Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T01:27:57.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

White Working-class Women and the Invention of Apartheid: ‘Purified’ Afrikaner Nationalist Agitation for Legislation Against ‘Mixed’ Marriages, 1934–9

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Jonathan Hyslop
Jonathan Hyslop
Affiliation:
University of the Witwatersrand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The South African white general election of 1938 was largely fought around a poster. The poster was published by the supporters of D. F. Malan's hard-line Afrikaner Nationalists, who were attempting to unseat the more pro-imperial United Party (UP) government of Hertzog and Smuts. The poster portrayed the alleged threat of ‘mixed’ marriages to Afrikaner women, and attacked the UP for failing to legislate against it. Rejecting J. M. Coetzee's contention that such racist manifestations can solely be understood in terms of the unconscious, the paper argues that shifting gender relations amongst Afrikaners were crucial to this agitation. As young Afrikaner women moved into industry on a large scale during the 1920s and 1930s, men experienced women's greater economic and social independence as a challenge to their authority. Nationalist leaders played successfully on this insecurity by appealing to men to ‘protect’ women against supposed black threats, including ‘mixed’ marriages. The particular campaign of 1938, however, backfired somewhat on the Malanites. The Hertzog and Smuts supporters were divided over the proposal for legislation. But even their liberal faction was against ‘mixed’ marriages; they simply did not see a law as the best way of preventing it. The UP responded to the Nationalist campaign by arguing that white women were being insulted by the mere suggestion that they would marry across the colour line. They used this particular strand of racism to mobilise white women and men against the Nationalists. But the whole affair ultimately smoothed the way for Malan to legislate against ‘mixed’ marriage after he came to power in 1948. The combined effects of both Nationalist and UP campaigns was to strengthen racist opinion about the issue. In order to avoid the divisions in his party on the marriage question, Hertzog handed it over to a Commission of Inquiry. The 1939 De Villiers Report recommended in favour of legislation, but was not acted on because of the break-up of the Hertzog–Smuts government. Yet this UP appointed commission was ultimately used by the Nationalist government as the basis of its own racist marriage legislation.

Type
Women in Politics
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 57 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Die Burger, 8 05 1938.Google Scholar

2 See the photographs in Brink, Elsabe, ‘The Afrikaner women of the Garment Worker's Union, 1918–1938’(M.A. dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, 1986), vi, xxi–xxv.Google Scholar

3 Coetzee, John M., ‘The mind of apartheid: Geoffrey Cronje (1907-)’, Social Dynamics, 17 (1991), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Ibid. 30.

5 Ibid. 27.

6 Ibid. 27.

7 Ibid. 27.

8 Ibid. 28.

9 The emergence of the GNP in the 1930s can be understood as analogous to developments in the turn-of-the-century American South. MacLean, Nancy, ‘The Leo Frank Case reconsidered: gender and sexual politics in the making of reactionary populism’, The Journal of American History, LXXVIII (1991), 917–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar, identifies a form of political mobilization which she calls ‘reactionary populism’ in which anti-élitism coexists with and gains support for a political agenda aimed at maintaining particular social hierarchies. MacLean's article is very suggestive in identifying the role of gender politics in such movements. In her account, she shows how in Georgia, as young white women were drawn into industrial labour in the cities, their new-found independence challenged domestic power relations. The fact that the working woman was now outside the home was a standing threat to the generational authority of parents and the patriarchal authority of fathers and husbands. The power of reactionary populism was that it tapped the emotional fears of Southern males about their declining authority over women and linked these anxieties to their concern about the threat to racial control over blacks posed by urbanization. The racist political mobilization of the period was so appealing to Southern white men because their claim to ‘protect’ Southern white women against blacks shored up their position in the hierarchy of gender just as centrally as it did their position in the hierarchy of race. The dynamics of South African politics in the 1930s are strikingly similar.

10 Walker, Cherryl, The Women's Suffrage Movement in South Africa (Cape Town, 1979), 84.Google Scholar

11 Hart, Caroline and Parnell, Susan, ‘Church, state and the shelter of white working-class women in Johannesburg, 1920–1955’, South African Geographical Journal, LXXI (1989), 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Van Niekerk, Andrea, ‘The use of white female labour by the Zebediela Citrus Estate, 1926–1953’ (M.A. dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, 1988), 58.Google Scholar

13 Ibid. 68–70.

14 Ibid. 67.

15 Ibid.

16 Walker, , Women's Suffrage, 56.Google Scholar

17 Brink, , ‘Afrikaner women’, 64.Google Scholar

18 Ibid. 191.

19 Ibid.

20 Ibid.

21 Ibid. 59, 191.

22 Ibid. 63–4.

23 Ibid. 45.

24 Ibid. 56.

25 Ibid. 191.

26 Ibid. 56.

27 Ibid. 79–82, 91–5.

28 Ibid. 16–17, 25.

29 Brink, , ‘Afrikaner women’, 147–51Google Scholar; Van Niekerk, , ‘Female labour’, 73.Google Scholar

30 Brink, , ‘Afrikaner women’, 84–5.Google Scholar

31 Ibid. 165–7.

32 Ibid. 162.

33 Freed, Louis Franklin, The Problem of European Prostitution in Johannesburg (Cape Town, 1949), 102–4.Google Scholar

34 Parnell, Susan, ‘Public housing as a device for white residential segregation in Johannesburg’, Urban Geography (1988), 584–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35 Brink, , ‘Afrikaner women’, 155.Google Scholar

