Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T05:53:25.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Statistical Table as Colonial Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2017

Tim Rowse
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The statistical table is one expression of the settler colonial capacity and willingness to enumerate colonized “peoples” as “populations.” By examining four tables—from 1763, 1828, 1848, and 1850—in Canada, New Zealand, and Australia this paper illustrates the emergence of this powerful technique of representation during the same a period in which European states were developing their capacity to represent the social in statistical terms. In the colonial context, the rise of the notion of a “population” whose characteristics could be averaged contributed to the specifically administrative eclipse of native sovereignty, paralleling the jural/political demise of native sovereignty.

Keywords

colonial knowledgestatisticspopulationsovereigntymodernity
Type
Articles
Information
Itinerario , Volume 41 , Special Issue 1: Knowledge Brokers and Knowledge Production in Colonial Orders , April 2017 , pp. 51 - 73
Copyright
© 2017 Research Institute for History, Leiden University 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Tim Rowse is a Professor Emeritus in the Institute of Culture and Society (Western Sydney University) and a School Visitor in the Research School of Social Sciences (The Australian National University). He has been studying settler colonial history (mainly Australian) since the early 1980s. His most recent book is Rethinking Social Justice: From “Peoples” To “Populations” (Aboriginal Studies Press 2012); with Lisa Ford he edited Between Indigenous and Settler Governance (Routledge 2012).

References

Bibliography

Published primary sources Google Scholar
British Parliamentary PapersGoogle Scholar
Aborigines. Vol. 3, Correspondence and Other Papers Relating to Aboriginal Tribes in British Possessions.Google Scholar
- “Instructions to Major-General Darling, for the purposes of inquiring into the exact state of the Indian Department, and the practicability of carrying into effect the object expressed in the Despatch of Lord Goderich, of 14 July 1827” (9 June 1828), 31.Google Scholar
- Extract of a Despatch from Lord Dalhousie to Mr. Secretary Huskisson 22 November 1827, 5–6.Google Scholar
- Major-General Darling’s report on the Indian Department (24 July 1828). Enclosure in Lord Dalhousie to Sir George Murray 27 October 1828, 22–31.Google Scholar
- Copy of a Despatch from Lord Goderich to Earl Dalhousie 14 July 1827, 5.Google Scholar
New Zealand. Vol. 5, Correspondence and Papers Relating to New Zealand, 1846–1847.Google Scholar
-George Clarke letter 30 March 1846 (Enclosure in George Grey to Stanley 12 June 1846), 17.Google Scholar
New Zealand. Vol. 6, Correspondence and Papers Relating to New Zealand, 1847–1850.Google Scholar
- Grey to Grey 10 February 1849, 71.Google Scholar
A Compendium of Official Documents Relative to Native Affairs in the South Island, compiled by Alexander Mackay. Wellington: Government Printer, 1873.Google Scholar
- Lieutenant-Governor Eyre to Mr. Kemp, 13 June 1850, 229.Google Scholar
- Tiramorehu to E. J. Eyre, 22 October 1849, 227–28.Google Scholar
- Mr Mantell to the Hon. The Colonial Secretary, 30 January 1849, 216–219.Google Scholar
Documents Relating to the Constitutional History of Canada 1791–1818, selected and edited with notes by A. G. Doughty and D. A. McArthur. Ottawa: C. H. Parmelee, 1914.Google Scholar
- James Simcoe to Dorchester, 29 March 1795, 176–82.Google Scholar
Documents Relative to the Colonial History of the State of New York, edited by E. B. O’Callaghan and B. Fernow. 15 vols. Albany: Weed, Parsons, 1853–87.Google Scholar
- William Johnson to the Lords of Trade, 13 November 1763, vol. 7, 572–84.Google Scholar
- William Johnson to Lords to Trade, 8 October 1764, vol. 8, 657–58.Google Scholar
Historical Records of Victoria. Vol. 2B, Aborigines and Protectors 1838-1839, edited by Michael Cannon.Google Scholar
- G. A. Robinson to C. J. La Trobe, 23 December 1839, 488.Google Scholar
- G. A. Robinson to Assistant Protectors, 22 August 1839, 476.Google Scholar
New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council. Select Committee on the Aborigines and Protectorate.Google Scholar
Votes and Proceedings of the Legislative Council . . . 1849. Vol. 2. Sydney: 1849.Google Scholar
-“Aborigines and Protectorate: Report from the Select Committee on the Aborigines and Protectorate, with appendix, minutes of evidence, and replies to a circular letter.”.Google Scholar
New South Wales (Aborigines): Return to an Address, Dr. Thomson, 29th August, 1843, laid upon the table 12th October, 1843. [Sydney: The Legislative Council, 1843.]Google Scholar
Parker, Edward Stone. The Aborigines of Australia: A Lecture Delivered in the Mechanics’ Hall Melbourne, before the John Knox Young Men’s Association, on Wednesday May 10, 1854. Melbourne: Hugh McColl, 1854.Google Scholar
Public Record Office of Victoria.Google Scholar
- Edward Stone Parker to George Augustus Robinson 7 January 1850, Remarks following Half-year Report of Proceedings for period ending 31/12/1849. Edward Parker (Assistant Protector, North Western District). VPRS 4467, Unit 2.Google Scholar
Shortland, Edward. The Southern Districts of New Zealand. London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, 1851.Google Scholar

