Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T06:58:09.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics and Strategies of Defending Human Rights: The Israeli Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2014

Assaf Meydani  and
Shlomo Mizrahi
Get access

Abstract

This paper examines the politics of defending human rights, based on Public Choice Theory. Human rights organizations in Israel turn to the court to defend human rights. We argue that this strategy may prove ineffective in terms of defending human rights for the long run for various reasons. First, the politics of defending human rights is very complex where the power circle beside the court and human rights organizations includes also the relations between politicians, bureaucrats and the public. Second, the political culture that has been established in Israeli society since the 1980s is such that relations between citizens and politicians are based on a bottom-up orientation. Thus, norms and social changes can be hardly imposed from top down, but mainly evolve from bottom up. Directing all human rights strategies toward an elitist institution such as the Supreme Court may bear results in the short run but in the long run attitude change as well as policy decisions towards defending human rights are likely to emerge due to demands from society. Third, by empowering the court, human rights organizations disconnect these issues from the vast majority of Israeli citizens discouraging belief change. The paper concludes that defending human rights must include also attempts of mass mobilization which will create the grounds for human rights organizations to turn to the legislative authorities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Israel Law Review , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , Spring 2006 , pp. 39 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The Academic College of Tel-Aviv-Yafo, the School of Government and Society; Email asafmei@mta.ac.il.

**

Department of Public Policy and Administration, School of Management, Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Email: shlomom@som.bgu.ac.il.

References

1 See, eg., Barak-Erez, Daphne, Civil Rights and Privatization in Israel, 28 Isr. Y.B. Hum. Rts. 203 (1999)Google Scholar; Dotan, Yoav & Hofnung, Mcnachcm, Interest Groups in the Israeli High Court of Justice: Measuring Success in Litigation and In-Out-Of Court Settlements, 23 Law & Pol'Y 1 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hofnung, Menachem, Israeli Constitutional Politics: the Fragility of Impartiality, 5 Isr. Aff. 34–54 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barzilai, Gad, Courts as Hegemonic Institutions: The Israeli Supreme Court in a Comparative Perspective, 5 Isr. Aff. 15 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 See, e.g., Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C. & Sikkink, Kathryn, The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices, in The Power of Human Rights, International Norms and Domestic Change, (Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C. & Sikkink, Kathryn, eds. 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Camiel, Kenneth, The Emergence of Human Rights Politics in the United States, 86 J. Am. History 1231–1250 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Keith, Linda C., Constitutional Provisions for Individual Human Rights (1977-1996): Are they More than Mere “Window Dressing?,” 55(1) Pol. Res. Q. 111 (2002)Google Scholar.

3 Maurice W. Cranston, John Locke (1969).

4 James Steintrager, Bentham (1977).

5 Barak-Erez, supra note 1. According to Barak-Erez a minimum of social services including health and education must be obtained by the citizens.

6 See, e.g., Finer, Samuel E., Bogdanor, Vernon & Bernard, Rudden, Comparing Constitutions (1995)Google Scholar; Rosenthal, Albert J., Afterward, in Constitutionalism and Rights: The Influence of the United States Constitution Abroad (Henkin, L. & Rosenthal, A.J. eds., 1990)Google Scholar; Freedom of Speech and Incitement Against Democracy (Kretzmer, David & Hazan, Francine Kershman, eds. 2000)Google Scholar.

7 Donnelly, Jack, International Human Rights (1998)Google Scholar.

8 Kremnitzer, Mordechai, The Justification of Freedom of Speech, in 2 Human Rights and Civil Liberties in Israel—A Reader 28 (Gavison, Ruth & Shneidor, H. ed., 1991) [in Hebrew]Google Scholar; Kremnitzer, Mordechai, The High Court of Justice and the Shaping of Public Policy: Equality between the Sexes, in Public Policy in Israel 175 (Nahmias, D. & Menahem, G. eds., 1999) [in Hebrew]Google Scholar.

9 Gavison, Ruth, Human Rights, in 1 Human Rights and Civil Liberties in Israel—A Reader 25–34 (Gavison, Ruth & Shneidor, H. eds., 1991) [in Hebrew]Google Scholar.

