Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T19:26:14.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Relation between Criminal and Social Justice*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Get access

Extract

Crime has become a major focus of public attention in the United States. Not white collar crime like embezzlement or tax fraud, nor crimes of passion, nor even the organized crime of professional gangsters. The public is gripped by newspaper accounts of crimes which endanger the physical safety of the population: robbery, housebreaking, assault, rape, and murder. Preoccupation with crime pervades every level of discussion; indeed, when Senator Goldwater made “crime in the streets” a major issue in his ill-fated campaign for the Presidency in 1964, he touched upon a nerve that is very raw in many Americans. Today, Truman Capote's In Cold Blood, a remarkable account of an apparently senseless robbery and murder, is storming the best-seller lists in our book stores.

After my sixteen years on the bench, it seems to me that it is usually not difficult to identify the class from which perpetrators of urban crimes of violence come. Almost all of the persons accused of this category of crime come from the bottom of society's barrel. They are the ignorant, the ill-educated, the unemployed, and often the unemployable. In a society which prides itself on opportunity and wealth, they have been brought up in terrible poverty. Few of them have had the advantage of what we call a moral upbringing. Because they lack education and skills, they are virtually excluded from the advantages of our economic and cultural life. Many of them are subjected to the grinding humiliation of racial discrimination. In the big cities, they no longer share the roots and traditions which may make rural poverty bearable. On every side, society holds out promises which, for them, are never kept; symbols of success which, for them, cannot be obtained.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 IV National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement, Report on Lawlessness in Law Enforcement (1931) (Wickersham Report).

2 See Bram v. United States, 168 U.S. 532 (1897); Wan v. United States, 266 U.S. 1 (1924).

3 “Since Chambers v. Florida, 309 U.S. 277, this court has recognized that coercion can be mental as well as physical, and that the blood of the accused is not the only hallmark of an unconstitutional inquisition.” Blackburn v. Alabama, 361 U.S. 199, 206 (1960).

4 Rule 5(a), Fed. R. Crim. Proc.

5 See McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943); Mitchell v. United States, 322 U.S. 65 (1944); Upshaw v. United States, 335 U.S. 410 (1948).

6 Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449 (1957).

7 See Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963); Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962); Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 (1956).

8 378 U.S. 478 (1964).

9 The Code was remitted to the committee for further consideration after a plenary meeting of the A.L.I, in Washington in May.

10 Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee on H. R. 11477, S. 2979, S. 3325 and S. 3355 (July 1958), pp. 40, 78.

11 384 U.S. 436 (1966).

12 384 U.S. at 478–79.

13 384 U.S. at 445.

14 384 U.S. at 457.

15 “All these policies point to one overriding thought: the constitutional foundation underlying the privilege is the respect a government—state or federal—must accord to the dignity and integrity of its citizens.” 384 U.S. at 460.

16 “The accused who does not know his rights and therefore does not make a request may be the person who most needs counsel.” 384 U.S. at 470–71.