Secondary sources

Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso, 2006.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal. “Ethnographic Representations, Statistics and Modern Power.” Social Research 61:1 (1994): 55–88.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, Tony. “Empire Knowledge and Culture: From Proto-Globalization to Modern Globalization.” In Globalization in World History, edited by A. G. Hopkins, 115–140. London: Pimlico, 2002.Google Scholar
Banner, Stuart. Possessing the Pacific: Land, Settlers and Indigenous People from Australia to Alaska. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren. Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, Alain. “An Equitable Right to be Compensated: The Dispossession of the Aboriginal Peoples of Quebec and the Emergence of a New Legal Rationale (1760–1860).” Canadian Historical Review 94:1 (2013): 1–27.Google Scholar
Belmessous, Saliha, ed. Empire by Treaty: Negotiating European Expansion, 1600–1900. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Christie, Michael. Aborigines in Colonial Victoria, 1835–1886. Sydney: Sydney University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Connor, T. M. Protector Edward Stone Parker: Port Phillip Gentleman. Melbourne: Uniting Church Historical Society (Victoria) Synod lecture, 1991.Google Scholar
Cullen, M. J. The Statistical Movement in Early Victorian Britain: The Foundations of Empirical Social Research. New York: Harvester Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Desrosières, Alain. “How to Make Things Which Hold Together: Social Science, Statistics and the State.” In Discourses on Society: The Shaping of the Social Science Disciplines, edited by P. Wagner, B. Wittrock and R. Whitley, 195–218. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.Google Scholar
Dickason, Olive Patricia. Canada’s First Nations: A History of Founding Peoples from Earliest Times. 3rd ed. Don Mills: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Eastwood, D. “Amplifying the Province of the Legislature: The Flow of Information and the English State in the Early Nineteenth Century.” Historical Research 62 (1989): 276–294.Google Scholar
Eastwood, D.. “Men, Morals and the Machinery of Social Legislation, 1790–1840.” Parliamentary History 13 (1994): 190–205.Google Scholar
Evison, Harry C. Te Wai Pounamu: The Greenstone Island—A History of the Southern Maori during the European Colonization of New Zealand. Wellington: Aoraki Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Ford, Lisa. Settler Sovereignty: Jurisdiction and Indigenous People in America and Australia, 1788–1836. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Foxcroft, E. J. B. Australian Native Policy: Its History especially in Victoria. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Goldman, Lawrence. “The Origins of British Social Science: Political Economy, Natural Science and Statistics.” Historical Journal 26 (1983): 587–616.Google Scholar
Goldman, Lawrence. “Statistics and the Science of Society in Early Victorian Britain: An Intellectual Context for the General Register Office.” Social History of Medicine 4:3 (1991): 415–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hacking, Ian. Historical Ontology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Hall, A. J. The Red Man’s Burden: Land, Law and the Lord in the Indian Affairs of Upper Canada, 1791–1858. PhD diss., University of Toronto, 1984.Google Scholar
Harris, R. Cole. The Reluctant Land: Society, Space, and Environment in Canada before Confederation. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Hickford, Mark. Lords of the Land: Indigenous Property Rights and the Jurisprudence of Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Hilts, V. L. “ Aliis Exterendum, or the Origins of the Statistical Society of London.” Isis 69 (1978): 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, John. “The Bagot Commission: Developing a Corporate Memory for the Indian Department.” Historical Papers/Communications historiques 17 (1982): 31–52.Google Scholar
McCormick, Ted. “Political Arithmetic’s 18th Century Histories: Quantification in Politics, Religion, and the Public Sphere.” History Compass 12:3 (2014): 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, Charles S. “Consigning the Twentieth Century to History: Alternative Narratives for the Modern Era.” American Historical Review 105:3 (June 2000): 807–831.Google Scholar
Miller, Cary. “Gifts as Treaties: The Political Use of Received Gifts in Anishinaabeg Communities, 1820–1832.” American Indian Quarterly 26:2 (Spring 2002): 221–245.Google Scholar
Morrison, Edgar. Early Days in the Loddon Valley: Memoirs of Edward Stone Parker 1802–1865. Daylesford: n.p., [1966].Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore. The Rise of Statistical Thinking: 1820–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Rowse, Tim. “Official Statistics and the Contemporary Politics of Indigeneity.” Australian Journal of Political Science 44:2 (June 2009): 193–211.Google Scholar
Rowse, Tim. “The Ontological Politics of Closing the Gaps.” Journal of Cultural Economy 2:1–2 (March 2009): 33–48. Reprinted in Assembling Culture. Edited by Tony Bennett and Chris Healy, 30–45. London: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Rowse, Tim. “Population Knowledge and the Practice of Guardianship.” American Nineteenth Century History 15:1 (2014): 15–42.Google Scholar
Rowse, Tim. “‘Rooted in Demographic Reality’: The Contribution of New World Censuses to Indigenous Survival.” History and Anthropology 25:2 (2014): 246–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowse, Tim and Shellam, Tiffany. “The Colonial Emergence of a Statistical Imaginary.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 55:4 (October 2013): 922–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Duncan. “Indian Affairs, 1763–1841.” In Canada and its Provinces, edited by Adam Shortt and Arthur G. Doughty, vol. 4, 695–728. Toronto: Publishers’ Association of Canada, 1913.Google Scholar
Scott, James. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Sosin, Jack M. Whitehall and the Wilderness: The Middle West in British Colonial Policy, 1760–1775. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1961.Google Scholar
White, Richard. The Middle Ground: Indians, Empires, and Republics in the Great Lakes Region, 1650–1815. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar