur and Uruk, whilst those found in excavations at many other sites are scattered through the literature. Barrelet has provided an excellent, fully illustrated survey of the terracottas from de Genouillac's excavations at Kish in 1912 now in the Louvre (the majority of those which he preserved), but the extensive collection recorded by the Oxford—Field Museum (Chicago) Expedition (O.F.M.E.) of 1923–33 remains largely unpublished and is now divided between Baghdad, Chicago and Oxford. This paper seeks to publish as economically as possible the repertory of motifs found at Kish, paying particular attention to recorded findspots and the popularity of the motif elsewhere. This information seems particularly important in any attempt to unravel the social significance of these objects, to which no explicit documentary references are yet known. The links between the religious iconography of these plaques and Old Babylonian glyptic has long been apparent; but in addition to the stereotyped combinations of deities and their attributes, which are common to the two, the plaques offer a quite fresh range of scenes.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , Autumn 1975 , pp. 79 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Boehmer, R. M., Die Entwicklung der Glyptik während der Akkad-Zeit (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Buren, E. D. van, Clay Figurines of Babylonia and Assyria (New Haven, 1930)Google Scholar; Opificius, R., Das Altbabylonische Terrakoltarelief (Berlin, 1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barrelet, M-T., Figurines et Reliefs en Terre Cuite de la Mesopotamie Antique I (Paris, 1968)Google Scholar.

3 For Bibliography see M-T. Barrelet, op. cit., 483–583.

4 Indeed so much so that Barrelet believed few had been found, ibid., 325.

5 For the primary types see: Barrelet, Pl. LXII; I have traced no examples, as were found at Nippur (McCown, D. E., Nippur I, (Chicago, 1967)Google Scholar, Pl. 127.6, 134.8), where their legs are flanked by phalli in more explicit definition of their significance.

6 For the site of Kish in general see Gibson, M., The City and Area of Kish (Field Research Projects; Miami, 1972)Google Scholar; for the Ingharra sequence particularly, also Moorey, P. R. S., Iraq 28 (1966), 18–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Gibson, Fig. 39.

8 Ibid., Figs. 54–60.

9 Ibid., 87.

10 Barrelet, 326; Opificius, 8–9. Professor Norman Yoffee of Arizona University, who is restudying the Old Babylonian texts from Uhaimir, tells me that de Genouillac's cluster towards the middle of the period.

11 The smaller complete plaques measure approximately 8.0 × 5.5 cm; the larger model chariot fronts c. 17.0 × 8.5 cm.

12 Roberts, J. J., The Earliest Semitic Pantheon (Baltimore, 1972), 56Google Scholar.

13 CANES, no. 427.

14 Kupper, J., L'iconographie du dieu Amurru (Brussels, 1961), 9 ff.Google Scholar; Professor W. G. Lambert has recently suggested that he is Nin-Šubur, but cf. the remarks of Barbara Parker, above p. 35 n. 35.

15 Buchanan, B., Catalogue of Ancient Near Eastern Seals in the Ashmolean Museum I (1966), no. 517Google Scholar.

16 Symbols, 148.

17 Barrelet, 182–3.

18 Opificius, 90–5; Weiher, E. von, Der babylonische Gott Nergai (1971)Google Scholar.

19 Osten, H. H. van der, Ancient Near Eastern Seals… Newell (Chicago, 1934), no. 213Google Scholar.

20 Porada, E., Sumer 7 (1951), 66–7Google Scholar.

21 Sollberger, E., Iraq 31 (1969), 90–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Jacobsen, T., Towards the Image of Tammuz … (Harvard, 1970), p. 28Google Scholar; see particularly Barrelet, M.-T., Syria 32 (1955), 222–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar for the iconography.

