No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Retrospective voting in the Italian 2013 election: a sub-national perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 August 2017
Abstract
The Italian 2013 election ended the period of bipolarism that characterized the so-called ‘Second Republic’, and paved the way for new parties such as the Five Star Movement. We investigate that election, which took place after the technocratic government led by Mario Monti, through the analytical lenses of the retrospective theory of economic voting applied at the provincial level. Local unemployment rates shape the electoral performances of those parties that were more supportive and sympathetic to the caretaker executive, thus confirming a distinction between incumbent and non-incumbent even in that critical and politically undecided election. We further contribute to the literature on retrospective voting by relaxing the locally untenable assumption of independence among the units. Making use of spatial regression models, we demonstrate the relevance of both the internal and contiguous economies, and their relative impact due to the different size of the provinces.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 65 - 83
- Copyright
- © Società Italiana di Scienza Politica 2017
References
Anderson, C.J. and Hecht, J.D. (2012), ‘Voting when the economy goes bad, everyone is in charge, and no one is to blame: the case of the 2009 German election’, Electoral Studies
31(1): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldini, G. (2013), ‘Don’t count your chickens before they’re hatched: the 2013 Italian parliamentary and presidential elections’, South European Society and Politics
18(4): 473–497.Google Scholar
Bellucci, P. (1984), ‘The effect of aggregate economic conditions on the political preferences of the Italian electorate, 1953–1979’, European Journal of Political Research
12(4): 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellucci, P. (2014), ‘The political consequences of blame attribution for the economic crisis in the 2013 Italian national election’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties
24(2): 243–263.Google Scholar
Bordignon, F. and Ceccarini, L. (2013), ‘Five Stars and a Cricket. Beppe Grillo Shakes Italian politics’, South European Society and Politics
18(4): 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, A. (2016), ‘Types of economic voting in regional elections: the 2012 Catalan election as a motivating case’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties
26(1): 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosco, A. and McDonnell, D. (2012), ‘Introduction: the Monti government and the downgrade of Italian parties’, in A. Bosco and D. McDonnell (eds), From Berlusconi to Monti, New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 37–56.Google Scholar
Bosco, A. and Verney, S. (2012), ‘Electoral epidemic: the political cost of economic crisis in Southern Europe, 2010–11’, South European Society and Politics
17(2): 129–154.Google Scholar
Brambor, T., Clark, W.R. and Golder, M. (2006), ‘Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses’, Political Analysis
14(1): 63–82.Google Scholar
Cartocci, R. (2007), ‘Mappe del tesoro’, Atlante del capitale sociale in Italia, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Chiaramonte, A. (2014), ‘The elections of 2013: A tsunami with no winners’, in C. Fusaro and A. Kreppel (eds) Still Waiting for the Transformation, New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 45–63.Google Scholar
Chiaramonte, A. and De Sio, L. (eds) (2014), Terremoto Elettorale: Le Elezioni Politiche del 2013, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Chiaramonte, A. and Emanuele, V. (2014), ‘Bipolarismo addio? Il sistema partitico tra cambiamento e de-istituzionalizzazione’, in A. Chiaramonte and L. De Sio (eds) Terremoto Elettorale: Le Elezioni Politiche del 2013, Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 233–262.Google Scholar
Cutler, F. (2002), ‘Local economies, local policy impacts and federal electoral behaviour in Canada’, Canadian Journal of Political Science
35(2): 347–382.Google Scholar
D’Alimonte, R., Di Virgilio, A. and Maggini, N. (2013), ‘I risultati elettorali: bipolarismo addio?’, in Itanes (ed.), Voto amaro. Disincanto e crisi economica nelle elezioni del 2013, Bologna: il Mulino, pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
Dassonneville, R. and Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2014), ‘Macroeconomics, economic crisis and electoral outcomes: A national European pool’, Acta Politica
49(4): 372–394.Google Scholar
Dassonneville, R., Claes, E. and Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2016), ‘Punishing local incumbents for the local economy: economic voting in the 2012 Belgian municipal elections’, Italian Political Science Review
46(1): 3–22.Google Scholar
Debus, M., Stegmaier, M. and Tosun, J. (2014), ‘Economic voting under coalition governments: evidence from Germany’, Political Science Research and Methods
2(1): 49–67.Google Scholar
Drukker, D.M., Peng, H., Prucha, I.R. and Raciborski, R. (2013), ‘Creating and managing spatial-weighting matrices with the spmat command’, The Stata Journal
13(2): 242–286.Google Scholar