10 Id; see also, McCann, Michael & Silverstein, Helena, Rethinking Law's “Allurements,” in Cause Layering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities (Sarat, A. & Scheingold, S. eds., 1998)Google Scholar; Gavison, Ruth, Kremnitzer, Mordechai, & Dotan, Yoav, Judicial Activism: For and Against: The Role of the High Court of Justice in Israeli Society (2000) [in Hebrew]Google Scholar.

11 For examples regarding the international distribution of norms as well as on the mechanisms according to which these norms spread see Finnemore, Martha, National Interests in International Society (1996)Google Scholar; Finnemore, Martha, Norms, Culture and World Politics: Insights from Sociology's Institutionalism, 50 Int'l Org. 325 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Finnemore, Martha & Sikkink, Kathryn, Norms and International Relations Theory, 52 Int'l Org. 887 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jepperson, Ronald L., Wendt, Alexander & Katzenstein, Peter, Norms, Identity and Culture in National Security, in The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (Katzenstein, P.J. ed., 1996) Google Scholar; Cultural, Norms and National Security, Police and Military in Postwar Japan (Katzenstein, Peter ed., 1996)Google Scholar; Klotz, Audie, Norms in International Relations: The Struggle Against Apartheid (1995)Google Scholar; Kowert, Paul & Legro, Jeffrey, Norms, Identity and Their Limits: A Theoretical Reprise, in The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (Katzenstein, P. J. ed., 1996)Google Scholar; Yee, Albert S., The Causal Effects of Ideas on Polices, 50 Int'l Org. 69 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Checkel, Jeffrey, The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory, 50 World Pol. 324 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Risse-Kappen, Thomas, Ideas do not Float Freely: Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War, 48 Int'l Org. 185 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; The Welfare State, Globalization, and International Law (Benvenisti, Eyal & Nolte, Georg eds., 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Jochnick, Chris, Confronting the Impunity of Non-State Actors: New Fields for the Promotion of Human Rights, 21 Hum. Rts. Q. 56 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 See, e.g., Risse, Ropp & Sikkink, supra note 2.

14 Keith, supra note 2; Poe, Steven & Tate, Neal, Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s: A Global Analysis, 88(4) Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 853 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zanger, Sabine, A Global Analysis of the Effect of Political Regime Changes on Life Integrity Violations, 1977-93, 37(2) J. Peace Res. 213 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Murphy, Walter, Constitutions, Constitutionalism and Democracy, in Constitutionalism, and Democracy: Transitions in the Contemporary World (Greenberg, D., Katz, S.N., Oliviero, M.B. & Wheatley, S. C. eds., 1993)Google Scholar; Ludwikowski, Rett R., Constitution Making in the Region of Former Soviet Dominance (1996)Google Scholar; Davenport, Christian, Constitutional Promises and Repressive Reality: A Cross National Time Series Investigation of Why Political and Civil Liberties are Suppressed, 58(3) J. Pol. 627 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cross, Frank, The Relevance of Law in Human Rights Protection, 19 Int'l Rev. L. & Econ. 87 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Camiel, supra note 2; White, Richard, The Nationalization of Nature, 86(3) J. Am. Hist. 976–86 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Camiel, id.

18 Epp, Charles R., The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective (1998)Google Scholar.

19 Epstein, Lee & Kobylka, Joseph F., The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty (1992)Google Scholar; Hall, Kermit L., The Magic Mirror: Law in American History (1989)Google Scholar; Klarman, Michael, Rethinking the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Revolution, 82 Va. L. Rev. 1–67 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McCloseky, Robert J., The American Supreme Court (2d ed. 1994)Google Scholar.

20 See, e.g., Rosenberg, Gerald N., The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? (1991)Google Scholar.

21 Mueller, Dennis, Public Choice II (1989)Google Scholar; Taylor, Michael, The Possibility of Cooperation (1987)Google Scholar; Von Neumann, John & Morgenstern, Oscar, The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1947)Google Scholar; Hargreaves-Heap, Shaun & Varoufakis, Yanis, Game Theory—A Critical Introduction (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy (1957)Google Scholar.

