Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T09:19:25.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Do pandemics reduce support for democracy? A survey experiment in Myanmar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2024

Swe Oo Mon
Affiliation:
Graduate School of International Relations, International University of Japan, Minamiuonuma, Japan
Kyohei Yamada*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of International Relations, International University of Japan, Minamiuonuma, Japan
*
Corresponding author: Kyohei Yamada; Email: kyamada@iuj.ac.jp

Abstract

This paper focuses on people's attitudes towards democracy and authoritarian regimes in Myanmar and whether the extent to which they prefer democracy is moderated by the severity of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. If people view the authoritarian regime's capacity to take swift action favourably, their opposition to it may be lower. We explored this hypothesis by conducting a survey of 756 individuals in Myanmar in June 2022 that incorporated a vignette experiment. A hypothetical scenario of Myanmar society in 2023 was presented with a two-by-two design – the conditions of the government (election is restored or not) and the pandemic situation (good or bad) were randomly varied, and the respondents were asked to report their favourability of the hypothetical scenario. The results reveal: (1) regardless of the pandemic condition, respondents prefer democracy to authoritarian regimes by a wide margin; and (2) the extent to which democracy is preferred is lower when the COVID-19 condition is more severe. Similar results were obtained from supplementary analyses using a conjoint experiment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, CH and Bartels, LM (2004) Blind retrospection: Electoral responses to drought, flu, and shark attacks. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Annaka, S (2021) Political regime, data transparency, and COVID-19 death cases. SSM-Population Health 15, 100832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Annaka, S (2022) Good democratic governance can combat COVID-19 excess mortality analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 83, 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baccini, L, Brodeur, A and Weymouth, S (2021) The COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 US presidential election. Journal of Population Economics 34, 739767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennouna, C, Giraudy, A, Moncada, E, Rios, E, Snyder, R and Testa, P (2021) Pandemic policymaking in presidential federations: explaining subnational responses to Covid-19 in Brazil, Mexico, and the United States. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 51, 570600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, JP, Miller, DC and Schafer, WD (1999) Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 125, 367383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassan, G and Van Steenvoort, M (2021) Political regime and COVID 19 death rate: efficient, biasing or simply different autocracies? An econometric analysis. SSM-Population Health 16, 100912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cato, S, Iida, T, Ishida, K, Ito, A, McElwain, KM and Shoji, M (2020) Social distancing as a public good under the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health 188, 5153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheibub, JA, Hong, JYJ and Przeworski, A (2020) Rights and deaths: government reactions to the pandemic. Available at SSRN 3645410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choutagunta, A, Manish, GP and Rajagopalan, S (2021) Battling COVID-19 with dysfunctional federalism: lessons from India. Southern Economic Journal 87, 12671299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawson, C (2023) Gender differences in optimism, loss aversion and attitudes towards risk. British Journal of Psychology 114, 928944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edgell, AB, Lachapelle, J, Lührmann, A and Maerz, SF (2021) Pandemic backsliding: violations of democratic standards during Covid-19. Social Science & Medicine 285, 114244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engler, S, Brunner, P, Loviat, R, Abou-Chadi, T, Leemann, L, Glaser, A and Kübler, D (2021) Democracy in times of the pandemic: explaining the variation of COVID-19 policies across European democracies. West European Politics 44, 10771102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filsinger, M and Freitag, M (2022) Pandemic threat and authoritarian attitudes in Europe: an empirical analysis of the exposure to COVID-19. European Union Politics 23, 417436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fincher, CL, Thornhill, R, Murray, DR and Schaller, M (2008) Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275, 12791285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiorina, MP (1981) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Freedom_House (n.d.). Freedom in the World 2020: Myanmar. https://freedomhouse.org/country/myanmar/freedom-world/2020Google Scholar
Frey, CB, Chen, C and Presidente, G (2020) Democracy, culture, and contagion: political regimes and countries responsiveness to Covid-19. Covid Economics 18, 120.Google Scholar
Gordon, SH, Huberfeld, N and Jones, DK (2020) What federalism means for the US response to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Health Forum 1, e200510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hainmueller, J, Hopkins, DJ and Yamamoto, T (2014) Causal inference in conjoint analysis: understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis 22, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, TK, Stocks, TVA , McKay, R, Gibson-Miller, J, Levita, L, Martinez, AP, Mason, L, McBride, O, Murphy, J, Shevlin, M, Bennett, KM, Hyland, P, Karatzias, T, Vallières, F and Bentall, RP (2021) The authoritarian dynamic during the COVID-19 pandemic: effects on nationalism and anti-immigrant sentiment. Social Psychological and Personality Science 12, 12741285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegele, Y and Schnabel, J (2021) Federalism and the management of the COVID-19 crisis: centralisation, decentralisation and (non-) coordination. West European Politics 44, 10521076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, H, Ordoñez, G, Konradt, M and Trebesch, C (2020) Corona politics: the cost of mismanaging pandemics. PIER Working Paper No. 20-033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horiuchi, Y, Markovich, Z and Yamamoto, T (2022) Does conjoint analysis mitigate social desirability bias? Political Analysis 30, 535549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htwe, ZZ (2020) Myanmar volunteers play vital role in Yangon's battle against COVID-19. The Irrawaddy. https://www.irrawaddy.com/specials/myanmar-covid-19/myanmar-volunteers-play-vital-role-yangons-battle-covid-19.htmlGoogle Scholar
