Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T03:10:37.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Aharonov Ruling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2014

Elad Peled
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Cases
Information
Israel Law Review , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , Spring 2001 , pp. 138 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bank Otzar Hachayal v. Aharonov 53(4) P.D. 199Google Scholar.

2 23 L.S.I. (1968-1969), 283.

3 Boker v. Anglo-Israeli Company for Management and Liability 25(2) P.D. 121.

4 Stern v. Stern 22(2) P.D. 36.

5 Aharonov case, supra n. 1, at 226.

6 “Where a person has undertaken to effect a transaction in immovable property, and before it is completed by registration he undertakes towards another person to effect a conflicting transaction, the right of the party to the first transaction shall prevail; Provided that if the party to the second transaction has acted in good faith and for consideration, and such transaction is registered while he is still in good faith, his right shall prevail”.

7 25 L.S.I. (1970-1971) 175.

8 Aharonov case, supra n. 1, at 240.

9 Ibid., at 235.

10 Ibid., at 278-279, 288.

11 Ibid., at 236-237.

12 Ibid., at 288.

13 The Attorney General's Representative in the General Custodian's office v. Hartfeld 49(3) P.D. 854.

14 21 L.S.I. (1966-1967) 44.