No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Prosecutors and Presidents in New Democracies: The Russia Case
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 February 2017
Abstract
This article aims at an empirical verification of prosecutors’ partisan behavior through a case study based on the Russian President Yeltsin and Putin periods. According to Gretchen Helmke's original theory of strategic defection, dependent judges may occasionally check their principal, the executive leadership, by withdrawing their support in the course of an electoral cycle. However, a modified theory of strategic defection can be readily applied to civil-law prosecutors’ behavior in new presidential democracies, where several presidents dominated that office during most of their tenure but experienced prosecutorial defection in their final phase. Russia provides a textbook case for examining the modified theory in relation to prosecutors’ partisan behavior against an incumbent president. Meanwhile, this paper uses within-case analysis based on a qualitative method, because the methodological approach can have more advantages in discovering whether prosecutors acted ‘really’ strategically when an incumbent government was outgoing in Russia, and in further explaining a pattern of prosecutors’ partisan attitudes in new presidential democracies, through the modified version of Helmke's theory.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
References
Alivizatos, N. C. (1995), ‘Judges as Veto Player’, in Doring, H. (ed.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, pp. 569–88.Google Scholar
Aslund, A. (2007), Russia's Capitalist Revolution, Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Barzilai, G. (1997), ‘Between the Rule of Law and the Laws of the Ruler’, International Social Science Journal, 49: 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, G. A. (1986), ‘Neither the Purse nor the Sword: Dynamics of Public Confidence in the Supreme Court’, American Political Science Review, 80: 1209–26.Google Scholar
Carey, J. M. (2005), ‘Presidential versus Parliamentary Government’, in Menard, C. and Shirley, M. M. (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 91–122.Google Scholar
Chavez, R. B. (2008), ‘The Role of Law and Courts in Democratizing Regimes’, in Whittington, K. E., Kelemen, R. D., and Caldeira, G. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–80.Google Scholar
Chen, L. (2004), ‘Power Plays: Reallocating Power under the New Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure’, North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, 30: 429–72.Google Scholar
Collier, D., Mahoney, J., and Seawright, J. (2004), ‘Claiming Too Much: Warnings about Selection Bias’, in H. Brady, E. and Collier, D. (eds.), Rethinking Inquiry, Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield, pp. 85–102.Google Scholar
Dammer, H. R. and Albanese, J. S. (2014), Comparative Criminal Justice System, 5th edn, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Desch, M. C. (1999), Civilian Control of the Military, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Federico, G. (1995), ‘Italy: A Peculiar Case’, in Tate, C. Neal and Vallinder, Torbjorn (eds.), The Global Expansion of Judicial Power, New York: New York University Press, pp. 233–42.Google Scholar
Di Federico, G. (1998), ‘Prosecutorial Independence and the Democratic Requirement of Accountability in Italy’, British Journal of Criminology, 38: 371–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diehm, J. W. (2001), ‘The Introduction of Jury Trials and Adversarial Elements into the Former Soviet Union and Other Inquisitorial Countries’, Florida State Journal of Transnational Law and Policy, 11: 1–38.Google Scholar
Elgie, R. (1999), ‘France’, in Elgie, Robert (ed.), Semi-Presidentialism in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ershov, K. (2010), ‘Russian Federation's Law No. 87-Ф3: Political Machination or Procedural Reform?’, Pace International Law Review Online Companion, 1: 1–20.Google Scholar