36 Mosse, George L., Nationalism and Sexuality: Middle Class Morality and Sexual Norms in Modern Europe (Madison, 1985), 32.Google Scholar

37 De Villiers, Charles et al. , Report of the Commission on Mixed Marriages (Pretoria, 1939), 26.Google Scholar

38 Hansard, 22 01 1937, 529.Google Scholar

39 De Villiers, , Commission, 25.Google Scholar

40 Toit, Andre Du, ‘Political control and personal morality’, in Schrire, Robert (ed.), South Africa: Public Policy Perspectives (Cape Town, 1982), 65Google Scholar; Findlay, Robert, Miscegenation: A Study of the Biological Sources of Inheritance of the South African European Population (Pretoria, 1936), 5.Google Scholar

41 Du Toit, , ‘Political control’, 64.Google Scholar

42 Ibid. 65.

43 De Villiers, , Commission, 27.Google Scholar

44 Dubow, Saul, Racial Segregation and the Origins of Apartheid in South Africa, 1919–1936 (London, 1989), 16–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45 See, for example, The Star, 15 05 1929.Google Scholar

46 Kruger, D. W., The Age of the Generals: A Short Political History of the Union of South Africa, 1910–1948 (Johannesburg, 1961), 148–9.Google Scholar

47 Du Toit, , ‘Political control’, 61.Google Scholar

48 O'Meara, Dan, Volkskapitalisme: Class, Capital and Ideology in the Development of Afrikaner Nationalism (Johannesburg, 1983), 78–95.Google Scholar

49 Brink, , ‘Afrikaner women’, 124–5.Google Scholar

50 Ibid. 124–5.

51 Die Vaderland, 17 11 1936Google Scholar, cited in Brink, , ‘Afrikaner women’, 156.Google Scholar

52 Parnell, , ‘Public housing’.Google Scholar

53 Die Burger, 5 10 1934Google Scholar, cited by Scholtz, W. L. von R., ‘Die rol van politieke opvattinge in die ontstaan van die wette’, in De Villiers, Ettienne and Kinghorn, Johann (eds.), Op die skaal: gemengde huwelike en ontug (Cape Town, 1984), 11–28.Google Scholar

54 Ibid.

55 Brink, , ‘Afrikaner women’, 186.Google Scholar

56 ‘Transvaal Nasionale Party – Notule van die Drie-en-Twintigste Kongres, gehou op Pretoria op 28, 29 en 30 Oktober 1936’, South African Library, Cape Town: A FOL 329 968 NAS.

57 Furlong, Patrick, Between Crown and Swastika: The Impact of the Radical Right on the Afrikaner Nationalist Movement in the Fascist Era (Hanover, 1991), 102.Google Scholar

58 Brink, Elsabe, ‘Man-made women: gender, class and the ideology of the volksmoeder’, in Walker, Cherryl (ed.), Women and Gender in South Africa to 1945 (Cape Town, 1990), 284.Google Scholar

59 De Villiers, , Commission, 17–18Google Scholar; Die Vaderland, 21 06 1935Google Scholar; Die Burger, 28 06 1937Google Scholar; Furlong, , Between Crown and Swastika, 107–8.Google Scholar

60 Swan, Maureen, ‘Ideology in organized Indian politics, 1891–1948’, in Marks, Shula and Trapido, Stanley (eds.), The Politics of Race, Class and Nationalism in Twentieth-Century South Africa (Harlow, 1987), 190.Google Scholar

61 Vlok, J., Magistrate, Bethal, to the Secretary for Justice Pretoria, 27 03 1937Google Scholar, University of the Witwatersrand: Hofmeyr Papers, A1 1Dg (file 1).

62 Ibid.

63 Ibid.

64 Ibid.

65 Ibid.

66 ‘Europeans employed by Asians 1937’, University of the Witwatersrand, Hofmeyr Papers: A1 1Dg (file 1).

67 Die Vaderland, 6 11 1934Google Scholar; Natal Mercury, 11 11 1934, 26 07 1935.Google Scholar

68 Natal Mercury, 11 06 1935.Google Scholar

69 Ibid.

70 Natal Mercury, 26 06 1935.Google Scholar

71 Die Vaderland, 30 10 1934.Google Scholar

72 Natal Mercury, 26 07 1935.Google Scholar

73 Ibid. 26 June 1935.

74 Die Vaderland, 21 06 1935.Google Scholar

75 Ibid. 3 Sept. 1935.

76 Rand Daily Mail, 16 09 1935, 11 10 1935.Google Scholar

77 Transcript of report from The Friend, 12 09 1935Google Scholar, University of the Witwatersrand: Hofmeyr Papers A1 1Dg (file 1).