Huberfeld, N, Gordon, SH and Jones, DK (2020) Federalism complicates the response to the COVID-19 health and economic crisis: what can be done? Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 45, 951965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyun, J, Setoguchi, A and Brazelton, MA (2022) Some reflections on the history of masked societies in east Asia. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 16, 108116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karabulut, G, Zimmermann, KF, Bilgin, MH and Doker, AC (2021) Democracy and COVID-19 outcomes. Economics Letters 203, 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kettl, DF (2020) States divided: the implications of American federalism for COVID-19. In Cockerham, W and Cockerham, G (eds), The COVID-19 Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 165181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritzinger, S, Foucault, M, Lachat, R, Partheymüller, J, Plescia, C and Brouard, S (2021) ‘Rally round the flag’: the COVID-19 crisis and trust in the national government. West European Politics 44, 12051231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kushida, KE (2014) The Fukushima nuclear disaster and the Democratic Party of Japan: leadership, structures, and information challenges during the crisis. The Japanese Political Economy 40, 2968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzushima, S, McElwain, KM and Shiraito, Y (2024) Public preferences for international law compliance: respecting legal obligations or conforming to common practices? The Review of International Organizations 19, 6393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, AJ, Schott, JP and Scherer, L (2011) Threat, politics, and attitudes: toward a greater understanding of rally-’round-the-flag effects. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20, 343348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lay, JC (2009) Race, retrospective voting, and disasters: the re-election of C. Ray Nagin after Hurricane Katrina. Urban Affairs Review 44, 645662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, G and Shiraito, Y (2023) Multiple hypothesis testing in conjoint analysis. Political Analysis 31, 380395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, G, McElwain, KM and Shiraito, Y (2023) The clash of traditional values: opposition to female monarchs. European Political Science Review 15, 291310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magalhães, PC (2014) Introduction – financial crisis, austerity, and electoral politics. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 24, 125133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matuschek, C, Moll, F, Fangerau, H, Fischer, JC , Zänker, K, Van Griensven, M and Schneider, M (2020) The history and value of face masks. European Journal of Medical Research 25, 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendoza Aviña, M and Sevi, S (2021) Did exposure to COVID-19 affect vote choice in the 2020 presidential election? Research & Politics 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680211041505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, JE (1970) Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson. American Political Science Review 64, 1834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, DR and Schaller, M (2010) Historical prevalence of infectious diseases within 230 geopolitical regions: a tool for investigating origins of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 41, 99108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, DR, Trudeau, R and Schaller, M (2011) On the origins of cultural differences in conformity: four tests of the pathogen prevalence hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37, 318329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oneal, JR and Bryan, AL (1995) The Rally ’round the flag effect in US foreign policy crises, 1950–1985. Political Behavior 17, 379401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repucci, S and Slipowitz, A (2022) Freedom in the world: the global expansion of authoritarian rule. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2022/global-expansion-authoritarian-ruleGoogle Scholar
Shoji, M, Ito, A, Cato, S, Iida, T, Ishida, K, Katsumata, H and McElwain, KM (2021) Prosociality and the uptake of COVID-19 contact tracing apps: survey analysis of intergenerational differences in Japan. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 9, e29923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stasavage, D (2020) Democracy, autocracy, and emergency threats: lessons for COVID-19 from the last thousand years. International Organization 74, E117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thies, MF and Yanai, Y (2022) Did COVID-19 impact Japan's 2021 general election?. In Pekkanen, RJ, Reed, SR and Smith, DM (eds), Japan Decides 2021: The Japanese General Election. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 219236.Google Scholar
Wittekind, CT (2021) Crisis upon crisis: fighting COVID-19 becomes a political struggle after Myanmar's military coup. ISEAS Perspective 67.Google Scholar
Yam, KC, Jackson, JC, Barnes, CM , Lau, J, Qin, X and Lee, HY (2020) The rise of COVID-19 cases is associated with support for world leaders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 2542925433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamamoto, N and Bauer, G (2020) Apparent difference in fatalities between central Europe and East Asia due to SARS-COV-2 and COVID-19: four hypotheses for possible explanation. Medical Hypotheses 144, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, L, Li, M, Wan, JY, Howard, SC, Bailey, JE and Graff, JC (2022) Democracy and case fatality rate of COVID-19 at early stage of pandemic: a multicountry study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29, 86948704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y, Zou, B, Zhang, H and Zhang, J (2023) Are Chinese citizens satisfied with lockdown performance during the COVID-19 outbreak period? A survey from Wuhan, Shulan, and Nanjing. Public Organization Review 23, 551573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar