Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-13T19:40:23.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Essays on Oriental Laws of Succession. By J. Brugman and others. Studia, et Documenta ad Iura Orientis Antiqui Pertinentia, Vol. IX. [E. J. Brill, Leiden, 1969, 127 pp., Fl. 36.]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Reuven Yaron
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Books
Information
Israel Law Review , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , April 1971 , pp. 276 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, however, Pestman, at p. 65, on the so-called Codex of Hermopolis, “a collection of juridical instructions from the third century B.C.”; this text still awaits publication.

2 In much later times, this is the rule in Islamic law; see Brugman, p. 90 ff.

3 See my Introduction to the Law of the Aramaic Papyri (1961) 68.

4 The fragment was first published by Weidner, E., (1937) 12 Archiv für Orientforschung 53 ff.Google Scholar; see lastly Cardascia, G., Les lois assyriennes (1969) 336 ff.Google Scholar

5 See Cardascia, op. cit., p. 14.

6 Ulpianus 20.13: …furiosus (testamentum facere non potest) quoniam mentem non habet, ut testari de sua re possit. “…a lunatic (cannot make a will), since he does not have the (proper) mind, that he be able to will his property.”

7 See, within the volume under review, the remarks of Kraus (11 ff.) on the practice in various Babylonian cities and in Mari; see also Pestman (p. 66), on Ptolemaic Egypt.

8 For earlier dissent from the views of David, concerning the contacts between the Bible and the Ancient East, see my Laws of Eshnunna (1969) 193, and especially note 97.

9 Having written this, I took the precaution of consulting my colleague Dr. J. Meron. He concurs.