23 Weimer, David & Vining, Aidan, Policy Analysis (1999)Google Scholar.

24 Id.

25 Olson, Macur, The Logic of Collective Action (1965)Google Scholar; Taylor, Michael, The Possibilit Y of Cooperation (1987)Google Scholar; Axelrod, Robert, The Evolution of Cooperation (1984)Google Scholar.

26 Chong, Dennis, Collective Action and the Civil Right Movement (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Weimer & Vining, supra note 23.

28 Niskanen, William, Bureaucracy and Representative Government (1971)Google Scholar; for a review of Formal Models of Bureaucracy see Bendor, Jonathan, Formal Models of Bureaucracy: A Review, in Public Administration: The State of the Discipline (Lynn, N.B. & Wildavsky, A. eds., 1990)Google Scholar; Mitchell, William & Munger, Michael, Economic Models of Interest Groups: An Introductory Survey, 35 Am. J. Pol. Sci. 512 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Peltzman, Sam, Toward a More General Theory of Regulation, 19 J.L. & Eco. 211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Unger, Roberto, Knowledge and Politics (1975)Google Scholar; Mackinon, Catharine, Toward Feminist Jurisprudence, in Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (Mackinon, C.A. ed., 1989)Google Scholar; Hirschl, Ran, The Political Origins of Judicial Empowerment through Constitutionalization: Lessons from Israel's Constitutional Revolution, 33 Comp. Pol. 315 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Schubert, Glendon, Political Culture and Judicial Behavior (1985)Google Scholar; Cowan, Thomas A., Group Interests, 44 Va. L. Rev. 331–345 (1958)Google Scholar.

31 Parsons, Tallcot, The Law and Social Control, in Law & Sociology 56–72 (Evan, William M. ed., 1962)Google Scholar; Nonet, Phillipe, For Jurisprudential Sociology, 10 Law & Soc'Y Rev. 525–45 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Turk, Austin, Law as a Weapon in Social Conflict, 23 Soc. Probs. 276 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 See, e.g., Epstein, Lee & Knight, Jack, The Choices Justices Make (1998)Google Scholar. According to Epstein and Knight justices may be primarily seekers of legal policy but they are not unsophisticated characters who make choices based merely on their own political preferences, instead they are strategic actors who realize that their ability to achieve their goals depends on a consideration of the preferences of others, of the choices they expect others to make and of the institutional context in which they act; Gely, Rafael & Spiller, Pablo, A Rational Choice Theory of Supreme Court Statutory Decisions with Applications to the State Farm and Grove City Cases, 6 J.L. Econ. & Org. 263 (1990)Google Scholar. Gely and Spiller provide a microanalytic model of Supreme Court statutory decisions. Their model combines the rational choice modeling strategy with the notion that institutions matter in the design of public policy; for an attitudinal model see Segal, Jeffrey, Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts, 91 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 28 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. According to the attitudinalists the rules and structures of the U.S. political system allow the justices to vote sincerely; Supreme Court Decision Making, New Institutionalist Approaches (Clayton, Cornell & Gillman, Howard eds., 1999)Google Scholar; Baum, Lawrence, The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior (1997)Google Scholar.

34 Marks, Brian, A Model of Judicial Influence on Congressional Policymaking: Grove City College v. Bell 87–88 (working papers in Political Science, 1988)Google Scholar; Segal, id; Voight, Stefan & Eli Salzberger, Choosing Not to Choose: When Politicians Choose to Delegate Powers, 55 Kyklos 289 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Mautner, Menachem, Law and Culture in Israel: The 1950s and the 1980s, in The History of Law in a Multi-Cultural Society: Israel 1917–1967 (Harris, R., Kedar, A., Lahav, P. & Likhovski, A. eds., 2002)Google Scholar.

36 Id., at 201.

37 Edelman, Martin, The Judicial Elite of Israel, 13 Int'l Pol. Sci. Rev. 235–248 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shafir, Gershon & Peled, Yoav, Being Israeli: The Dynamics of Multiple Citizenship (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Avnon, Dan, The Israeli Basic Laws (Potentially) Fatal Flaw, 32 Is. L.R. 535 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Rosenberg, supra note 20.

39 Barzilai, Gad, Justices as a Policy-Makers, in Public Policy in Israel: Perspectives and Practices 71 (Korn, D. ed., 2002)Google Scholar.

40 See, e.g., H.C.J. 73/53, “Kol Ha'am” Co. Ltd. v. Minister of Interior, 7 P.D. 871, the supreme court stated the right of freedom of expression; H.C.J. 153/87, Shakdiel v. Minister of Religious Affairs, 42(2) P.D. 221, the Supreme Court played a primary role in defending the status of female members of public religious bodies; H.C.J. 5100/94, Pub. Comm. Against Torture in Israel v. the Government of Israel, 53(4) P.D. 817, the Supreme Court declared that Israeli law prohibits physical methods of interrogation.

41 See, e.g., C.A. 6821/93, United Mizrahi Bank Ltd. v. Migdal Coop. Vill., 49 (4) P.D. 21.

42 For a review of the changes that took place in Israel society see mainly Mautner, supra note 35; Barzilai, supra note 1; Barzilai, Gad, Wars, Internal Conflicts and Political Order (1996)Google Scholar; Arian, Asher, The Second Republic: Poliltics in Israel (1998)Google Scholar; Arian, Asher, Politics in Israel: The Second Generation (1985)Google Scholar; Hofhung, Israeli Constitutional Politics, supra note 1; Shamir, Ronen, Landmark Cases and the Reproduction of Legitimacy: The Case of Israel's High Court of Justice, 24 Law & Soc'Y Rev. 781 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shamir, Ronen, Litigation as Consummatory Action: The Instrumental Paradigm Reconsidered, 11 Stud. L. Pol. & Soc'Y 41 (1991)Google Scholar; Horowitz, Dan & Moshe Lissak, Trouble in Utopia (1990)Google Scholar.

43 Mizrahi, Shlomo & Meydani, Assaf, Political Participation via the Judicial System: Exit, Voice, and Quasi-Exit in Israeli Society, 8(2) Isr. Stud. 118 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Horowitz & Lissak, supra note 42.

45 Zalmanovitch, Yair, Transitions in Israel's Policy-Making Network, 555 Annals Am. Acad. Pol. & Soc. Sci. 193–208 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Harris, Michael, Katz, Yitzhak, Doron, Gideon & Woodlief, A., Ideology and Privatization Policy In Israel, 15 Environment and Planning A—Government Policy 363 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Horowitz & Lissak, supra note 42; Arian, supra note 42.

47 Id.

48 Lehman-Wilzig, Sam, Loyalty, Voice and Quasi-Exit, 24 Comp. Pol. 97 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lehman-Wilzio, Sam, Wildfire: Grassroots Revolts in Israel in the Post-Socialist Era (1992)Google Scholar.

49 Bruno, Michael, Crisis, Stabilization and Economic Reform: Therapy by Consensus (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Yogev, Abraham, Order in the Chaos: Israel Education Policy in the Post-Modern Era, in Public Policy in Israel (Nachmias, D. & Menachem, G. eds., 1999) [in Hebrew]Google Scholar; Chernichovsky, Dov, The Economic Dimensions of a Crisis in a Health Care System, and Key Principles and Proposals for reform: the Case of Israel (Unpublished Draft Paper JDC-Brookdale Institute for Human Development and Gerontology, 1991)Google Scholar.

51 Zinger, Roni, This is How We Guard Our Home, Ha'aretz, August 13, 2004, B2Google Scholar.

52 Gidron, Benjamin, Bar, Michael & Katz, Hagai, The Third Sector in Israel: Between Civil Society and the Welfare State (2003) [in Hebrew]Google Scholar.

53 Lehman-Wilzig, Wildfire, supra note 48.

54 Mizrahi & Meydani, supra note 43.

53 Eldar, Akiva, Thus Buried The Human Rights Governorship in the Minister's Drawer, Ha'aretz, March 27, 2002, B2Google Scholar.

56 H.C.J. 7081/93, Butzer v. Local Authority Macabim-Reut, 50(1) P.D. 19.

57 H.C.J. 6698/95, Ka'adan v. The Israel Lands Administration (ILA), 54(1) P.D. 258.

58 H.C.J. 4330/93, Ganem, v. The Israel Bar, 50 (4) P.D. 221.

59 Eldar, supra note 55.