Last updated 10th July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 June 2011
In their impressive new study on British imperialism, Cain and Hopkins mention ‘the desultory negotiations sharing out the Dutch and Portuguese empires should they collapse’ between Britain and Germany at the turn of the century. In the corresponding note, however, they substantiate only the well known negotiations on the Portuguese empire and not those mysterious talks on the Dutch empire. It is one of only a few instances where Cain's and Hopkins’ 2,500 well-documented footnotes do not fully explain their 850 pages of thick description and analysis. Their suggestion of an Anglo-German understanding to divide the Dutch East Indies if necessary, however, does strike some raw nerves among Dutch contemporaries. In the official and unofficial minds of Dutch imperialism, there was a strong fear that die Netherlands could lose their large colonial empire to the great powers. In that case the Netherlands would be reduced to the ‘rank of Denmark’, to a ‘farm at the North Sea’. But this imperial fear was connected with the high hopes that the Netherlands could indeed become the ‘first among the nations of the second rank’, a real middle power, because of its vast colonial empire.
1 Cain, P.J. and Hopkins, A.G., British Imperialism I. Innovation and Expansion 1688–1914; II. Crisis and Deconstruction 1914–1900 (London and New York 1993)Google Scholar. See for the Anglo-American talks about a division of the Dutch East Indies, volume one, 462.
2 de Valk, J.P. and van Faasen, M. (eds.), Dagboeken en aantekeningen van Willem Hendrik de Beaufort 1874–1918 I (The Hague 1993) 237.Google Scholar
3 See for a collection of the most important essays of Robinson, R. and Gallagher, J., Louis, W. Roger (ed.), Imperialism. The Robinson and Gallagher Controversy (New York and London 1976)Google Scholar. C.f. Fieldhouse, D.K., Economics and Empire 1830–1914 (Ithaca 1973).Google Scholar
4 Cain and Hopkins, British Imperialism I, 422.
5 Ibidem, 349. Cf. for the ‘Great Game’, Gillard, D., The Struggle for Asia 1828–1914 (London 1977).Google Scholar
6 Rothermund, D., An economic History of India. From Pre-Colonial Times to 1991 (London 1993) 32–37.Google Scholar
7 Cain and Hopkins, British Imperialism I, 369.
8 Cf. Wesseling, H.L., Verdeel en Heers. De deling van Afrika 1880–1914 (Amsterdam 1991) 234–237Google Scholar, 359–385; The Pakenham, The Scramble for Africa 1876–1912 (London 1991) ch. 29.Google Scholar
9 Cain and Hopkins, British Imperialism I, 408.
10 Fieldhouse, D.K., ‘“Imperialism”: A Historiographical Revision’, Economic History Review 2nd series 14 (1961) 194.Google Scholar
11 Cain and Hopkins, British Imperialism I, 313–314.
12 Ibidem, 57. Cf. Bayly, C.A., Imperial Meridian. The British Empire and the World, 1780–1830 (Cambridge 1989) 258–267.Google Scholar
13 Cain and Hopkins, British Imperialism II, ch. 11. Cf. Holland, R.F., European Decolonization 1918–1981: An Introductory Survey (London 1985) 191–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Darwin, J., Britain and Decolonization. The Retreat from Empire in the Post-War World (London 1988) 211–214, 226–232.Google Scholar
14 Cain and Hopkins, British Imperialism II, 261.
15 Ibidem, 297.
16 Cf. Kuitenbrouwer, M., The Netherlands and the Rise of Modem Imperialism. Colonies and Foreign Policy 1870–1902 (Oxford 1991) 18–21.Google Scholar
17 van Thijn, Th., ‘Een nabeschouwing’, Bijdragen en Mededelingen betreffende de Geschiedenis der Nederlanden 86 (1971) 79–90Google Scholar. The subject of the congress of the Dutch Historical Association was still prudently phrased as ‘The Dutch Expansion in Indonesia in the Period of Modern Imperialism 1870–1914’.
18 Locher-Scholten, E.B., Elhieh in fragmenten. Vijf studies over koloniaal denken en doen van Nederlanden in de Indonesische archipel (Utrecht 1981) 194–200.Google Scholar
19 van Goor, J. (ed.), Imperialisms in de marge. De afronding van Nederland-Indië (Utrecht 1985)Google Scholar. Cf. Kuitenbrouwer, M., Nederland en de opkomst van hel modeme imperialisme. Koloniën en buitenlandse politick 1870–1902 (Amsterdam 1985)Google Scholar; see for the translation note 16 above.
