Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T02:20:15.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Overcontrol in Advertising Experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2003

Paul W. Farris
Affiliation:
Colgate Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Virginia
David J. Reibstein
Affiliation:
Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Extract

Market A is selected as the test city. Three levels of advertising “frequency” are to be tested by beaming corresponding numbers of commercials to three groups of randomly selected households. Sales to the three groups are to be measured with either diary panel data or scanner data. Since market A has been determined to be representative of the total area under consideration, the three levels of purchase probability associated with the levels of advertising are to be used in constructing an advertising-sales response function for budgeting purposes.

According to many (Simon and Arndt, 1980, for example), such an experiment manifests the state of the art for assessing the effects of advertising on sales. This paper argues that such state-of-the-art experiments overcontrol the environment, and hence may mismeasure the effects of advertising. More specifically, a single-market experiment may control “away” effects of advertising.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The ARF 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)