Last updated 09/07/24: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
The right to freedom of religion and belief is closely linked with the rights to free expression of opinion, to peaceable assembly and freedom of association. In particular, they share the common purpose of assuring to an individual freedom of choice. Moreover, to be effective, each normally requires the use of one or other of the means of dissemination of knowledge and information, which include newspapers, books, pamphlets, petitions, posters, radio, television and motion pictures. Likewise, to be effective, the rights to freedom of religion and free expression of opinion must be linked to freedom of association in the sense of the right to form and to join organisations for the advancement of particular views and interests. This is particularly true of cities and other densely populated areas. Indeed, the essential similarity between these rights was reflected in their embodiment in a single article in earlier Sudan constitutions. A consequence of these similarities is that the denial or infringement of any one of them has further ramifications on the other rights apparently left intact. Accordingly, the present study, while focusing on freedom of religion, will make brief excursions into the related rights of free expression of opinion, assembly and association. Before considering problems raised by freedom of religion, reference must first be made to its necessity.
1 Cox, A., The Warren Court: Constitutional Decision as an Instrument of Reform, 1968, 103–113Google Scholar; Smith, de, Constitutional and administrative law, 1973, 474.Google Scholar
2 Art. 7 of the Self-Government Statute, 1953, and art. 5, common to the Transitional Constitution, 1956, and the Transitional Constitution (amended 1964).
3 Holdsworth, , “The state and religious non-conformity: an historical retrospect”, (1920) 36 L.Q.R. 339;Google ScholarKrishnaswami, , The Study of Discrimination in the Matters of Religious Rights and Practices, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub. 2/200/Rev. 1, at 55;Google ScholarMcDougal, , Lasswell, and Chen, , Human Rights and World Public Order, 1980, 665–687.Google Scholar
4 Gardahi, Choucri, “Conflict of laws”, [in] Khadduri, and Liebesny, (eds.), Law in the Middle East, 1955, 342–345;Google ScholarMahmassani, , “International law in the light of Islamic doctrine”, 117 Receuil des cours 201, at 210ff.;Google ScholarAl-Ghazali, Mohamed, Hugug Al-Insan Biin Talim Al-Islam wa Alan Al-Omum Al-Muthda, 2nd ed., Cairo 1965, 57–59.Google Scholar
5 Krishnaswami, , op. cit., at 31–45;Google ScholarMcDougal, , Laswell, and Chen, , op. cit., at 662;Google ScholarClark, , “The United Nations and religious freedom”, 11 N.Y.U.J. Int'l L. & Pol. 197, at 200–218 (1978/1979);Google ScholarTribe, , American Constitutional Law, 1978, esp. 834–885.Google Scholar
6 Krishnaswami, v.
7 Art. 16(e).
8 S. 242A.
9 McDougal, , Lasswell, and Chen, , op. cit., 663–664;Google ScholarHenkin, , The Rights of Man Today, 1978Google Scholar, Mill, John Stuart, On Liberty, Boston, 1863, 107–143.Google Scholar
10 McDougal, , Lasswell, and Chen, , 664;Google ScholarHenkin, , op. cit., 41.Google Scholar
11 Holdsworth, , op. cit., 356;Google ScholarMcDougal, , Lasswell, and Chen, , 664.Google Scholar
12 Abram, , “Freedom of thought, conscience and religion”, (1967) 8 J.I.C.J. 40, at 44.Google Scholar
13 AC-AP-16–1947, unreported succession case in which the deceased, formerly a Muslim, died a Christian and the validity of polygamous marriage contracted during the Mahdist rule was raised. See also Mariam Abdulla Yusif Abagi v Administrator of the Estate of Abdulla Yusif Abagi, (1900–1931) l S.L.R. 297Google Scholar (where the facts are similar to the Habashi Rizgalla Habashi case).