20 Wesseling, H.L., ‘Bestond er een Nederlands imperialisme?’, Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis 90 (1986) 214–225Google Scholar. This review-article was published in modified form in the Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 16 (1988) 57–70.Google Scholar
21 Wesseling, H.L., ‘British and Dutch Imperialism: A Comparison’, Itinerario 13 (1989) 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 See for my belated reaction to Wesselings criticisms, Kuitenbrouwer, M., ‘Het imperialisme van een kleine mogendheid: de overzeese expansie van Nederland 1870–1914’ in: van Sas, N.C.F. (ed.), De Kracht van Nederland. Internationale positie en builenlands beleid (Haarlem 1991) 61–64.Google Scholar
23 van der Wai, S.L., ‘De Nederlandse expansie in Indonesiē in de tijd van het moderne imperialisme: de houding van de Nederlandse regering en de politieke partijen’, BMGN 86 (1971) 47–55.Google Scholar
24 Fasseur, C., ‘Een koloniale paradox. De Nederlandse expansie in de Indonesische archipel in het midden van de negentiende eeuw (1830–1870)’, TvG (1979) 162–187.Google Scholar
25 de Moor, J.A., ‘Warmakers in the Archipelago: Dutch Expeditions in Nineteenth Century Indonesia’ in: de Moor, H.J. and Wesseling, H.L. (eds.), Imperialism and War. Essays on Colonial Wars in Asia and Africa (Leiden 1989) 50–72.Google Scholar
26 Locher-Scholten, E.B., Sumatraans sultanaat en kolonialestaat. De relatie Djambi-Batavia (1830–1907) en het Nederlandse imperialisme (Leiden 1994).Google Scholar
27 Ibidem, 275.
28 See for the Dutch colonial mind in particular, Fasseur, C., De geest van het gouvernement (Leiden 1977)Google Scholar and idem, De Indologen, Ambtenaren voor de Oost 1825–1950 (Amsterdam 1993).
29 See the private papers of C.H.A. van der Wijck (National Archives, The Hague).
30 Lindblad, J. Th., ‘Economic Aspects of the Dutch Expansion in Indonesia, 1870–1914’, Modern Asian Studies 23 (1989) 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, Between Dayak and Dutch. The Economic. History of Southeast Kalimantan 1880–1942 (Dordrecht 1988)Google Scholar; idem with Clemens, A.H.P. (eds.), Het belong van de Buitengewesten. Economische expansie en koloniale staatsvorming in de Buitengewesten van Nederlands-Indiē 1870–1942 (Amsterdam 1989).Google Scholar
31 à Campo, J.N.F.M., Koninklijke Paketvaart Maatschappij. Stoomvaart en slaatsvorming in de Indonesische archipel 1888–1914 (Hilversum 1992).Google Scholar
32 Ibidem, chapter 1. Cf. Kuitenbrouwer, Netherlands, 183, 188, 217, 250.
33 Cain, P.J. and Hopkins, A.G., ‘The Political Economy of British Expansion Overseas, 1750–1914’, Economic History Review 2nd series 33 (1980) 463–491Google Scholar. Cf. Wesseling. ‘Nederlands imperialisme’, 223.
34 Kuitenbrouwer, Netherlands, 354–355. Cf. idem, ‘From Colonialism to Imperialism: Dutch Overseas Expansion, 1870–1914’ in: Groenveld, S. and Wintle, M. (eds.), Britain and the Netherlands X. Government and Economy in Britain and the Netherlands since the Middle Ages (Zutphen 1992) 118–119.Google Scholar
35 Maddison, A., ‘Dutch Income in and from Indonesia, 1700–1938’ in: Maddison, A. and Prince, G. (eds.), Economic Growth in Indonesia 1820–1940 (Dordrecht and Providence 1989) 1543Google Scholar. Cf. Kuitenbrouwer, Netherlands, 279–280, 348, 374; Lindblad, ‘Economic Aspects’.
36 Griffiths, R.T., ‘The Creation of a National Dutch Economy: 1795–1909’, TvG 95 (1982) 531Google Scholar. Cf. Smits, J.P., ‘The Size and Structure of the Dutch Service Sector in International Perspective, 1850–1914’, Economic and Social History in the Netherlands 2 (1990) 81–99.Google Scholar
37 Schijf, H., Netwerken van een financieel-economische elite. Personele verbindingen in het Nederlandse bedrijfsleven aan het einde van de negentiende eeuw (Amsterdam 1993) 207–224.Google Scholar
38 P.P. van Bosse to J. Loudon, 23th October 1871. Loudon Collection (National Archives, The Hague).
39 Handelingen Tweede Kamer, 22 maart 1886, 1254.
40 Verslag van de Kamer van Koophandel Amsterdam 1890, 8.
41 Lindblad, J. Th., ‘Ondernemen in Nederlands-Indië c. 1900–1940’, BMGN 108 (1993) 699–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42 Sandberg, C.G.S., Indië verloren, rampspoed geboren (The Hague 1914).Google Scholar
