Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T02:22:47.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sanctions and Rewards in the Legal System. Edited by M.L. Friedland. [University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1989, 224 pp.].

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2016

Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Books
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 It is common practice for an offender to be required to enter into a recognisance to refrain from further criminal conduct. If he is in breach of his undertaking, he is required to pay the sum specified. This is clearly a suspended sanction. However, the offender (or in the case of Palestinian stone throwers, his parents) may be required to deposit the money which becomes returnable in the event of continued good behaviour for the duration of the period specified. While in substance the two cases are almost indistinguishable, the return of the money in the second case appears to take the form of a reward.