Fortescue, S. (2006), Russia's Oil Barons and Metal Magnates, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gelman, V. (2005), ‘Political Opposition in Russia: A Dying Species?’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 21: 226–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, A. L. and Bennett, A. (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in Social Sciences, 4th edn, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, M. (2008), Oilopoly: Putin, Power and the Rise of the New Russia, Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. D. (2009), ‘The Kremlin's Eye: The 21st Century Prokuratura in the Russian Authoritarian Tradition’, Stanford Journal of International Law, 45: 1–50.Google Scholar
Guarnieri, C. (2003), ‘Courts as an Instrument of Horizontal Accountability: The Case of Latin Europe’, in Maravall, J. M. and Przeworski, A. (eds.), Democracy and the Rule of Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–41.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. (2008), ‘Non-Prosecutorial Functions of the Prosecutors in Common Law Countries’, Paper Prepared for Conference of Prosecutors General of Europe Organized by the Council of Europe and the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation, St Petersburg, 2–3 July.Google Scholar
Helmke, G. (2002), ‘The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court-Executive Relations in Argentina under Dictatorship and Democracy’, American Political Science Review, 96: 291–303.Google Scholar
Holmes, S. (1999), ‘The Procuracy and Its Problems: Introduction’, East European Constitutional Review, 8: 76–79.Google Scholar
Igorev, A. (1998), ‘Podchinennye Russkogo golodayut’ (Russians are starving), Kommersant, 17 June.Google Scholar
Izvestiia
(1994), ‘Kazannik ob'yasnyaet svoyu otstavku tem, chto ot nego trebovali “narushit'zakon”’ (Kazannik explains that his resignation was because he was forced to break the law), 1 March.Google Scholar
Jiménez, F. (1998), ‘Political Scandals and Political Responsibility in Democratic Spain’, West European Politics, 21: 80–99.Google Scholar
Jowitt, K. (1983), ‘Soviet Neotraditionalism: The Political Corruption of a Leninist Regime’, Soviet Studies, 35: 275–97.Google Scholar
Koltsova, E. (2000), ‘Changes in the Coverage of the Chechen Wars: Reasons and Consequences’, Media and War, 7: 39–54.Google Scholar
Kommersant
(2000), ‘Luzhkov ostalsya bez svoego prokurora’ (Luzhkov left without his own prosecutor), 14 January.Google Scholar
Konstitutsiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii (The Constitution of the Russian Federation)
(1993), Moskva: Iuridicheskaya literatura.Google Scholar
Korolkov, I. (1995), ‘FSK izvestno imya ubiitsy Dmitrya Kholodova’ (FSK knows the name of the murderer of Kholodov), Izvestiia, 6 January.Google Scholar
Kryshtanovskaya, O. and White, S. (2003), ‘Putin's Militocracy’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 19: 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvurt, Y. (2007), ‘Selective Prosecution in Russia: Myth or Reality?’, Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, 15: 127–68.Google Scholar
Latyshev, A. (2007), ‘Prezident Rossii Vladimir Putin: nikakikh preemnikov ne budet’ (Russian President Putin), Izvestiia, 2 February.Google Scholar
Lee, S.-W. (2014), ‘The Discordant Combination of Civil-Law Prosecution System and Presidentialism: A Theoretical Framework’, Journal of Politics and Law, 7: 81–93.Google Scholar
Lee, S.-W. (2015), ‘The Organizational Characters of a Post-Soviet State Bureaucracy: The Case of Russian Procuracy’, Eurasian Review, 7: 20–9.Google Scholar
Liberman, E. S. (2005), ‘Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research’, American Political Science Review, 99: 435–52.Google Scholar
Linz, J. J. (1994), ‘Presidentialism or Parliamentarism: Does It Make a Difference?’, in J. Linz, J. and Valenzuela, A. (eds.), The Failure of Presidential Democracy, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 3–87
Google Scholar
Mikhailovskaya, I. (1999), ‘The Procuracy and Its Problems: Russia’, East European Constitutional Review, 8: 98–104.Google Scholar
Murashin, G. (1972), Organy prokuratury v mekhanizme Sovetskogo gosudarstva (The Organs of Procuracy in the Mechanism of the Soviet System), Kiev: Naukovadumka.Google Scholar
