Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T10:48:05.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond transparency: the principles of lobbying regulation and the perspective of professional lobbying consultancies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2022

Alberto Bitonti Open the ORCID record for Alberto Bitonti [Opens in a new window]  and
Claudia Mariotti Open the ORCID record for Claudia Mariotti [Opens in a new window]
Alberto Bitonti*
Affiliation:
Università della Svizzera italiana, Via Giuseppe Buffi 13, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
Claudia Mariotti
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Roma Tre, via Gabriello Chiabrera 199, 00145 Rome, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. Email: alberto.bitonti@usi.ch
Get access

Abstract

While various types of lobbying regulation continue to be devised in different political systems in the world, some questions remain relevant from both a scientific and practical point of view. How can we define a lobbying regulation? What are the principles and the practices that should be pursued by a policy of lobbying regulation? And what is the lobbyists' stance on this matter? We propose a wider definition of lobbying regulation, aiming to overcome the traditional exclusive attention to formal pieces of legislation dedicated to lobbyists and lobbying activities. We refer to the philosophies of open government and deliberative democracy to expand the view on the principles of lobbying regulations, pointing out the macro-dimensions that can be encompassed for a more fine-grained understanding of lobbying regulations, considering not only transparency (as commonly done by most analyses thus far), but also the (fair) equality of access of stakeholders to policymaking and the public accountability of policymakers. On the empirical plan, we test our conceptual framework through an analysis of the perspective of the professional lobbying consultancies enrolled in the lobbying register of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, using in-depth semi-structured video interviews to investigate how such specifically relevant players assess lobbying regulation, and what principles and rules/institutional practices are most significant in their view, finding strong support for measures that aim to pursue the other two principles pointed out beyond transparency.

Keywords

Access to policymakinglobbying consultancieslobbying regulationlobbyistpolicymakers' accountabilitytransparency registertransparencyvideo interview
Type
Research Article
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , July 2023 , pp. 143 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Società Italiana di Scienza Politica

