Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T03:20:48.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IL MODELLO SVIZZERO: UN FUTURO PER L'EUROPA?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2018

Introduzione

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Parlar bene della Svizzera non è mai andato di moda. Se all'indomani della seconda guerra mondiale André Siegfried ne scriveva come di una democrazia modello («une démocratie témoin») (Siegfried 1947), molti altri – politici e giornalisti in particolare – l'hanno osteggiata per la sua ricchezza o per il suo neutralismo e, come sostengono alcuni, per il fatto che quella ricchezza poggiava su attività sordide legate allo stesso neutralismo. Senza arrivare a tanto, Harold Wilson, primo ministro britannico negli anni sessanta e settanta, non fu certo l'unico a stigmatizzare gli «gnomi di Zurigo»!

Summary

Summary

The object of this paper is to look at what Switzerland and the European Union have in common and to draw some lessons from their common characteristics. The Author first ascertains what are the major problems which Europe has to face in its move towards integration and compares its problems with those faced by Switzerland. Then he turns to an examination of the nature of the institutional arrangements of the Swiss Confederacy and of those of the European Union to see to what extent they are similar and whether the European Union would gain by modelling its institutions more closely on those of Switzerland. Finally, some other characteristics of the Swiss political life are examined to see whether their introduction might benefit the European Union.

According to the Author, Switzerland can provide guidance to the European Union as well as demonstrate to both sceptics and enthusiasts that in the path towards unity, the cultural and social' diversity of Europe can be protected and has to be protected. To make such a development fully acceptable the Author recognized that, above all, progress towards unity has to be slow, very slow indeed.

Type
Saggi
Copyright
Copyright © Societ Italiana di Scienza Politica 

References

Riferimenti bibliografici

Allemann, F.R. (1985), Vingt-six fois la Suisse, Lausanne, Edition de l'Aire.Google Scholar
Aubert, J.F. (1979), Exposé des institutions politiques de la Suisse à partir de quelques affaires controversées, Lausanne, Payot.Google Scholar
Eschet-Schwarz, A. (1989), The Role of Semi-direct Democracy in Shaping Swiss Federation, in «The Journal of Federalism», XIX, pp. 79106.Google Scholar
Knapp, B. (1987), Conféderation et cantons: l'influence des crises sur l'évolution de leurs relations, in «Pouvoirs», 43, pp. 3147.Google Scholar
Linder, W. (1994), Swiss Democracy, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. (1974), Prefazione a Steiner (1974).Google Scholar
Reif, K. (1985), Ten Second-order National Elections, in Reif, K. (a cura di), Ten European Elections, London, Gower.Google Scholar
Sidjansky, D. (1979), Turnout, Stability and the Left-right Dimension, in Penniman, H.R. (a cura di), Switzerland at the Polls, Washington D.C., Enterprise Institute, pp. 104136.Google Scholar
Sidjansky, D. (a cura di) (1996), L'Union europeénne à l'epreuve du fédéralisme suisse, Genéve.Google Scholar
Siegfried, A. (1947), La Suisse, démocratie témoin, Neuchatel, La Baconnière (Ia ed. 1969).Google Scholar
Steiner, J. (1974), Amicable Agreement versus Majority Rule, Chapel Hill, University of North Caroline Press.Google Scholar
Wheare, K.C. (1966), Federalism, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar