Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T02:04:38.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What influences postgraduate psychiatric trainees’ attitudes to clinical audit?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2017

S. McWilliams  and
S. Schofield
S. McWilliams*
Affiliation:
Saint John of God Hospital, Stillorgan, Co Dublin, Ireland
S. Schofield
Affiliation:
Centre for Medical Education, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: S. McWilliams MD, Saint John of God Hospital, Stillorgan, Co Dublin, A94FH92 Ireland. (Email: stephen.mcwilliams@sjog.ie)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

Clinical audit is an important component of safe and ethical practice but many clinicians cite barriers to engagement in audit.

Methodology

A total of 81 basic specialist trainees in psychiatry were surveyed in terms of their basic demographic details and their knowledge, direct experience and attitudes in relation to clinical audit.

Results

Among the 49 (60.5%) who responded, 57.1% had received formal training in audit, but only 20.4% had received more than four hours of training in their whole career. The median positivity score was 30 out of a possible 54 (range 12–40), suggesting that participating trainees were barely more than ‘undecided’ overall when it comes to positive attitudes to clinical audit. Age, nationality and specific training did not predict attitudes to clinical audit. Gender, years of clinical experience and direct experience of clinical audit did not significantly predict attitudes to clinical audit, but these findings are at odds with some previous research.

Discussion

Much work is needed in improving postgraduate trainees’ attitudes to clinical audit, given that clinical audit is essential for good medical practice. Ours is an initial study of this area of training limited by sample size and the narrowness of the group tested. Further study of other specialities, higher trainees and consultant trainers would further enhance our understanding.

Keywords

Attitudesclinical auditknowledgetraining
Type
Short Report
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 106 - 110
Copyright
© College of Psychiatrists of Ireland 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burgess, R (2011). How Foundation Year Doctors Can Get the Most from their Clinical Audit Project. Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership: London.Google Scholar
Chambers, R, Bowyer, S, Campbell, I (1996). Investigation into the attitudes of general practitioners in Staffordshire to medical audit. Quality and Safety in Health Care 5, 13–19.Google Scholar
Chief Medical Officer (2006). Good Doctors, Safer Patients. Department of Health: London.10.1136/qshc.5.1.13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
College of Psychiatrists of Ireland (2011). Professional competence for psychiatrists including CPD & clinical audit, Dublin.Google Scholar
Daly, E, Brennan, D, Dowling, S, Plant, G (2012). What do general practitioners think of the new professional competence scheme? Irish Medical Journal 105, 114–115.Google Scholar
Daveson, BA, Simon, ST, Benalia, H, Downing J, Higginson IJ, Harding R, Bauseweir C, PRISMA, Monteiro Calanzani N(2012). Are we heading in the same direction? European and African doctors’ and nurses’ views and experiences regarding outcome measurement in palliative care. Palliative Medicine 26, 242–249.Google ScholarPubMed
Dixon, N (2010). Guide to Involving Junior Doctors in Clinical Audit. Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership.10.1177/0269216311409614CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ertl-Wagner, B, Steinbrucker, S (2011). (No) fear of audits? Control is good, trust is better. Audits as a core element of quality management. Radiologe 51, 851–858.Google Scholar
Filipe, HP, Silva, ED, Stulting, AA, Golnik, KC (2014). Continuing professional development: best practices. Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology 21, 134–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firth-Cozens, J, Storer, D (1992). Registrars’ perceptions of their audit activities. Quality and Safety in Health Care 1, 161–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flottorp, AS, Jamtvedt, G, Gibbs, B, McKee, M (2010). Using Audit and Feedback to Health Professionals to Improve the Quality and Safety of Health Care. World Health Organisation Copenhagen.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, P (2012). Medical education: time to go back to school. Medical Teacher 34, 668.Google Scholar
Jamtvedt, G, Young, JM, Kristofferson, DT, O’Brien, MA, Oxman, AD (2007). Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Review). Cochrane Collaboration Library. (4), article no. CD000259. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joiner, AB, Hussain, N, Duddu, V, Chaudhry, IB (2015). Medical professionalism education for psychiatry trainees: does it meet standards? Australasian Psychiatry 23, 72–75.10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maisonneuve, H, Touboul, C, Bonnelye, G, Bertrand, D (2008). French hospital doctors attend many educational programmes but have organizational and financial difficulties for their continuing medical education. La Presse Medicale 37, 1391–1396.10.1177/1039856214563847CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medical Council (2011). Professional Competence Guidelines for Doctors. Medical Council: Dublin.10.1016/j.lpm.2008.06.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2002). Principles for Best Practice in Clinical Audit. Radcliffe Medical Press: London.Google Scholar
Ndoro, S (2014). Effective multidisciplinary working: the key to high-quality care. British Journal of Nursing 23, 724–727.Google Scholar
Nikkar-Esfahani, A, Jamjoom, AA, Fitzgerald, JE (2012). Extracurricular participation in research and audit by medical students: opportunities, obstacles, motivation and outcomes. Medical Teacher 34, e317–e324.10.12968/bjon.2014.23.13.724CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrem, LM, O’Neill, MB (2012). Assessment of paediatric clinical audit. Irish Medical Journal 105, 55–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Psychiatrists (2009). A Competency Based Curriculum for Specialist Training in Psychiatry: Specialist Module in General Psychiatry. Royal College of Psychiatrists: London.Google ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Psychiatrists (2012). Revalidation Guidance for Psychiatrists. (College Report CR172). Royal College of Psychiatrists: London.Google Scholar
Sax, LJ, Gilmartin, SK, Bryant, AN (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education 44, 409–432.Google Scholar
Swanwick, G(editor) (2012). Curriculum for Basic and Higher Specialist Training in Psychiatry. College of Psychiatrists of Ireland: Dublin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar