No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Two Islamic Movements in conflict in terms of linguistic nationalism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 May 2017
Abstract
Religion and nationalism are not only two distinctive but also closely related concepts when it comes to nation-building. Their role in language policy and linguistic nationalism is pervasive. Today, in Turkey, two religious movements of the same origin play a key role in linguistic nationalism and decision-making in language policy: the Gülen movement and the Med-Zehra movement. These two non-governmental affinities are important groups in the Nur movement. The Gülen movement is supportive of Turkish nationalism and thereby Turkish language and identity, while the Med-Zehra group emphasizes Kurdish identity and separatism. This study makes a comparison between the two movements and investigates in detail their role in language policy and linguistic nationalism.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
References
Aras, B. and Caha, Ö. (2000), ‘Fethullah Gülen and his Liberal “Turkish Islam” Movement’, Middle East Review of International Affairs, 4 (4): 30–42.Google Scholar
Atacan, F. (2001), ‘A Kurdish Islamist Group in Modern Turkey: Shifting Identities’, Middle Eastern Studies, 37 (3): 111–44.Google Scholar
Atatürk, M. K. (2012), ‘Millet’, in Milletler ve Milliyetçilikler, Istanbul: Etkileşim, pp. 259–66.Google Scholar
Balcı, B. (2003), ‘Fetullah Gülen's Missionary Schools in Central Asia and Their Role in the Spreading of Turkism and Islam’, Religion, State and Society, 31 (2): 151–77.Google Scholar
Balcı, B. (2005), Orta Asya'da İslam Misyonerleri: Fethullah Güeln Okulları;, Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları.Google Scholar
Baskan, F. (2005), ‘The Fethullah Gülen Community: Contribution or Barrier to the Consolidation of Democracy in Turkey?’, Middle Eastern Studies, 41 (6): 849–61.Google Scholar
Bingöl, Y. (2009), ‘Language, Identity and Politics in Turkey: Nationalist Discourse on Creating a Common Turkic Language’, Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 8 (2): 40–52.Google Scholar
Brubaker, R. (2012), ‘Religion and Nationalism: Four Approaches’, Nations and Nationalism, 18 (1): 2–20.Google Scholar
Bulaç, A. (2005), ‘Türk Okulları: Küresel Bir Açılım’, in Barış Köprüleri: Dünyaya açılan Türk okulları;, Istanbul: Da Yayıncılık, pp. 183–97.Google Scholar
Bulaç, A. (2010), Yeryüzü bahçesinin çocukları;, www.zaman.com.tr [accessed 12 June 2010].Google Scholar
Çetinsaya, G. (1999), ‘Rethinking Nationalism and Islam: Some Preliminary Notes on the Roots of “Turkish–Islamic Synthesis” in Modern Turkish Political Thought’, Muslim World, 89 (3–4): 350–76.Google Scholar
Çevik, Y. (2012), ‘The Relections of Kurdish Islamism and Everchanging Discourse of Kurdish Nationalists Toward Islam in Turkey’, Turkish Journal of Politics, 3 (1): 85–98.Google Scholar
Ebaugh, H. R. (2010), The Gulen Movement: A Sociological Analysis of a Civic Movement Rooted in Moderate Islam, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Ecevit, B. (2005), ‘Türk Okullarının Türk Dili ve Türkiye'ye Katkısı’, %1 içindeBarış Köprüleri: Dünyaya Açılan Türk Okulları;, Istanbul: Da Yayıncılık, pp. 17–27.Google Scholar
Eickelman, D. F. (2000), ‘Islam and the Language of Modernity’, Daedalus, 129 (1): 119–35.Google Scholar
Farhi, D. (1971), ‘The Şeriat as a Political Slogan: Or the “Incident of the 31st Mart”’, Middle Eastern Studies, 7 (3): 275–99.Google Scholar
Gencer, A. I. (1978), ‘İlk Osmanlı Anayasasında Türkçe'nin Resmi Dil Olarak Kabulü Meselesi’, in Armağan Kanun-i Esasi'nin 100. Yılı;, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları, pp. 183–9.Google Scholar
Ghadbian, N. (1997), Democratization and the Islamist Challenge in the Arab World, Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Gökalp, Z. (2005), Türkleşmek, Muasırlaşmak, İslamlaşmak, Istanbul: Akvaryum Yayınları.Google Scholar
