Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T09:20:07.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agricultural Economics Research and Extension Needs of Small-Scale, Limited-Resource Farmers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Jerry G. West
Jerry G. West*
Affiliation:
Cooperative Research, SEA/USDA, on temporary duty from the Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Missouri-Columbiaunder provisions of the Intergovernmental Personnel Act
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A traditional approach to defining problems or needs is to compare a situation (what is) with objectives or valuations (what ought to be). A more elaborate version of this approach introduces some dynamics into the scheme by projecting current trends to determine how the expected situation some time in the future compares with what we would like the situation to be. One difficulty in such an approach is deciding what dimensions of the situation are important.

In considering the problems of small farms, do we primarily examine income and the measures of wellbeing — or emphasize the structure of agriculture and its implications for our society? Must we consider the extent to which concern for conservation of soil and energy resources is related to size of farms? Should we complicate the picture even more, as is often argued, by including the non-market-goods dimensions [18]? Some researchers would merely use a change in the number of small farms as indicative of a problem, but this is only symptomatic of more basic factors at work.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , July 1979 , pp. 49 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Bailey, Warren R. The One Man Farm, ERS-519, Economic Research Service, USDA, 1973.Google Scholar
[2] Barkley, Paul W. “Some Nonfarm Effects of Changes in Agricultural Technology,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 60, May 1978, pp. 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Goldschmidt, Walter R. “Small Business and the Community: A Study in Central Valley of California on Effects of Scale of Farm Operations,” U.S. Senate, Report of the Special Committee to Study Problems of Small Business, 79th Congress, 2nd Session, December 1946.Google Scholar
[4] Hall, Bruce F. and LeVeen, E. Phillip. “Farm Size and Economic Efficiency: The Case of California,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 60, November 1978, pp. 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Hottel, J. Bruce and Reinsel, Robert D.. Returns to Equity Capital by Economic Class of Farm, Agricultural Economics Report No. 347, Economic Research Service, USDA, August 1976.Google Scholar
[6] Ladewig, Howard W. and Edmondson, Vance W.. The Effectiveness of Nonprofessionals in Cooperative Extension Education for Low-Income Farmers, B-1122, Texas A&M University Experiment Station, May 1972.Google Scholar
[7] LeVan, Donald E. Part-time Farming in Central Missouri, unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Missouri, Columbia, 1972.Google Scholar
[8] Lewis, James A. “Small Farm Definitions and Their Effect on the Target Population,” paper presented to Ad Hoc Task Force on Small Farm Research Needs, conference sponsored by North Central Regional Center for Rural Development, Ames, Iowa, March 1978.Google Scholar
[9] Madden, J. Patrick. Economies of Size in Farming, Agricultural Economics Report 107, Economic Research Service, USDA, 1967.Google Scholar
[10] Marshall, Ray and Thompson, Allen. Status and Prospects of Small Farmers in the South. Atlanta, Georgia: Southern Regional Council, Inc., 1976.Google Scholar
[11] Myer, Gordon. The Missouri Small Farm Program—An Analytical Evaluation, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri—Columbia, April 1976.Google Scholar
[12] Orden, David and Edwards, Patricia K.. “Small Farm Programs in the Southern United States,” paper presented at the Southern Small Farm Management Workshop, Nashville, Tennessee, October 25-27, 1978.Google Scholar
[13] Orden, David and Smith, Dennis K.. Small Farm Programs: Implications from a Study in Virginia, Research Division Bulletin 135, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, October 1978.Google Scholar
[14] Peterson, Willis and ami, Yuj iro Hay. “Technical Change in Agriculture,” in A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature, Vol. 1, Traditional Fields of Agricultural Economics, 1940's to 1970's, Martin, L. R., ed., University of Minnesota Press, 1977.Google Scholar
[15] Raup, Philip M. “Some Questions of Value and Scale in American Agriculture,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 60, May 1978, pp. 303–308.Google Scholar
[16] Schmitz, Andrew and Seckler, David. “Mechanized Agriculture and Social Welfare: The Case of the Tomato Harvester,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 52, November 1970, pp. 569–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Schumacher, J. F. Small is Beautiful, Economics as if People Mattered. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1973.Google Scholar
[18] Stevens, Joe B. “The Demand for Non-Market Goods and Services as Revealed Through Migration to Southern Oregon,” paper presented to Annual Meeting of W-118R, Regional Research Committee, Salt Lake City, October 1978.Google Scholar
[19] Stewart, Frances. Technology and Underdevelopment. Westview Press, Inc., 1977.Google Scholar
[20] Weinberg, Alvin M. “Science for the People or by the People?” Nature, Volume 274, August 1978.Google Scholar
[21] West, Jerry G., et al. Missouri Small Farm Program, An Evaluation With a Control Group, SR-176, Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station, October 1975.Google Scholar
[22] West, Jerry G. “Small Farms in Missouri: Their Characteristics and Their Problems,” Towards a Federal Small Farms Policy, Washington D.C.: National Rural Center Report Number 9, November, 1978.Google Scholar