14 Abram, , op. cit., 45.Google Scholar
15 Bickel, , The Morality of Consent, 1975, 53–54Google Scholar
16 Farran, , Matrimonial Laws of the Sudan, 1963;Google ScholarDhariir, El, Nizam Al-Ahwal Al-Shakhsiya, Ma'had Buhut Al-Dirasat Al-Arabiya, 1968;Google ScholarNicolas Stephanou Stergiou v Aristea Nicolas Stergiou (1953) S.L.J.R. 182.Google Scholar
17 S. 242.
18 S. 242A.
19 S. 243.
20 S. 244.
21 S. 245.
22 Cf. Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395Google Scholar U.S. 444 (1969 S.Ct), where the accused was convicted under a statute which made it a criminal offence for a person to advocate or teach the duty, necessity, or propriety of violence as a means of accomplishing industrial or political reform; or to publish or circulate or display any book or paper containing such advocacy; or to justify the commission of violent acts with intent to exemplify, spread or advocate the propriety of the doctrines of criminal syndicalism; or voluntarily to assemble with a group formed to teach or advocate the doctrines of criminal syndicalism. The Supreme Court invalidated the statute as violating the right to free expression of opinion since it permitted the government to punish mere advocacy of violence. In its view the statute should have been limited to advocacy directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and likely to produce such action.
23 Derrett, , Religion, Law and State in India, 1968, 449.Google Scholar
24 (1960) S.L.J.R. 245.Google Scholar
25 At p. 250.
26 At p. 253. The word “hosh” means a fence.
27 At p. 250.
28 (1962) S.L.J.R. 83.Google Scholar
29 At p. 84.
30 (1963) S.L.J.R. 56.Google Scholar
31 S. 3(1) and Part I of the First Schedule prohibited, inter alia, “(4). Any book or document whether written, printed or otherwise produced or any drawing, painting or engraving, or any reproduction of the same by any means or any photograph or film or other article which is indecent, obscene or likely to throw contempt on the Muslim or Christian religions or tending to subvert the Government or constitution of the Sudan or which tends to incite any person in the Sudan to commit any crime in disturbance of the peace or to raise discontent or disaffection among the inhabitants of the Sudan or to promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between different classes of such inhabitants or any means of reproduction of the articles aforesaid.”
32 Legislative Supplement to the Sudan Gazette, No. 970 o f 15 05, 1962.Google Scholar
33 Legislative Supplement to the Sudan Gazette, No. 1159 of 15 03, 1974.Google Scholar The Amendment Act substitutes the words “Secretary General of the Religious Affairs and Wakfs” for the words “Minister of Interior” in the 1962 Act.
34 Ss. 5 and 6(1)(a).
35 S. 6(1)(b).
36 S. 6(2).
37 Letter from the interior minister, Major-General Ahmed Magzoub el Bahari, to the General Secretary of the Cabinet, cited in Sudanow, 02, 1980, p. 11.Google Scholar
38 Sudanow, ibid., at 11–12.
39 The recommendations are printed in Beshir, Mohamed Omer, The Southern Sudan: Background to Conflict, 1968, 183–185.Google Scholar
40 Sudanow, above, n. 37, 12.
41 (1966) S.L.J.R. 99.Google Scholar
42 At p. 100.
43 At p. 107.
44 At p. 108.
45 The Transitional Constitution (amended 1964) Amendments Nos. 2 and 3 of 1965, amending articles 5(2) and 46 respectively.
46 Legislative Supplement to the Sudan Gazette, No. 1015 of 9 12, 1965.Google Scholar Communism is still unlawful under the Unlawful Associations Act, 1924: see Laws of the Sudan, Vol. I (6th ed., Revised up to 31 12, 1974), Chap. 24.Google Scholar
47 (1968) S. I. J. R. l; noted by Marasinghe, in (1971) 20 I. C. L. Q. 645, at 654–657.Google Scholar
48 (1968) S.L.J.R. 114, at 117.Google Scholar
49 Republican Order No. 1 of 1969, Legislative Supplement to the Sudan Gazette, No. 1076 of 25 05, 1969.Google Scholar
50 See literature cited, n. 1.
51 See Sudan Pamphlets, Vol. 11 (University of Khartoum Library).Google Scholar
52 Grand Kadi Hassan Muddathir, A Memorandum for the Enactment of a Sudan Constitution Devised from the Principles of Islam, 1956, 1.Google Scholar
53 For the view that far from reflecting the traditions of the people law can be used to create a social and cultural revolution, see Lipstein, , “The reception of western law in Turkey”, (1956) 6 Annales de la Faculté 11, at 225;Google ScholarHamson, , “The Istanbul Conference of 1955”, (1956) 5 I.C.L.Q. 26;Google ScholarTwining, , “Some aspects of reception”, (1957) S.L.J.R. 229;Google ScholarWatson, , “Comparative law and legal change”, (1978) 37 C.L.J. 313.Google Scholar
54 Hassan Muddathir, above, n. 52, 19.
55 Alier, Abel, “The Southern Sudan question”, [in] Wai, Dunstan (ed.). The Southern Sudan: The Problem of National Integration, 1973, 23, at 25.Google Scholar
56 Abdel-Rahim, Muddathir, Changing Patterns of Civilian-Military Relations in the Sudan, Uppsala, 1978, 22.Google Scholar
57 Krishnaswami, , above, n. 3, 46;Google ScholarMcDougal, , Lasswell and Chen, above, n. 3. 816–819.Google ScholarLasswell, and Chen, , above, n. 3, 816–819.Google Scholar
58 (1967) Yearbook of the United Nations, pp. 491–492.Google ScholarPubMed
59 Art. l (d).
60 UNGA/Distr. General/A/36/684 dated 19 11, 1981.Google Scholar
61 Tribe, , above, n. 5, 816–819.Google Scholar
62 Tribe, , 866–867.Google Scholar
63 On the differences in these values in personal laws, see, e.g., the literature cited above, n. 16.
64 Naiem, Abdullahi Ahmed el, Sudanow, 09, 1977;Google ScholarTier, Akolda M., Sudanow, 01, 1978.Google Scholar
65 S. 6(iv).
66 S. 3.
67 S. 4(b).
68 Sudanow, above, n. 37, 13–14.Google Scholar
69 Meili, , International Civil and Commercial Law, (Khun's, Trans. 1905) 52–58;Google ScholarGoadby, , “Administration of justice in Egypt”, (1907) 23 L.Q.R. 409, 416–417;Google ScholarBuckland, and McNair, , Roman Law and Common Law, 1965, 23–25;Google ScholarJolowicz, and Nicholas, , Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law, 3d ed., 1972, 71–74 and 102–107;Google ScholarLipstein, , “The general principles of private international law”, (1972–1) 135 Receuil des cours 106.Google Scholar
70 Calisse, , A History of Italian Law, 1928, 18, at 25;Google ScholarBeale, , (1935);Google Scholar 3 Conflict of Laws 1888; Meynial, , “Roman Law”, [in] Crump, and Jacob, (eds.), The legacy of the Middle Ages, 1926, 363, at 378;Google ScholarLipstein, , op. cit., 109, 112 and 126–127.Google Scholar
71 Goadby, , op. cit., 411;Google ScholarBrinton, , The Mixed Courts of Egypt, 3, 157–167Google Scholar and Appendices F and N, where the charters of Egyptian mixed courts are reprinted (rev. ed. 1968); Anderson, , “Law reform in Egypt: 1850–1950”, [in] Holt, (ed.), Political and Social Change in Modern Egypt 1968, 209, at 211;Google ScholarLiebesny, , “The development of western judicial privileges”, [in] Khadduri, and Liebesny, (eds.), op. cit., n. 4, 309;Google ScholarSalama, , Al-Wasit fi Al-Ahwal Al-Shakhsiya Lilwataniin Gair Al-Muslimiin, Dar Al-Fikr Al-Arabi, 1968, 50.Google Scholar
72 International Commission of Jurists, The Rule of Law and Human Rights: Principles and Definitions, 1966, 26;Google Scholar “It is always important that the definition and interpretation of the law should be as certain as possible, and this is of particular importance in the case of criminal law, where the citizen's life or liberty may be at stake.”
73 Abu Rannat, C. J., “The relationship between Islamic and customary law in the Sudan”, (1960) 4 J.A.L. 9, at 10;Google ScholarEl Nur, J., “The role of the Native Courts in the administration of justice in the Sudan”, (1960) 41 Sudan Notes and Records 78;Google ScholarThompson, , “The formative era in the law of the Sudan”, (1965) S.L.J.R. 474, at 477;Google ScholarAli Lufti, J., “The future of English law in the Sudan”, (1967) S.L.J.R. 219, at 234;Google ScholarDeng, “The future of customary law in the Sudan”, (1969) 2 Malaya L.R. 268, at 282.Google Scholar
74 Abu Rannat, C.J., ibid., at 6.
75 International Herald Tribune, 18 02, 1982, p. 5.Google Scholar
