Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T13:32:27.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Puzzle of Ineffective Election Campaigning in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

AXEL KLEIN
AXEL KLEIN*
Affiliation:
Deutsches Institut für Japanstudien (DIJ), Tokyoklein@dijtokyo.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Japan, electoral campaigning in plurality districts often appears strangely ineffective to observers. In their explanations, political scientists have so far fallen back on the proximate cause, namely the strict Public Office Election Law (Kōshoku senkyo-hō), claiming that it is this law that prohibits different and more effective campaigning. This study, however, is based on the assumption that such an explanation could be insufficient since even those campaign tactics legally allowed are often executed and/or selected in an apparently ineffective way in terms of their appeal to voters. Especially when looked at from the perspective of structural learning theory, which assumes that actors adapt their behavior within stable structures by learning what works well and what does not, these observations invite further investigation.

As a first step, participant observation was used to identify types of apparently ineffective campaigning. In the second step, these types were discussed in qualitative interviews with candidates and other practitioners. The results show that next to appealing to voters there are other campaign goals that can determine the choice of electoral instruments: motivating campaign staffers, maintaining good working relationships with external helpers, presenting political convictions and personal determination. This explains part of the assumed ineffectiveness, but not all of it. When seen through the lens of structural learning theory research findings suggest that the lack of clear feedback regarding the impact of campaign activities on voters inhibits the learning processes of candidates. In combination with constraints regarding time, place and/or resources, these factors shape election campaigning to a considerable degree. Consequently, this study suggests that explanations need to take more factors into account than just the Public Office Election Law in order to solve the puzzle of ineffective campaigning in Japan.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , April 2011 , pp. 57 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Aberbach, J. D. and Rockman, B. A. (2002), ‘Conducting and coding elite interviews’, Political Science and Politics, 35: 673–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Raymond V. (1994), ‘Electoral Reform in Japan: How It Was Enacted and Changes It May Bring’, Asian Survey, 34 (7): 589–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Raymond V. (2000), Ending the LDP Hegemony: Party Cooperation in Japan, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Cialdini, Robert B. (2001), Influence: Science and Practice, 4th edition, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Curtis, Gerald L. (1971), Election Campaigning Japanese Style, New York and London: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dabney, Dyron (2008), ‘Campaign Behavior: The Limits of Change’, in Martin, Sherry L. and Steel, Gill (eds.), Democratic Reform in Japan: Assessing the Impact, Boulder, CO and London: Lynne Rienner, pp. 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukui, Haruhiro and Fukai, Shigeko (1999), ‘Campaigning for the Japanese Diet’, in Grofman, Bernard, Lee, Sung-Chull, Winkler, Edwin A., and Woodall, Brian (eds.), Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Fukuoka, Masayuki (1997), ‘Shin senkyo seido ka no dai-yonjūikkai shūin sōsenkyo no bunseki [Analysis of the 41, General Election, held under the new electoral system]’, presentation at the University of Nagoya, 13 May 1997.Google Scholar
Gold, Raymond L. (1958), ‘Roles in Sociological Fieldwork’, Social Forces, 36: 217–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horiuchi, Yusaku (2005), Institutions, Incentives and Electoral Participation in Japan: Cross-Level and Cross-National Perspectives: London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isao, Niwa (1998), ‘The End of Competitive Coexistence: Large Companies and Their Unions under Japan's New Election System’, in Ōtake, Hideo (ed.), How Electoral Reform Boomeranged: Continuity in Japanese Campaigning Style, Tōkyō: Japan Center for International Exchange, pp. 123–46.Google Scholar