Paterson, B. I. (2010), ‘Within-Case Analysis’, in Mills, A. J., Durepos, G. and Wiebe, E. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Case Study of Research, Vol. 2. London: Sage, pp. 970–2.Google Scholar
Paukov, A. (2000), ‘Welcome Back: Berezovsky and Gusinsky Are Awaited at the Prosecutor General's Office’, Vremia novostei, 2 November, translated by Current Digest of the Russian Press, 52.Google Scholar
Pyanykh, G. (2000), ‘Zagranitsa pomogaet Vladimiru Gusinskomu’ (A foreign country helps Gusinsky), Kommersant, 29 September.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, G. N. (1992), ‘Judicial Independence and the Reality of Political Power’, The Review of Politics, 54: 369–88.Google Scholar
Rossiiskaia gazeta
(1999), ‘Ukaz prezidenta RF o Skuratove Yu. N’ (Presidential decree on Skuratov), 3 April.Google Scholar
Rutland, P. (2005), ‘Putin and the Oligarchs’, in Herspring, Dale (ed.), Putin's Russia, Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield, pp. 161–82.Google Scholar
Sakwa, R. (2011), The Crisis of Russian Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saradzhyan, S. (2000a), ‘Prosecutors Arrests NTV Boss Gusinsky’, Moscow Times, 14 June.Google Scholar
Saradzhyan, S. (2000b), ‘Berezovsky Refuses to Face Prosecutor’, Moscow Times, 15 November.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. (1981), Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shevtsova, L. (2004), ‘Russian Democracy in Eclipse: The Limits of Bureaucratic Authoritarianism’, Journal of Democracy, 15: 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, M. S. and Carey, J. M. (1992), Presidents and Assemblies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. B. (1978), The Soviet Procuracy and the Supervision of Administration, Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Smith, G. B. (2007), ‘The Procuracy, Putin, and the Rule of Law in Russia’, in Feldbrugge, F. J. M. (ed.), Russia, Europe, and the Rule of Law, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Skuratov, Y. (2012), Putin – ispolnitel’ zloivoli (Putin – performer of evil will), Moskva: Algoritm.Google Scholar
Stanley, A. (1996), ‘Campaign Scandal Charges Heighten Russian Rivalries’, New York Times, 16 November.Google Scholar
Tate, C. N. and Haynie, S. L. (1994), ‘Building a Scientific Comparative Judicial Politics and Arousing the Dragons of Antiscientism’, Law and Society Review
28: 377–94.Google Scholar
Tate, C. N. and Vallinder, T. (1995), ‘The Global Expansion of Judicial Power: The Judicialization of Politics’, in Tate, C. N. and Vallinder, T. (eds.), The Global Expansion of Judicial Power, New York: New York University Press, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. D. (2011), State Building in Putin's Russia, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
The World Justice Project (2013), The WJP Rule of Law Index 2012–13, Washington, DC: The World Justice Project.Google Scholar
Ulyanov, N. (1999), ‘Skuratov otstranen ot dolzhnosti’ (Skuratov was dismissed from his position), Nezavisimaia gazeta, 3 April.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, A. (1993), ‘Latin America: Presidentialism in Crisis’, Journal of Democracy, 4: 3–16.Google Scholar
Vanberg, G. (2001), ‘Legislative–Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review’, American Journal of Political Science, 45: 346–61.Google Scholar
Viktorov, A. (1999), ‘Yuri Skuratov proposal sebe otstavky’ (Skuratov resigned), Segodnia, 3 February.Google Scholar
Way, L. A. (2005), ‘Authoritarian State Building and the Sources of Regime Competitiveness in the Fourth Wave’, World Politics, 57: 231–61.Google Scholar
Wishnevsky, J. (2006), ‘The Role of Scandals in Post-Communist Russia’, in Garrard, J. and Newell, J. L. (eds.), Scandals in Past and Contemporary Politics, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 179–93.Google Scholar
Yasin, Y. (2012), Prizhivetsya li demokratiia v Rossii (Adapting to democracy in Russia), Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.Google Scholar
Zvyagintsev, A. G. (2012), Istoriia Rossiiskoi prokuratury. 1722–2012 (The history of Russian Procuracy), Moscow: Olma.Google Scholar