Duch, R.M. and Stevenson, R.T. (2008), The Economic Vote. How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eurobarometer (2012), Standard Eurobarometer 78, Public Opinion in the European Union. First results, Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Fauvelle-Aymar, C. and Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2011), ‘Second-order elections and economic voting: the French regional example’, Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica
41(3): 369–384.Google Scholar
Freire, A., Lisi, M., Andreadis, I. and Viegas, J.M.L. (2014), ‘Political representation in bailed-out southern Europe: Greece and Portugal compared’, South European Society and Politics
19(4): 413–433.Google Scholar
Giannetti, D. (2013), ‘Mario Monti’s technocratic Government’, in A. Di Virgilio and C.M. Radaelli (eds), Technocrats in Office, New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 133–152.Google Scholar
Giuliani, M. and Massari, S.A. (2017), ‘The economic vote at the party level: electoral behaviour during the Great Recession’, Party politics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Giuliani, M. and Massari, S.A. (2018), It’s the Economy, Stupid. Votare in tempo di crisi, Bologna: il Mulino, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Itanes (2013), Voto amaro. Disincanto e crisi economica nelle elezioni del 2013, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Johnston, R.J. and Pattie, C.J. (2001), ‘“It’s the economy, stupid” – but which economy? Geographical scales, retrospective economic evaluations and voting at the 1997 British general election’, Regional Studies
35(4): 309–319.Google Scholar
Johnston, R., Pattie, C., Dorling, D., MacAllister, I., Tunstall, H. and Rossiter, D. (2000), ‘Local context, retrospective economic evaluations, and voting: the 1997 general election in England and Wales’, Political Behavior
22(2): 121–143.Google Scholar
Kam, C.D. and Franzese, R.J. (2007), Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Karyotis, G. and Rüdig, W. (2015), ‘Blame and punishment? The electoral politics of extreme austerity in Greece’, Political Studies
63(1): 2–24.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M.S. and Nadeau, R. (2012), ‘PIGS or not? Economic voting in Southern Europe’, Electoral Studies
31(3): 472–477.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M.S. and Stegmaier, M. (2013), ‘The VP-function revisited: a survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after over 40 years’, Public Choice
157(3/4): 367–385.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M.S. and Costa Lobo, M. (2017), ‘The economic vote: ordinary vs. extraordinary times’, in K. Arzheimer, J. Evans and M.S. Lewis-Beck (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Electoral Behaviour, Vol. 2 London: Sage Publications, pp. 606–629.Google Scholar
Martins, R. and Veiga, F.J. (2013), ‘Economic voting in Portuguese municipal elections’, Public Choice
155(3): 317–334.Google Scholar
McDonnell, D. and Valbruzzi, M. (2014), ‘Defining and classifying technocrat-led and technocratic governments’, European Journal of Political Research
53(4): 654–671.Google Scholar
Neumayer, E. and Plümper, T. (2010), ‘Making spatial analysis operational: commands for generating spatial-effect variables in monadic and dyadic data’, The Stata Journal
10(4): 1–21.Google Scholar
Neumayer, E. and Plümper, T. (2016), ‘W’, Political Science Research and Methods
4(1): 175–193.Google Scholar
Passarelli, G. and Tuorto, D. (2014), ‘Not with my vote: turnout and the economic crisis in Italy’, Contemporary Italian Politics
6(2): 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedrazzani, A. and Pinto, L. (2013), ‘The work of parliament in the year of the technocratic government’, in A. Di Virgilio and C.M. Radaelli (eds), Technocrats in Office, New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 153–172.Google Scholar
Pisati, M. (2014), ‘The A to Z of how to create thematic maps of Italy using spmap’. Italian Stata Users Group Meeting, November 13-14, Milano. Retrieved 15 August 2017 from http://www.stata.com/meeting/italy14/abstracts/materials/it14_pisati.pdf.Google Scholar
Plescia, C. (2017), ‘Portfolio-specific accountability and retrospective voting: the case of Italy’. Italian Political Science Review https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2017.11.Google Scholar
Regonini, G. and Giuliani, M. (1994), ‘Italie: au delà d’une démocratie consensuelle?’, in B. Jobert (ed.), Le tournant néo-libéral en Europe: Idées, recettes et pratiques gouvernementales, Paris: Harmattan, pp. 123–199.Google Scholar
Riera, P. and Russo, L. (2016), ‘Breaking the cartel: the geography of the electoral support of new parties in Italy and Spain’, Italian Political Science Review
46(2): 219–241.Google Scholar
Rogers, J. (2014), ‘A communotropic theory of economic voting’, Electoral Studies
36: 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vegetti, F., Poletti, M. and Segatti, P. (2014), ‘Availability or disengagement? How Italian citizens reacted to the two-faces parliamentary grand coalition supporting the Monti government?’, Polis-πóλις
28(1): 61–84.Google Scholar
Wilkin, S., Haller, B. and Norpoth, H. (1997), ‘From Argentina to Zambia: a world-wide test of economic voting’, Electoral Studies
16(3): 301–316.Google Scholar
Giuliani supplementary material
Tables A1-A5 and Figures A1-A2
File
46.7 KB