Johnson, Stephen (2000), Opposition Politics in Japan – Strategies under a One-Party Dominant Regime, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Katō, Shūjirō (1997), ‘Chōfuku de “kyūsai” saretemo hajiru koto nashi [There's nothing embarrassing about being “rescued” by proportional candidacy]’, Kokkai Geppō, 1: 10–13.Google Scholar
Katō, Shūjirō (2003), Nihon no senkyo [Elections in Japan], Tōkyō: Chūō Kōron Shinsha.Google Scholar
Köllner, Patrick (2003), ‘Upper House Elections in Japan and the Power of the “Organized Vote”’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 3 (1): 113–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, Ellis S. and Pekkanen, Robert (2004), ‘Explaining Party Adaptation to Electoral Reform: The Discreet Charm of the LDP?’, Journal of Japanese Studies, 30 (1): 1–34.Google Scholar
Maeda, Ko (2008), ‘Has the Electoral-System Reform Made Japanese Elections More Party-Centered?’, in Reed, Steven R., McElwain, Kenneth Mori, and Shimizu, Kay (eds.), Political Change in Japan: Electoral Behavior, Party Realignment, and the Koizumi Reforms, Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center Books, Baltimore: Brookings, pp. 47–66.Google Scholar
McKean, Margaret A. and Scheiner, Ethan (2000), ‘Japans New Electoral System: La plus ca change. . .’, Electoral Studies, 19: 447–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyoshi, Norimasa (2007), Sugu wakaru senkyo undō – kēsu de miru ihan to bassoku [Election campaigning made easy – examples of felonies and punishments], Tōkyō: Imajin.Google Scholar
Ningen no Kagaku Shinsha (2007), Tōsen mukō – rikkōho kinshi: Shin renzasei taiō Q&A [Electoral victory invalid – candidacy prohibited: regarding the application of the new system of joint liability Q&A], Tōkyō: Ningen no Kakagu Shinsha.Google Scholar
Ōtake, Hideo (ed.) (1998), How Electoral Reform Boomeranged: Continuity in Japanese Campaigning Style, Tōkyō: Japan Center for International Exchange.Google Scholar
Park, Cheol Hee (1998), ‘The Enduring Campaign Networks of Tōkyō's Shitamachi District’, in Ōtake, Hideo (ed.), How Electoral Reform Boomeranged: Continuity in Japanese Campaigning Style, Tōkyō: Japan Center for International Exchange, pp. 78–105.Google Scholar
Park, Cheol Hee (2000), Daigishi no tsukurarekata – shōsenkyoku no senkyo senryaku [How a parliamentarian is made – strategies in single member districts], Tōkyō: Bunshun Shinsho.Google Scholar
Parker, Martin (2000), Organizational Culture and Identity, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C. (2008), ‘Interviewing and Qualitative Field Methods: Pragmatism and Practicalities’, in Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 685–701.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R. (1993), Making Common Sense of Japan, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R. (1995), ‘The Nomination Process for Japan's Next General Election: Waiting for the Heiritsu-sei’, Asian Survey, 12: 1075–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Steven R. and Thies, Michael F. (2001), ‘The Consequences of Electoral Reform in Japan’, in Soberg Shugart, Matthew and Wattenberg, Martin P. (eds.), Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 381–403.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R., Scheiner, Ethan, and Thies, Michael F. (2009), ‘New Ballgame in Politics’, The Oriental Economist (October): 8–9.Google Scholar
Saitō, Hiroshi (1995), Shin kōsen-hō shita no senkyo undō to seiji katsudō [Electoral campaigning under the New Public Office Election Law], Tōkyō: Tōhō.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip, E. (2000), ‘Coping with Trade-Offs: Psychological Constraints and Political Implications’, in Luppia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Popkin, Samuel L. (eds.), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 239–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wada, Junichirō (1996), The Japanese Election System – Three Analytical Perspectives, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yamauchi, Kazuhiko (2007), Jimintō de senkyo to giin o yarimashita [I campaigned and was a parliamentarian for the LDP], Tōkyō: Kakugawa SSC Shinsho.Google Scholar
Yasuoka, Okiharu (1996), Q&A Shin renza sei handobukku – sensei no seijika seimei ga abunai [Q&A guide to the new system of guilt by association – the political life of lawmakers is in danger], Tōkyō: Shuppanken.Google Scholar

Documentary films

Klein, Axel (2008), Pictures at an Election or How to Win Votes in Japan, 78 min. Tōkyō: Deutsches Institut für Japanstudien Tokyo.Google Scholar
Soda, Kazuhiro (2005), Senkyo, 120 min. Japan and USA: Laboratory X.Google Scholar