No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Politics after Parnell
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2016
Extract
Politics in the era of Parnell and his contemporaries continues to exert immense fascination. The five biographical (in the instance of Philip Bull’s book semi-biographical) studies surveyed add ample texture to understanding this much-ploughed field. At the same time these works demonstrate the importance of biography as a tool for interpreting the past. Doubt about the value of biography as a form of academic historical inquiry has recently been revived by the director of the Institute of Historical Research at the University of London, Patrick O’Brien. O’Brien insists that ‘unless the outcomes of a policy or set of policies are recognised by historians as significant and until those policies can be attributed in large measure to the ideas and leadership exercised by prominent politicians, then their lives, however deeply researched and readable, contribute very little to an understanding of the history of government and politics’. None of these studies were written with his strictures in mind, but they may well serve as a collective refutation, at least as far as the Irish past is concerned. They are also a testimony to the impress of F. S. L. Lyons on modern scholarship, if only in the sense that several challenge his verdicts.
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd 1997
References
1 O’Brien, Patrick, ‘Is political biography a good thing?’ in Contemporary British History, x (winter 1996), pp 60–66 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Ibid., p. 65.
3 T.M. Healy. By Callanan, Frank. Pp xxvii, 754. Cork: Cork University Press. 1996. IR£25Google Scholar.
4 Lyons, F.S.L., The Irish Parliamentary Party, 1890–1910 (London, 1951), p. 29 Google Scholar.
5 Bull, Philip, ‘The fall of Parnell, the political context of his intransigence’ in Boyce, D. George and O’Day, Alan (eds), Parnell in perspective (London, 1991), pp 129–47 Google Scholar.
6 Bew, Paul C.S. Parnell (Dublin, 1980)Google Scholar; idem, Conflict and conciliation in Ireland, 1890–1910: Parnellites and radical agrarians (Oxford, 1987).
7 Lyons, Irish Parliamentary Party, p. 41.
8 Justin Mccarthy. By Doyle, Eugene J.. Pp 68. Dundalk: Dundalgan Press, for the Historical Association of Ireland. 1996. IR£6 paperback. (Life and Times Series, no. 7)Google Scholar
John Redmond. By Bew, Paul. Pp 59. Dundalk: Dundalgan Press, for the Historical Association of Ireland. 1996. IR£6 paperback. (Life and Times Series, no. 8)Google Scholar
8 United Ireland, 27 Dec. 1890 (my italics).
9 Lyons, Irish Parliamentary Party, p. 40.
10 See O’Callaghan, Margaret, British high politics and a nationalist Ireland (Cork, 1994).Google Scholar
12 McCready, H.W., ‘Home rule and the Liberal Party, 1899–1906’ in I.H.S., xiii, no. 50 (Sept. 1963), pp 316-48Google Scholar.
13 Mansergh, Nicholas, The unsolved question: the Anglo-Irish settlement and its undoing, 1912–72 (New Haven & London, 1991), p. 811 Google Scholar.
14 Land, politics and nationalism: a study of the Irish land question. By Bull, Philip. Pp x, 242. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan. 1996. IR£35 hardback; IR£14.99 paperbackGoogle Scholar.
15 Ibid., p. 170.
16 Foster, R.F., Paddy and Mr Punch: connections in Irish and English history (London, 1993), pp 262–80 Google Scholar.
17 Bew, Paul, Ideology and the Irish question: Ulster unionism and Irish nationalism, 1912–1916 (Oxford, 1994), p. xvii Google Scholar.
18 Fitzpatrick, David, Politics and Irish life, 1913–1921: provincial experience of war and revolution (Dublin, 1977), pp 85-7, 93-4, 100Google Scholar.
19 Bew, Conflict & conciliation; Jones, David Seth, Graziers, land reform, and political conflict in Ireland (Washington, D.C., 1995)Google Scholar.
20 Colonel Edward Saunderson: land and loyalty in Victorian Ireland. By Jackson, Alvin. Pp xi, 276. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1995. £35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
21 O’Brien, ‘Is political biography a good thing?’, p. 66.