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archibald, MM, Ambagtsheer, RC, Casey, MG and Lawless, M (2019) Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, FR, Berry, JM, Hojnacki, M, Kimball, DC and Leech, BL (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitonti, A (2020) Where it all starts: lobbying, democracy and the public interest. Journal of Public Affairs 20, e2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitonti, A and Harris, P (eds) (2017) Lobbying in Europe. Public Affairs and the Lobbying Industry in 28 EU Countries. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bohman, J and Rehg, W (eds) (1997) Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinig, MF, Holcombe, RG and Schwartzstein, L (1993) The regulation of lobbyists. Public Choice 77, 377–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunea, A (2019) Regulating European Union lobbying: in whose interest? Journal of European Public Policy 26, 1579–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunea, A and Gross, V (2019) Regulating lobbying through voluntary transparency clubs: the connoisseurs’ assessment. Evidence from the European Union. Public Administration 97, 797–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capano, G, Lizzi, R and Pritoni, A (2014) Gruppi di interesse e politiche pubbliche nell'Italia della transizione. Oltre il clientelismo e il collateralismo. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 323–344.Google Scholar
Carloni, E and Mazzoni, M (2020) Il cantiere delle lobby. Processi decisionali, consenso, regole. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Chari, R, Murphy, G and Hogan, J (2007) Regulating lobbyists: a comparative analysis of the United States, Canada, Germany and the European Union. The Political Quarterly 78, 422–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chari, R, Hogan, J and Murphy, G (2010) Regulating Lobbying: A Global Comparison. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Chari, R, Hogan, J, Murphy, G and Crepaz, M (2019) Regulating Lobbying: A Global Comparison, 2nd Edn. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, HS (2021) A conjoint experiment of how design features affect evaluations of participatory platforms. Government Information Quarterly 38, 101538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, J, Kaszton, J, Rufer, K and Sucheski, L (2010) State-Level Lobbying and Taxpayers: How Much Do We Really Know? Assessing State Lobbying Disclosure Laws and Accessibility. San Francisco, CA: Pacific Research Institute. Available at https://www.pacificresearch.org/pacific-research-institute-releases-new-study-on-government-to-government-lobbying/.Google Scholar
Crepaz, M (2016) Investigating the robustness of lobbying laws: evidence from the Austrian case. Interest Groups & Advocacy 5, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crepaz, M (2017) Why do we have lobbying rules? Investigating the introduction of lobbying laws in EU and OECD member states. Interest Groups & Advocacy 6, 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crepaz, M (2020) To inform, strategise, collaborate, or compete: what use do lobbyists make of lobby registers? European Political Science Review 12, 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crepaz, M and Chari, R (2018) Assessing the validity and reliability of measurements when evaluating public policy. Journal of Public Policy 38, 275–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, JW and Creswell, JD (2018) Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A (2010) Is transparency the best disinfectant? Journal of Political Philosophy 18, 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasone, C and Lupo, N (2015) Transparency vs. informality in legislative committees: comparing the US house of representatives, the Italian chamber of deputies and the European parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies 21, 342–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filgueiras, F (2016) Transparency and accountability: principles and rules for the construction of publicity. Journal of Public Affairs 16, 192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flavin, P (2015) Lobbying regulations and political equality in the American states. American Politics Research 43, 304–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J (2007) The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice 17, 663–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastil, J (2021) A theoretical model of how digital platforms for public consultation can leverage deliberation to boost democratic legitimacy. Journal of Deliberative Democracy 17, 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, J and Dreger, J (2013) The transparency register: a European vanguard of strong lobby regulation? Interest Groups & Advocacy 2, 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, A and Thompson, DF (2004) Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J (1996) Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpin, DR and Fraussen, B (2017) Conceptualising the policy engagement of interest groups: involvement, access and prominence. European Journal of Political Research 56, 723–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heald, D (2006) Transparency as an Instrumental Value. In Hood, C and Heald, D (eds), Transparency: The Key of Better Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 59–73.Google Scholar
Holman, C and Luneburg, W (2012) Lobbying and transparency: a comparative analysis of regulatory reform. Interest Groups & Advocacy 1, 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holyoke, TT (2017) A theoretical foundation for assessing principal-agent problems in lobbying ethics and an empirical test. Interest Groups & Advocacy 6, 272–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klüver, H, Braun, C and Beyers, J (2015) Legislative lobbying in context: towards a conceptual framework of interest group lobbying in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 22, 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, HD and Kaplan, A (1950) Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lathrop, D and Ruma, L (eds) (2010) Open Government. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.Google Scholar
Liani, S and Martire, F (2017) Pretest. Un Approccio Cognitivo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Likert, R (1932) A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. New York: The Science Press.Google Scholar
Lobe, B and Morgan, DL (2021) Assessing the effectiveness of video-based interviewing: a systematic comparison of video-conferencing based dyadic interviews and focus groups. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 24, 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, D (2013) Lobbying influence: meaning, measurement and missing. Interest Groups & Advocacy 2, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, D and Gray, V (1997) How some rules just don't matter: the regulation of lobbyists. Public Choice 91, 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumi, O (2014) A comparative insight into the status of the lobbying regulation debate in Estonia. Journal of Public Affairs 14, 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzoni, M (2013) Il coverage della parola lobby nei giornali italiani. Una spiegazione alle difficoltà di radicamento della cultura delle lobbies. Problemi dell'informazione XXXVIII, 102–122.Google Scholar
McGrath, C (2008) The development and regulation of lobbying in the new member states of the European Union. Journal of Public Affairs 8, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namey, E, Guest, G, O'Regan, A, Godwin, CL, Taylor, J and Martinez, A (2020) How does mode of qualitative data collection affect data and cost? Findings from a quasi-experimental study. Field Methods 32, 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Năstase, A and Muurmans, C (2018) Regulating lobbying activities in the European Union: a voluntary club perspective. Regulation & Governance 14, 238–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmark, AJ (2005) Measuring state legislative lobbying regulation, 1990–2003. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5, 182–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmark, AJ (2017) Lobbying regulation in the states revisited: what are we trying to measure, and how do we measure it? Interest Groups & Advocacy 6, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noveck, BS (2009) Wiki Government. How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Noveck, BS (2018) Crowdlaw: collective intelligence and lawmaking. Analyse & Kritik 40, 359–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2013) Principles for Transparency and Integrity in Lobbying. Paris: OECD. Available at https://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/oecdprinciplesfortransparencyandintegrityinlobbying.htm).Google Scholar
OECD (2016) Open Government: The Global Context and the Way Forward. Paris: OECD. Available at https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/9789264268104-en.Google Scholar
OECD (2021) Lobbying in the 21st Century. Transparency, Integrity and Access. Paris: OECD. Available at https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/c6d8eff8-en.Google Scholar
Open Government Partnership (2017) Trust: the fight to win it back. Available at www.opengovpartnership.org/trust.Google Scholar
Opheim, C (1991) Explaining the differences in state lobby regulation. The Western Political Quarterly 44, 405–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozymy, J (2010) Assessing the impact of legislative lobbying regulations on interest group influence in U.S. state legislatures. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 10, 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrillo, PL (2019) Teorie e tecniche del lobbying. Regole, casi, procedure. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Pritoni, A (2017) Lobby d'Italia. Il sistema degli interessi tra Prima e Seconda Repubblica. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Pritoni, A and Vicentini, G (2022) Something new on the western front: twenty years of interest group research (1999–2018). Political Studies Review 20, 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920943502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radaelli, CM (2020) Regulatory impact assessment (RIA). In Harris, P, Bitonti, A, Fleisher, CS and Binderkrantz, AS (eds), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_136-1.Google Scholar
RPA (2016) Analysis of responses to the Open Public Consultation on the proposal for a mandatory Transparency Register. Final Report. European Commission. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/summary-report-public-consultation-transparency-register.pdf.Google Scholar
Schoonenboom, J and Johnson, (2017) How to construct a mixed methods research design. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 69(suppl. 2), 107–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, CS (1998) Interest group regulation across the United States: rationale, development and consequences. Parliamentary Affairs 51, 500–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, CS and Hrebenar, RJ (2020) Lobbyist. In Harris, P, Bitonti, A, Fleisher, CS and Binderkrantz, AS (eds), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs. Cham: Springer, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Van Buuren, A, Lewis, JM, Guy Peters, B and Voorberg, W (2020) Improving public policy and administration: exploring the potential of design. Policy & Politics 48, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veksler, A (2015) Diluted regulations-a need to review the theoretical classification of the different lobbying regulatory environments. Journal of Public Affairs 15, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Bitonti and Mariotti supplementary material

Bitonti and Mariotti supplementary material

Download Bitonti and Mariotti supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 2.6 MB