23 CANES I, no. 379; Iraq 35 (1973)Google Scholar, Pl. XXXV. 20.

24 Barrelet, 340.

25 Fifth Preliminary Report of the Iraq Expedition (O.I.C. 20, 1936)Google Scholar, Fig. 67.

26 Barrelet, 340; Ashmolean 1949.920: 10.0 H; 7.7 W.

27 Barrelet, 339–40.

28 Opificius, 200–2.

29 Opificius, 210; Barrelet, 409.

30 Porada, E., Studies Presented to A. Leo Oppenheim (Chicago, 1964), 159–166Google Scholar.

31 Symbols, 74–82.

32 Ibid., 60.

33 Ibid., 14 ff.; 62.

34 Barrelet, nos. 168 ff.

35 Opificius, 115–6.

36 Barrelet, 410–11.

37 Oates, D., Iraq 27 (1965), 72Google Scholar, Pl. XVIb.

38 Ox. 1930.209 (KM 142).

39 Kich II, Pl. XIV.4 (= Barrelet, no. 677).

40 Barrelet, no. 831 said to be from Tell Asmar.

41 Frankfort, H., Cylinder Seals (London, 1939), 174–5Google Scholar.

42 Opificius, nos. 402–16.

43 H. Frankfort, op. cit., 161.

44 Ibid., 174.

45 Buren, E. D. van, The Fauna of Ancient Mesopotamia Rome, 1939), 87–8Google Scholar.

46 Ibid., 23.

47 Opificius, 88–9; McCown, D. E., Nippur I, Pl. 138.6–8Google Scholar.

48 Barrelet, 408.

49 Murray, M., J. R. Anthropological Soc., 1934, 93 ffGoogle Scholar.

50 Legrain, L., Ur Excavations IIIGoogle Scholar, nos. 268–70; E. Andrae, Assur JIT, Pl. 45 k.

51 W. Andrae, op. cit., Pl. 45a, b.

52 Lambert, M., RA 42 (1948), 198Google Scholar, figure; McCown, D. E., Nippur IGoogle Scholar, Pl. 137.6.

53 Opificius, 166–8; Barrelet, 292; Seibert, I., Die Frau im Alten Orient (Leipzig, 1973)Google Scholar, Pl. 24, 26–7, 38; Salonen, A., Die Möbel des Alten Mesopotamien (Helsinki, 1963)Google Scholar, Pl. XVIII, XIX.2.

54 Porada, E. in Vorderasiatische Archäologie (Moortgat Festschrift), (Berlin, 1964)Google Scholar, Pl. 33.4.

55 Opificius, 235.

56 W. Andrae, Assur JIT, Pl. 45.

57 Seyrig, H., Syria 32 (1955), 38–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kramer, S. N., The Sacred Marriage Rile, (Bloomington, 1969)Google Scholar.

58 Biggs, R. D., ŠA.ZI.GA: Ancient Mesopotamian Potency Incantations (New York, 1967)Google Scholar; Ebeling, E., “Liebeszauber im Alten Orient“, MAOG 1/1 (1925)Google Scholar.

59 R. D. Biggs, op. cit., 10,28; see the comprehensive review by Cooper, J. S., under “Heilige Hochzeit,” in RIA IV (1975), 259–269Google Scholar.

60 Opificius, 88, no. 280, Pl. 5.

61 Kich II, Pl. IX.5.

62 Porada, E., Sumer 7 (1951), 66–8Google Scholar.

63 Delaporte, L., Catalogue des Cylindres… Louvre II, no. 477Google Scholar, Pl. 112, 9a, b.

64 Frankfort, H., The Gimilsin Temple and the Palace at Tell Asmar (Chicago, 1940)Google Scholar, Fig. 100A–B, p. 202.

65 Strommenger, E., Bagh. Mitt. 2 (1963)Google Scholar, Pl. 15–18: good photographs; Moortgat, E., The Art of Ancient Mesopotamia (London, 1969), 52Google Scholar, n. 255 for an Ur III date.

66 Klengel-Brandt, E., Forschungen und Berichte: Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, 5 (1962), 10–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Plate: VA Bab. 655.

67 Opificius, nos. 487–9; see for war scenes at Larsa, A. Parrot, Iraq 31 (1969), 64–7Google Scholar.

68 Barrelet, 409–10.

69 Loftus, W. K., Travels and Researches in Chaldasa and Susiana (London, 1857), 257 ff.Google Scholar; figure in text = BM WA 91906.

70 Salonen, A., Die Wasserfahrzeuge in Babylonien (Helsinki, 1939)Google Scholar, Pl. VII.3.

71 Compare: fruit picking—van Buren, Fig. 138; carpenters—Barrelet, nos. 778–9.

72 Opificius, 161–5; Barrelet, 387–8.

73 Opificius, Pl. 18 no. 584; figurines of monkey flute-players at Kish: 1914 (FM 229933); KM 506 (FM 228746).

74 McCown, D. E., Nippur I, 83 ff.Google Scholar; also Frankfort, H., The Gimilsin Temple …, 206 ffGoogle Scholar.

75 See reference under note 25.

76 Much remains to be done on the textual evidence for the deities worshipped at Kish and Hursagkalama; for the moment see Renger, J., Heidelberger Studien (Wiesbaden, 1967), 142, 144Google Scholar.

77 Limet, H., Les légendes des sceaux cassites (Brussels, 1971)Google Scholar.

78 Goff, B. L., Symbols of Prehistoric Mesopotamia (New Haven, 1963), 162 ffGoogle Scholar.

79 Parrot, A., MAM II, Le Palais: Documents et Monuments (Paris, 1959), 33 ffGoogle Scholar.