Halliday, F. (1995), ‘Fundamentalism and the Contemporary World’, Contention: Debates in Society, Culture, and Science, 4 (2): 47–8.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. (1990), Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
International (2008), Global Muslim Networks: How Far They Have Travelled, http://www.economist.com/node/10808408 [accessed 6 March 2008].Google Scholar
Karpat, K. H. (2005), ‘Yurt Dışındaki Türk Okullarının Değeri’, in Barış Köprüleri: Dünyaya Açılan Türk Okulları;, Istanbul: Da Yayıncılık, pp. 53–65.Google Scholar
Lacey, J. (2009), ‘The Gülen Movement in Ireland: Civil Society Engagements of a Turkish Religio-Cultural Movement’, Turkish Studies, 10 (2): 295–315.Google Scholar
Lorasdağı, B. K. (2010), ‘The Prospects and Pitfalls of the Religious Nationalist Movement in Turkey: The Case of the Gülen Movement’, Middle Eastern Studies, 46 (2): 221–34.Google Scholar
Mardin, Ş. (2010), Bediüzzaman Said Nursi Olayı: Modern Türkiye'de Din ve Toplumsal Değişim, Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları.Google Scholar
May, S. (2012), Language and Minority Rights: Ethnicity, Nationalism, and the Politics of Language, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mecham, R. Q. (2004), ‘From the Ashes of Virtue, a Promise of Light: The Transformation of Political Islam in Turkey’, 25(2): 339–58.Google Scholar
Özdalga, E. (2006), ‘The Hidden Arab: A Critical Reading of the Notion of Turkish Islam’, Middle Eastern Studies, 42 (4): 551–70.Google Scholar
Özdalga, E. (2009), ‘Islamism and Nationalism as Sister Ideologies: Reflections on the Politicization of Islam in a Longue Durée Perspective’, Middle Eastern Studies, 45 (3): 407–23.Google Scholar
Özdalga, E. (2010), ‘Transformation of Sufi-Based Communities in Modern Turkey: The Nakşibendis, The Nurcus, and the Gülen Community’, in Öktem, K., Kerslake, C., and Robins, P., Turkey's Engagement with Modernity, New York: Palgrave, pp. 69–92.Google Scholar
Quataert, D. (2005), The Ottoman Empire: 1700–1922, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Razi, H. (1990), ‘Legitimacy, Religion, and Nationalism in the Middle East’, The American Political Science Review, 84 (1): 69–91.Google Scholar
Said, S. E. (1995), Between Pragmatism and Ideology (The Muslim Brotherhood in Jordan), Washington, DC: Washington Institute for Near East Policy.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. (2003a), Nationalism and Modernism: A Critical Survey of Recent Theories of Nations and Nationalism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Steller, T. (2010), Gülen Movement: An Enigmatic Mix of Turkish Nationalism, Religion, Education, http://azstarnet.com [accessed 25 April 2010].Google Scholar
Toppo, G. (2010), Schools with Turkish Ties Draw Interest, www.usatoday.com [accessed 17 August 2010].Google Scholar
Tunaya, T. Z. (2010), Türkiye'nin Siyasi Hayatında Batılılaşma Hareketleri, Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.Google Scholar
Turgut, P. (2010), The Turkish Imam and his global educational mission. 26 April 2010. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1969290-1,00.html [accessed 8 February 2012].Google Scholar
Yavuz, M. H. (1999), ‘Towards an Islamic Liberalism?: The Nurcu Movement and Fethullah Gülen’, Middle Eastern Journal, 53 (4): 584–605.Google Scholar
Yavuz, M. H. (2006), ‘The Renaissance of Religious Consciousness in Turkey: Nur Study Circles’, in Islam in Public: Turkey, Iran, and Europe, Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi University Press, pp. 129–61.Google Scholar
Zubaida, S. (1996), ‘Turkish Islam and National Identity’, Middle East Report, pp. 10–15.Google Scholar
Zubaida, S. (2001), ‘Islam and the Politics of Community’, Middle East Report, 31 (221): 20–7.Google Scholar