78 Paton, Alan, Hofmeyr (Cape Town, 1964), 259.Google Scholar

79 Ibid. 167.

80 Indian Opinion, 16 10 1936Google Scholar; Hansard, 22 01 1937, 533.Google Scholar

81 Paton, , Hofmeyr, 242.Google Scholar

82 Ibid. 297.

83 Ibid. 231.

84 Ibid. 259.

85 Ibid. 238–9, 268.

86 The Star, 5 05 1938.Google Scholar

87 Paton, , Hofmeyr, 238.Google Scholar

88 Indian Opinion, 8 05 1936.Google Scholar

89 De Villiers, , Commission, 15.Google Scholar

90 Paton, , Hofmeyr, 238Google Scholar; Hansard, 28 04 1936, 2696.Google Scholar

91 Hansard, 28 04 1936, 2634.Google Scholar

92 Ibid. 28 Apr. 1936, 2637–40.

93 Ibid. 28 Apr. 1936, 2641–4.

94 Ibid. 1 May 1936, 2865.

95 Ibid. 1 May 1936, 2878.

96 Ibid. 1 May 1936, 2870.

97 Ibid.

98 Ibid. 1 May 1936, 2870–1.

99 Sunday Express, 31 05 1936Google Scholar, cited in Paton, , Hofmeyr, 239.Google Scholar

100 Du Toit, , ‘Political control’, 67.Google Scholar

101 Hansard, 22 01 1937, 523–4Google Scholar; Paton, , Hofmeyr, 259.Google Scholar

102 Hansard, 22 01 1937, 523–4.Google Scholar

103 Ibid. 22 Jan. 1937, 522–4.

104 Ibid. 22 Jan. 1937, 527.

105 Ibid. 22 Jan. 1937, 529.

106 Paton, , Hofmeyr, 259–61.Google Scholar

107 Ibid. 281.

108 The Star, 13 05 1938.Google Scholar

109 Ibid.

110 Ibid. 7 May 1938.

111 The Star, 5 05 1938Google Scholar; Furlong, , Crown and Swastika, 38.Google Scholar

112 Die Transvaler, 10 05 1938.Google Scholar

113 Ibid. 9 May 1938.

114 The Star, 5 05 1938.Google Scholar

115 Die Vaderland, 12 05 1938.Google Scholar

116 The Star, 3–16 05 1938Google Scholar; Die Vaderland, 9–11 05 1938.Google Scholar

117 The Star, 4 05 1938.Google Scholar

118 Ibid. 4 May 1938.

119 Die Vaderland, 9 05 1938.Google Scholar

120 Ibid. 9 May 1938.

121 The Star, 11 05 1938.Google Scholar

122 Ibid.

123 Ibid.

124 Ibid. 7 May 1938.

125 The Star, 9 05 and 11 05 1938.Google Scholar

126 Die Vaderland, 9 05 1938.Google Scholar

127 The Star, 9 05 1938.Google Scholar

128 Die Vaderland, 9 05 1938.Google Scholar

129 Ibid.

130 Indian Opinion, 17 04 1936Google Scholar

131 Swan, , Ideology, 200–1.Google Scholar

132 The Star, 2 12 1938, 23 12 1938.Google Scholar

133 Daily Express, 24 11 1938Google Scholar; Die Vaderland, 26 11 1938.Google Scholar

134 The Star, 23 11 1938, 5 12 1938Google Scholar; Daily Express, 24 11 1938.Google Scholar

135 The Star, 23 11 1938.Google Scholar

136 Die Vaderland, 26 11 1938.Google Scholar

137 The Star, 5 11 1938Google Scholar, Die Vaderland, 24 01 1939.Google Scholar

138 Die Transvaler, 1 12 1938.Google Scholar

139 Furlong, , Between Crown and Swastika, 100, 117.Google Scholar

140 Ibid. 91, 117.

141 Du Toit, , ‘Political control’, 77Google Scholar; Furlong, , Between Crown and Swastika, 99.Google Scholar

142 Du Toit, , ‘Political control’, 68–9.Google Scholar

143 De Villiers, , Commission, 32Google Scholar; Du Toit, , ‘Political control’, 71–2.Google Scholar

144 De Villiers, , Commission, 30.Google Scholar

145 Furlong, Patrick, The Mixed Marriages Act: An Historical and Theological Study (Cape Town, 1983), 31–8Google Scholar; Du Toit, , ‘Political control’, 73–4Google Scholar; Hansard, 19 05 1949, 6167–8.Google Scholar

146 Palmer, Bryan D., Descent Into Discourse: The Reification of Language and the Writing of Social History (Philadelphia, 1990), 5.Google Scholar

147 West, Cornel, The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism (Madison, 1989), 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

148 Nietzsche, Friedrich, ‘The Anti-Christ’, in Nietzsche, Friedrich (Hollingdale, R. J. ed. and trans.), Twilight of the Idols and the Anti-Christ (Harmondsworth, 1974), 166.Google Scholar